Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Mickael Christian Martin, A076 549 309 (BIA Dec. 27, 2013)

Mickael Christian Martin, A076 549 309 (BIA Dec. 27, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 669|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld a finding that the respondent did not retract a false claim to U.S. citizenship “voluntarily and without delay” in light of evidence indicating the retraction only occurred after he was confronted with evidence that he was a citizen of France. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upheld a finding that the respondent did not retract a false claim to U.S. citizenship “voluntarily and without delay” in light of evidence indicating the retraction only occurred after he was confronted with evidence that he was a citizen of France. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Jan 07, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/03/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Diaz, Daniel W. Esq Law Oice of Dani W. Diaz P.O Box 4584 Sunnyside NY 1104 Name: MARTINMCKAEL
 p f 
Executive Oce r Immgraton Reiew
Bd  Ign Als Oc  h lk
 5107
leesburg Pike. Suite
2000
Fa Church, Vrina
20530
HS/ICE Oic o Chie Counse
NYC 26 Fderal Plza, 11th Floor New Yok NY 0278  A 076-549-309 a of this noice: 1227 2013
Enclosed is a opy of the Board's deciion and order i the above-rereed case. Enclosure
 Mb: Py 
Snceely,
D
c
t
Donna Ca Cef lek
schwarzA
 k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Mickael Christian Martin, A076 549 309 (BIA Dec. 27, 2013)
 
·
U.S. D
p
tmt f Jtc
ExeJtive Oce
r
lmmigatoQ.Revew Decison of he Bod of Imaon Apeas
Fas
Curc, Vrga
2050
Fi: A076 49 309 -w Yor,  ate n r CKAL CHRSTAN MARN ak.a Mha Mrn N REOVAL PROCEEGS APPEAL ON BEHALF O RSPODENT D W iaz Esqure O BHA O HS Caro oor Assistant Chf Cons CHARG
DEC 2 7 013
ote Se 237a)()(A), &N At [8 SC § 1227(a)()A] nadmssibe at tme of ntr or adjustmnt of staus under stio 212(a)6)(C) &N At [8 U.SC § 1182a6C))] -Frau or wi misreprsenttion of a matra t (sustand) S 237a)()(A,
&N
At [8 S.C § 1227a))(A] -nadmssib at tm of entr or adustment o sts ndr stion 212(a7AI,
l&N
At [8 USC. § 182(a)7A)(] mmgrant no vad mmiant vsa or ent doument sustaied) S 237(a)(3)),
&N
At [8 S.C. § 1227(a)3)D] -as m of Untd States itzensp not sustai) APLCATON Teination Th rspondent, a native and tizen of rane, appas ·the mmgraton Judge's Otobr , 201 sion nding him rmovab d ordrng m removd to Fran. The appa wi b dsmssd The Bo revews an mmigraton Judg's ndgs o t, inuing redb dtrminatons and undr the aw of th Cruit wth jursditon over ths s) the ikehood o tur vnts undr a "ar roous stanrd8 CF. § 1003.d3)();
ee Hung
v.
Hode
77   d Cir 20 e reviw a othr issues, nuding uestions of aw,  udgment, or dsreton, undr a de novo stnd. 8 CR § 1003 d)3)ii). The mmigration Jug dd not ar e in nding that n 99 th respondnt fase aimd that h w a Unitd Stats itizn in an eor to gain ent ito  Untd Stats and that he id not retrat this se aim of itzenshp nti aer mmigration agnts onontd m with ination om omputer rords tat indiatd he was  t a tizn o rne J. at 4-, 8. Atough the respondnt ondes hat h se ame Unted Stats tizenship, h gues that the Depment of Homed Surit (DHS has not dmonstrat b
Cite as: Mickael Christian Martin, A076 549 309 (BIA Dec. 27, 2013)
 
A6 549 3 clear and convcg evience that his reactio of his lse statement wa ot made "oty an ithout elay so as to negate the legal eet of e lse staemet (xh 6 Responents Br at 4-5).
See Matter of Namio,
14 I&N Dec. 412 (BIA 1973) (ning that a retraction mae
year aer a aien's itia fase statement, whe it appeare hat isose of the lsity of the statemets was imminet, was neite oltay nor timey)
Matter of M-,
9 I&N ec 11 (BA 16) (ndig that a se statemen as o "lse testimony s a maer of aw becaue e alie mae a imey recntation of his o oitio a wtout delay);
Mater of
R-R,
3 &N Dec. 23 (BA 149) On apeal, the responet caims hat the vrious documets submied by the DHS in oetio ith te events of 5 cotai inteal icoisteies that undermine te DHS's claim tat he responent id not timey and vountariy react his lse statements (Respondent's B at 45 xh 4We disagreeAtough a memoraum to le pepred by an ocer ame C Raie states that the espondent "claime that his er was a naturalize citize of ane the to memorana prepare by he ocers ho apparey octe the respoet's secoary insetion, Jes Cais d Wiiam Deamate, ae in agreemet that the resoe caime ta his her was a nauraie Ute States ciien,  Ofcer Deamater' s memorm iicate that te respoe caime his te as aso a eh citize (x 4. Wile Ofcer Raine's memorandm is icosistet ith the memorna prepe by Ofcers Cais n eater, te Racine memoradum a ate 3 day aer he respoents primar and seconday inspections ad appears in the nature of a s
u
ary of the etire encounter Accoringy, tis incosistency does not sigicaty udeie te proatie alue of these docments Similarly, alhough Ofcer Cais's memoraum appers to be an icorrect ate, e n that this icosistey does ot erie the cotents of the memornum, namey the asseio hat the respoet i no reat his fase cam of itizenship uti ae he was pesente w eiece of is lsiy (x 4) The respondent oes not  rmatiely ispute he DHS's asseion that he reacte his lse itieship cam ony ae beig cononte with te DHS s eiee tha he a not a Uite Staes citizen. Instea, the respondet submite a adait which sates the lloig: "At he boer post,  initially to an oce hat  was a ited States citien Later,  tod the ocer that I w a citizen of France (xh 6 at 4) Given he DHS's eidence conceig the eouter of Augst 5, 1995, n in the absee of n amatie accout by the espoet conceig e events ch led up to is recantation of his false itizesip claim, we n o ero i the mmigratio Jge's olsio that te responet i not vouiy a timey rea his se satemet (I.J at  erere, we agree ih the mmigration uge tat he respodent is removable  having been inamissible at the time of hs adjutme of status der setios 212(a)(6)(C(i) ad 12(a)(7(A)(i(I) of the mmigration and Natioaliy Act, SC §§ 12(a)(6)(C)(i, (a(7)(A(i)(I Accorigly, the responent's appeal il be ismisse ORDE he appeal is ismisse. 2
Cite as: Mickael Christian Martin, A076 549 309 (BIA Dec. 27, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->