Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Ismael Daggy Ibrahim, A205 009 375 (BIA Dec. 26, 2013)

Ismael Daggy Ibrahim, A205 009 375 (BIA Dec. 26, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 304 |Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for further consideration of the respondent’s motion to reopen proceedings in which he was ordered removed in absentia. The Board found that the immigration judge’s hand-written order, which stated that the “court concurs with the position of DHS,” did not provide a meaningful basis for appellate review. The decision was written by Member Sharon Hoffman.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for further consideration of the respondent’s motion to reopen proceedings in which he was ordered removed in absentia. The Board found that the immigration judge’s hand-written order, which stated that the “court concurs with the position of DHS,” did not provide a meaningful basis for appellate review. The decision was written by Member Sharon Hoffman.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center on Jan 07, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/31/2014

pdf

text

original

 
IBRAHM, SMAEL DAGGY A205-009375 15 PKE COUNT BLVD ORDS VALLY PA 18428 Name: IBRAHM IS DAGGY
U..  f Ji
Executive Oce r Immigation Reew
Board oflmmigration Appeas Qc e o the erk
5/07 Leebrg Pike, Ste 000 Fll Chh Vrgn 20530
HS/ICE Oice of Chef Counsel
HI 900 arket Steet Ste 346 hadelpha PA 1910 A 205-009-35 Date of ths notce 12/6/013
ncosed is  cpy of he Brd's decision nd rder in he boe-rerenced cse. ncosre
 b: Hm h
Sincerel,
D
O
c
Dn Cr he erk
g  k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Ismael Daggy Ibrhaim, A205 009 375 (BIA Dec. 26, 2013)
 
.. eparent of Jusce
·xuv   r
ig
w
l  i

File:
A0 009 37
-
 Philadelphia, PA
re ISM DAY

  MOV PROCEEDGS PPEL ON BEHL O ESPOET  Pro se  PPLICATION: Reenng
i
  
 m 
 Date
DEC 2 6
2013
e resndent has appea e Iiation Judge's Seteber
16
,
013
decisin tht denied he respoent's otion o rpen proceedings in which e as ordere reoved i abentia. Te recrd i be reanded The Iation Judges r order ains
a
and-write noaion iicating th "[]his cou cncurs th the psitin f DHS   We nd that the Iiaon Judge's decisin is insufcient r o revie
i does o adeqaely ddress he reen cts and cey se  te man Judge's ega cncusins.
See Mater of

22
I&N Dec.
468, 477 (I 1999
(sing that e iatio udge is "responsible r he sbstanie coleeness of the ecision)
aicu, the min Judge ade insucient ndings of ct d lysis regaing wer the suo oice requireens were  nder ur decisio in
Mater of

3
I&N Dec.
18 ( 001
 Mrver, the responent subed docuentaion in suppo of s oio wic te Iiation udge did not enio in his dision.
See Mater of
-
3
I& Dec
462 ( 002)
(nding that becse e Bds ct nding bility on ppel is iie, it is iporant r iion Jdges t incude in eir disions ce and cple ndigs of fact tt e uppred by the recr d e in cplince wi conoling law) We erere d hat e Iigrion ges decision is insucient r our re. e note at e respondent bied dcuenatin on appeal e Bd does nt consid eidence proered n apeal
Se ater of Fedorenk, 9
I& Dec
57 (I 1984.
 ts a is eing reanded e leae t e Iiatin Jude o nsider s eidence,
ppopie  Accordingly, he loin rder sal e enered ODR e recor is reae o te  iaon uge r rer cion r pceeings consistent wi e reging opinion, and r he eny f  new decision
Cite as: Ismael Daggy Ibrhaim, A205 009 375 (BIA Dec. 26, 2013)
 
NITED STATES DEPARTMEN OF JUSTICE EXECUTVE OFFCE FOR IMMIGTON REVEW MMGTON COURT

MRKET STREET, SUITE

PHELPHA PA
11
HOG
&
DENBERG LLC HOG RCK
EAST 8TH TREETUITE
2
WIMINGTON, DE
8
IN THE MATTER OF IM SML DAGGY FILE A
2
r
ALE
TO FORWD -NO DRESS PROVIDED DATE: Sep
, 21
¥
 TT CHED
S A COP OF TE DECISON OF THE IMMIGRATON JDGE. THIS DECISION S FNAL LESS  APEAL S FLED WTH THE OARD OF IMMIGRATON APPEAS WIHIN

CALEN DA OF THE DATE OF THE MAILING OF THIS WRITTEN DECSION SEE THE ENCLOSED FORMS
A
NSTRUCTONS FOR PROPERL PREPRING OR APPEA O NOTICE OF APEAL ATTACHED DOCUMENTS
FEE OR FEE WAVER REQUEST MUST E LED TO ORD OF MMGRTON APPEALS OFFCE OF THE CLERK PO OX
8
FALLS CHRCH A
22
 ATTACHED  A COP OF THE DECSON OF THE IMMIGRATON JUDGE AS THE RESUT OF OUR FALURE TO APE AT YOUR SCHEDULED DEPORTATION OR REMOVA HENG THIS DECSION IS FNAL LESS A MOTON TO REOPEN IS FLED N ACCORDE WTH SECTION
22c 
OF THE IGRATON
A
NATONALIT ACT, 8 U.SC SECTON
122Bc 
IN DEPORTATION PROCEEDINGS OR SECTON
2c} 6)
I
8
u.sc
SECTON
22ac (6
IN REMOV PROCEEDINGS F YOU FILE A MOTION TO REOEN OR MOTON MUST BE FLED WTH TS COT IMMGRATON COURT

MKET STREET SUTE

PHILELPHIA, PA
1
OTHER CC DH OFFCE OF THE CHIEF CONSEL

MRT TREET UTE
46
HELHA PA
1
COURT CLERK IMMIGRATION COURT FF

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->