Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
4Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
14-01-06 Motorola Mobility Reply Brief in Appeal of Wisconsin FRAND Dismissal

14-01-06 Motorola Mobility Reply Brief in Appeal of Wisconsin FRAND Dismissal

Ratings: (0)|Views: 11,555 |Likes:
Published by Florian Mueller

More info:

Published by: Florian Mueller on Jan 08, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/14/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 Appeal Nos. 2013-1150, -1182
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
APPLE INC.,
 Plaintiff-Appellant 
, v. MOTOROLA
 
MOBILITY
 
LLC,
 Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant 
, Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in No. 11-CV-0178, Senior Judge Barbara B. Crabb
REPLY BRIEF OF DEFENDANT-APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC
David A. Nelson Stephen A. Swedlow Q
UINN
E
MANUEL
U
RQUHART
&
 
S
ULLIVAN
,
 
LLP 500 W. Madison St., Suite 2450 Chicago, IL 60661 (312) 705-7400 Kathleen M. Sullivan Edward J. DeFranco Q
UINN
E
MANUEL
U
RQUHART
&
 
S
ULLIVAN
,
 
LLP 51 Madison Ave., 22nd Floor  New York, NY 10010 (212) 849-7000 Brian C. Cannon Q
UINN
E
MANUEL
U
RQUHART
&
 
S
ULLIVAN
,
 
LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 (650) 801-5000
 Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee-Cross- Appellant
Case: 13-1150 Document: 75 Page: 1 Filed: 01/06/2014
 
 
ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Page
Cases
 Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. BMW of North America, Inc.
, 501 F.3d 1274 (Fed. Cir. 2007) ............................................................................ 4
 Barnhill v. United States
, 11 F.3d 1360, 1370 (7th Cir. 1993) ...................................................................... 2
Sicom Systems, Ltd. v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
, 427 F.3d 971 (Fed. Cir. 2005) .............................................................................. 5
Chattanooga Mfg., Inc. v. Nike, Inc.,
301 F.3d 789, 796 (7th Cir. 2002)
 ........................................................................ 5 Crowe ex. rel. Crowe v. Zeigler Coal Co.
, 646 F.3d 435 (7th Cir. 2011) ................................................................................ 3
 Franzoni v. Hartmarx Corp.
, 300 F.3d 767 (7th Cir. 2002) ................................................................................ 4
 Franzoni v. Hartmarx Corp.
,  No. 99 C 4898, 2001 WL 243394 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 12, 2001) ................................ 4
Gander Mountain Co. v. Cabela
’ 
 s, Inc.
,  No. 04 CV 3125 PJS/RLE, 2007 WL 2026751 (D.Minn. Jul. 10, 2007) ............. 3
 Harris v. Quinn
, 656 F.3d 692 (7th Cir. 2011) ................................................................................ 5
University of Pittsburgh v. Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
, 569 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 2009) ............................................................................ 4
Wakefield v. Northern Telecom, Inc.
, 769 F.2d 109 (2d Cir. 1985) ................................................................................. 2
Walczak v. Board of Education
,  No. 11 C 8409, 2012 WL 3134351 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 1, 2012) .............................. 3
Statutes
Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(1) ........................................................................................ 4 Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(7) ........................................................................................ 4 Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 19 .................................................................................................. 4
Case: 13-1150 Document: 75 Page: 3 Filed: 01/06/2014

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->