Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Реферат
по дисциплине: «Лексикология»
иностранных языков
Оценка «__________»
Караганда 2000
This great topic considered the structure of English words includes many items. There are such as
And I hope the material I gathered with help of Arnold's book and other internet material will be
There are many words in English that are fairly obviously analyzable into smaller grammatical
units. For example, the word "unacceptability" can be divided into un-, accept, abil-, and -ity (abil-
being a variant of -able). Of these, at least three are minimal grammatical units, in the sense that
they cannot be analyzed into yet smaller grammatical units--un-, abil-, and ity. The status of accept,
from this point of view, is somewhat uncertain. Given the existence of such forms as accede and
accuse, on the one hand, and of except, exceed, and excuse, on the other, one might be inclined to
analyze accept into ac- (which might subsequently be recognized as a variant of ad-) and -cept. The
question is left open. Minimal grammatical units like un-, abil-, and -ity are what Bloomfield called
within sets of words. For example, "unacceptable," "untrue," and "ungracious" are phonetically (or,
phonologically) similar as far as the first syllable is concerned and are similar in meaning in that
each of them is negative by contrast with a corresponding positive adjective ("acceptable," "true,"
"gracious"). This "partial phonetic-semantic resemblance" is accounted for by noting that the words
in question contain the same morpheme (namely, un-) and that this morpheme has a certain
Morphs that are in complementary distribution and represent the same morpheme are said to
be allomorphs of that morpheme. For example, the regular plurals of English nouns are formed
by adding one of three morphs on to the form of the singular: /s/, /z/, or /iz/ (in the
2
corresponding written forms both /s/ and /z/ are written -s and /iz/ is written -es). Their
if the morph to which they are to be added ends in a "sibilant" sound (e.g., s, z, sh, ch), then
the syllabic allomorph /iz/ is selected (e.g., fish-es /fis-iz/, match-es /mac-iz/);
Otherwise the nonsyllabic allomorphs are selected, the voiceless allomorph /s/ with morphs
ending in a voiceless consonant (e.g., cat-s /kat-s/) and the voiced allomorph /z/ with morphs
ending in a vowel or voiced consonant (e.g., flea-s /fli-z/, dog-s /dog-z/). These three
allomorphs, it will be evident, are in complementary distribution, and the alternation between
them is determined by the phonological structure of the preceding morph. Thus the choice is
phonologically conditioned.
3
Morpheme
In linguistics, the smallest grammatical unit of speech; it may be a word, like "place" or "an," or an
element of a word, like re- and -ed in "reappeared." So-called isolating languages, such as
Vietnamese, have a one-to-one correspondence of morphemes to words; i.e., no words contain more
than one morpheme. Variants of a morpheme are called allomorphs; the ending -s, indicating
plural in "cats," "dogs," the -es in "dishes," and the -en of "oxen" are all allomorphs of the plural
morpheme. The word "talked" is represented by two morphemes, "talk" and the past-tense
morpheme, here indicated by -ed. The study of words and morphemes is included in morphology.
4
Affixation
Affixes, word elements attached to words, may either precede, as prefixes (do, undo; way, subway),
or follow, as suffixes (do, doer; way, wayward). They may be native (overdo, waywardness), Greek
(hyperbole, thesis), or Latin (supersede, pediment). Modern technologists greatly favour the neo-
Hellenic prefixes macro-"long, large," micro- "small," para- "alongside," poly- "many," and the
Latin mini-, with its antonym maxi-. Greek and Latin affixes have become so fully acclimatized that
they can occur together in one and the same word, as, indeed, in "ac-climat-ize-d," just used,
consisting of a Latin prefix plus a Greek stem plus a Greek suffix plus an English inflection.
Suffixes are bound more closely than prefixes to the stems or root elements of words. Consider, for
instance, the wide variety of agent suffixes in the nouns actor, artisan, dotard, engineer, financier,
hireling, magistrate, merchant, scientist, secretary, songster, student, and worker. Suffixes may
come to be attached to stems quite fortuitously, but, once attached, they are likely to be permanent.
At the same time, one suffix can perform many functions. The suffix -er denotes the doer of the
action in the words worker, driver, and hunter; the instrument in chopper, harvester, and roller; and
the dweller in Icelander, Londoner. It refers to things or actions associated with the basic concept in
the words breather, "pause to take breath"; diner, "dining car on a train"; and fiver, "five-pound
note." In the terms disclaimer, misnomer, and rejoinder (all from French) the suffix denotes one
single instance of the action expressed by the verb. Usage may prove capricious. Whereas a writer
is a person, a typewriter is a machine. For some time a computer was both, but now, with the
invention and extensive use of electronic apparatus, the word is no longer used of persons.
