.. eparent of Jusce
A0 009 37
re ISM DAY
MOV PROCEEDGS PPEL ON BEHL O ESPOET Pro se PPLICATION: Reenng
DEC 2 6
e resndent has appea e Iiation Judge's Seteber
decisin tht denied he respoent's otion o rpen proceedings in which e as ordere reoved i abentia. Te recrd i be reanded The Iation Judges r order ains
and-write noaion iicating th "his cou cncurs th the psitin f DHS We nd that the Iiaon Judge's decisin is insufcient r o revie
i does o adeqaely ddress he reen cts and cey se te man Judge's ega cncusins.
See Mater of
468, 477 (I 1999
(sing that e iatio udge is "responsible r he sbstanie coleeness of the ecision)
aicu, the min Judge ade insucient ndings of ct d lysis regaing wer the suo oice requireens were nder ur decisio in
18 ( 001
Mrver, the responent subed docuentaion in suppo of s oio wic te Iiation udge did not enio in his dision.
See Mater of
462 ( 002)
(nding that becse e Bds ct nding bility on ppel is iie, it is iporant r iion Jdges t incude in eir disions ce and cple ndigs of fact tt e uppred by the recr d e in cplince wi conoling law) We erere d hat e Iigrion ges decision is insucient r our re. e note at e respondent bied dcuenatin on appeal e Bd does nt consid eidence proered n apeal
Se ater of Fedorenk, 9
57 (I 1984.
ts a is eing reanded e leae t e Iiatin Jude o nsider s eidence,
ppopie Accordingly, he loin rder sal e enered ODR e recor is reae o te iaon uge r rer cion r pceeings consistent wi e reging opinion, and r he eny f new decision
Cite as: Ismael Daggy Ibrhaim, A205 009 375 (BIA Dec. 26, 2013)