Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Jose Eustate, A047 128 564 (BIA Dec. 20, 2013)

Jose Eustate, A047 128 564 (BIA Dec. 20, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 300|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for further consideration of the respondent’s motion to reopen an in absentia removal order in light of evidence submitted on appeal indicating that his underlying criminal conviction had been vacated. The decision was written by Member Edward Grant.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for further consideration of the respondent’s motion to reopen an in absentia removal order in light of evidence submitted on appeal indicating that his underlying criminal conviction had been vacated. The decision was written by Member Edward Grant.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Jan 07, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/30/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Stepe A. agana, sq. aw Oces o Steen A. agaa 145 ssex St. arece,   Name:USTAT,JOS
   ic
Executive Oce r Immgraon Revew
B  mm  O  h 
5 I 07
Leesburg Pik, Suit
2000
Fals Chuc Vgin
20530
HS/IC Oice o Chie Counsel -BOS P

Box 72 Bosto, A 214 A 4712564 Date o tis notice: 2/2/ 213
Enclosed s a copy of he Boad's ecison and orde n the above-eenced case. Encosre
Pe Meme: Ga dwad 
Sncerely,
c
Donna Car Chef Cerk
 eem 
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Jose Eustate, A047 128 564 (BIA Dec. 20, 2013)
 
EUSTAE, JOSE A047-128564 LASALE PARISH DEENTION CTR 830 PNEH ROAD JENA, LA 132 Name:EUSAEJOSE
   ic
xecive Oce r igraion Reve
B  mm  O  h 
5107
eesurg Pe Su
200
Fals Churc Vrgina
20530
HS/CE Oice of Chie Counsel BO P

Box 8728 Boston, MA 02114 A 128564 Dte o ths notice: 22 21
ncosed is a cp o e oas decson n e aberereced case Ts cp s eing provded o o as a coues Yo aoe o repesenaive as been seed i i decson psan o
8
CFR. § 1292(a)  e aace decsin es a ou be reved o e Unied aes o ams an igaon Jdges decisn derng a o be reoved, an peion  eve o e aaced decsin s be ed i and receved b e apppiae ct  appeas iin
0
as f e ae o e ecsion. ncsue
e Meme: Ga dwad 
ncee
c
na Ca Cie Ce
  k
Cite as: Jose Eustate, A047 128 564 (BIA Dec. 20, 2013)
 
� 
of
J
Executive Ofce

Imgraton Revew Deso o the Boad of ato Appeals Fas Chuh, Vga
5
Fie: A04 7 128 56 -Boston MA In re JOSE EUSTATE IN RMOVL PROCEEDNGS APPEA ND MOION Date ON BEHA  SPODEN Stephen A agana Esquire APPLICAION eoeng; remand
C  0

The responent has appeaed om the Imiation Judge's decision ated Juy 16 03.  he Imigration Juge dee the resondent's motion to reopen proceeings in whic he was ordered removed in absentia. n ctober 28, 203, the resondent ed a motion o remad The responent's motion to reman il be ante The oar revies an Immigration Judge's nings of ct incluing ndings as to he credibiliy of testimony under the "clearly erroneous standard 8 C..R § 1003(d)(3)(i) The Bod reiews estions of aw discretion,  judgment ad all oter issues in apeals om decisions ofmiation Judges e novo 8 C § 1003(d)3)(ii) In suppor of is motion to reman he resonent ha presented eience that his 205 conviction r he oense of awl Distribution of a Controle Substance in violation of  Mas Gen aws ch 94C § 32A(a) was vacated and a "guityed jugment as entered ner hese circusances e nd i approriae o read the record o he migaion Jdge r consideration of e respondent's evience relating to the vacation of his coniction an the lega eec of that action
S   Pckg
23 I&N Dec 61 (IA 2003
;
  RdgzRz
22 I&N Dec 1378 (BIA 200) nding siict the istinction eween convictions acated on the basis of a proceura or substantive ect in the underlying proceeings and conictions acaed because of ostconiction events such as rehabiiation or iiation arships) Accordingy the lowing orer wil be entere. ORDE he motion o reand is
 te and roceedings are remae to he Imigration Judge r er roceeings consistent
 the regoing ecision
Cite as: Jose Eustate, A047 128 564 (BIA Dec. 20, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->