5
Allomorphs
The combining from allo-from Greek allos ‘other’ is used to denote elements of a group whose
members together constitute a structural unit of the language (allophones, allomorphs). Thus, -ion/-
tion/-sion/-ation/ are the positional variants of the same suffix. to show this they are taken together
and separated by slight deference in sound form depending on the final phoneme of preceding stem.
when two linguistic variants cannot appear in the same environment. Thus, stems ending in
consonants take as a rule –ation (liberation); stems ending in pt, however, take -tion (corruption)
Allomorph will also occur among prefixes. Their form then depends on the initials of the stem with
which they will assimilate. A prefix such as im- occurs before bilabials (impossible), its allomorph
ir- before r (irregular), il- before l (illegal). It is in- before all other consonants and vowels (indirect,
inability)
In American linguistic allomorphs are treated on a purely semantic basis, so that not only [iz] in
dishes, [z] in dreams and [s] in books, which are allomorphs in the sense given above, but also
formally unrelated [эn] in oxen, the vowel modification in tooth:: teeth and zero suffix in many
sheep are considered to be allomorphs of the same morpheme on the strength of the sameness of
6
Suffixes
Classification of suffixes
There are different classifications of suffixes in a linguistic research. Affixes have been classified
according to their origin, parts of speech they served form, frequency, productivity and other
characteristics.
Within the parts of speech suffixes have been classified according to lexico-grammatical groups,
Noun-forming suffixes:
(writer); -ess (actress); -hood (manhood); -ness (tenderness); -ship (friendship) etc.
Adjective-forming suffixes:
-able/-ible/-uble (unbearable, audible, soluble); -al (formal); -ish(Irish, reddish); -ive (active); -less
Numeral-forming suffixes:
Verb-forming suffixes:
-ate (facilitate); -er (glimmer); -en (shorten); -ish (establish); -ize (equalize).
Adverb-forming suffixes:
A lexico-grammatical class may be defined as a class of lexical elements possessing the same
lexico-grammatical meaning and a common system of forms in which the grammatical categories
inherent in these units. Taking up nouns we can subdivide them into proper and common nouns.
And Among common nouns we will distinguish personal names, names of other animate beings,
Personal nouns that are emotionally neutral occur with the following suffixes:
7
-an,(grammarian),-ant/-ent (servant), -arian (vegetarian); -ee (examinee); -er (porter); -ician
But this classification should be accepted with caution. There may be other variants, however,
whose different meaning will be signaled by a difference in distribution, and these will belong to
8
Prefixes
Derivational morphemes affixed before the stem are called prefixes. They modify the lexical
meaning of stem, but in so doing they seldom effects its basic lexico-grammatical component.
Therefore both the simple word and its prefixed derivative mostly belong to the same part of
speech. The prefix mis-, for instance, when added to verb, conveys the meaning ‘wrongly’, ‘badly’,
‘unfavorably’; it does not suggest any other part of speech but the verb. Compare the following
are strictly proportional semantically. There are may be other cases where the semantic relationship
is slightly different, but the general the general lexico-grammatical7 meaning remains. giving::
misgiving ‘foreboding’
The semantic effect of a prefix may be termed adverbial because it modifies the idea suggested by
The examples below will prove it. It has been already shown that the prefix mis- is equivalent to the
adverbs wrongly and badly, therefore by expressing evaluation it modifies the corresponding verbs
for manner. The prefixes pre- and post- refer to time (historic:: prehistoric, pay:: prepay, view::
preview). The last word means to view a film or a play before it is submitted to the general public.
Compare also: Graduate :: post graduate (about the course of study carried on after graduation). The
prefix out- means ‘in manner that surpasses’ : outlive (to live longer, outnumber (to exceed in
number).
The general idea of negation is expressed by dis-; it may mean ‘not’, ‘away’, ‘apart’. agree::
disagree (not to agree), appear:: disappear (reverse of appear). Non- is often used in abstract verbal
nouns such as noninterference, nonsense, or nonresistance, and participles or former participles like
noncommissioned (about an officer in the army below the rank of a commissioned officer).
9
Instead of conclusion
So, I tried to touch some items of great topic Morphological structure of English word. Certainly
the number of material in my work is not enough to learn this item deeply in detail. But, my aim
was just to run trough this topic paying attention on general in my mind points and examples. And I
hope my work helped understand some items of this Great topic not only myself, but the readers
and people whom I tell this ‘referat’. I think the beginners and maybe intermediate student may find
something interesting here, that relieves them from reading very hard Arnold’s book and may be
20.05.00
10