Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Warm-Up
Can you explain speech acts from Gees perspective (using his terms)?
i.e.,
Can you explain speech acts from Martin and Roses perspective (using their terms)?
Levinson helps us think in detail on a technical level about how particular words are functioning
According to the performative hypothesis, frankly should be functioning the same way in all of these utterances, but its not. In 50 and 52 it modifies the way the message is told, in 51 its a warning that something negative is coming. What does this tell us about using words as evidence in Pragmatic oriented interpretation?
* What does that tell you about how to model speech acts computationally?
For next time we will pass out examples from AMI and coding manual By Wed I will link in the readings for Unit 2 Next Monday I will hand out the annotated corpus and documentation for SIDE plugins
Student Comment
I'm not sure we can analyze a text using our current knowledge of speech acts. We can only determine if there are any speech acts and where specifically they occur. Speech act theory as we've discussed it so far doesn't include any analytical feature beyond sentence deconstruction, unlike Gee's and SFL methodologies.
Gee: Anthropology
Speech
acts are kinds of discourse practices, there are conventional ways of doing things with words as indicated through form-function correspondences Figured worlds set up conditionally relevant speech acts (adjacency pairs)
Student Questions
I think that the main difference between speech act analysis and the other types of analyses that we have covered thus far is that it explicitly asks the analyst to consider a certain texts many voicesits heteroglossia why would someone want to talk if they are not trying to achieve something (consciously, or unconsciously)?
Please clarify
Throughout the conversation, Jim uses illocutionary force to direct the flow of conversation. From "go ahead" (2) to the series of probing questions (12, 15, 23, 33, 39, 57, 64, 82), his statements range from clearly pushing the conversation ahead to something that is closer to bordering on factual yes/no questions. Even as he gets more into informational questions, near the end of the dialogue, these are still compelling Bonnie to continue her explanations.
Recognize what actions users are doing in a natural language based interface Sometimes mixed with domain level frames to detect what someone wanted in a task based dialogue system (scheduling a meeting, registering for a conference, making an airplane reservation) If clusters of speech acts are associated with roles, you can use them to identify roles within an interaction
Some work on social positioning in the mixedinitiative dialogue community in the 90s
Each move is part of a strategy Moves work together to accomplish intentions But each speaker has their own set of intentions in some sense they are competing You can explain what strategies were effective or not for accomplishing any of these intentions From this analysis, you can conclude things about power, positioning, influence, etc. Why might someone be insulted when you politely explain something to them?
You can talk about different social languages used to enact speech acts (e.g., direct versus indirect)
* In some ways our goals are different from all of these. But all of them have insights into how language works. Anthropologists know how it functions in societies. Rhetoriticians know how it functions in interpersonal relationships. And logicians have thought about how humans are able to interpret language from the available evidence.
What is Pragmatics?
Pragmatics is what is beyond truth conditional meaning Part of the chapter focuses on whether there is anything beyond truth conditional meaning If you accept that there is something beyond that, one thing there is is what language does, apart from what it means Formal pragmatics is about building models that allow us to compute what language does
Using
Note that HMMs and CRFs are statistical techniques that pick up on sequencing Conditional probability P(X|Y): If you know Y is true already, what is the probability that X is true? If probabilities are independent, you can combine them by multiplying
Features:
as well
Unit 3: Product Reviews (Sentiment) Unit 4: Blog corpus (Age and Gender) Unit 5: AMI meeting corpus (Dialogue Acts) Other corpora
As a shortcut, you can find a script online Excerpt should be no more than one page of text
Select one of the methodologies we are discussing in Unit 1 (e.g., from Gee, Martin & Rose, or Levinson) Do a qualitative analysis of the data and write it up
Use readings from Unit 1 as a collection of models to chose from Turn in data, raw analysis (can be annotations added to the data), and write up (your interpretation of the analysis) Not required now!! Prepare a powerpoint presentation for class (no more than 5 minutes of
material)
Other Ideas: Twitter data, Google Groups, transcribe a real conversation (if your conversational partners agree)
Questions?