Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
CME0001

CME0001

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,379 |Likes:
Published by Kyriesunset
Legal Memorandum of Points and Authorities re TRO, Preliminary Injunction and Full Faith and Credit
Legal Memorandum of Points and Authorities re TRO, Preliminary Injunction and Full Faith and Credit

More info:

Published by: Kyriesunset on Sep 15, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

09/17/2009

pdf

text

original

 
r-
6
78(1.)Whetheratemporaryrestrainingorderorpreliminaryinjunctionare"orders" thataretobegivenfullfaithandcreditundertheUniformEnforcementofForeign JudgmentAct(A.R.S.§§12-1701etseq.);
MichaelK.Jeanes,ClerkofCo
t
***
ElectronicallyFiled
***
LoriCummings FilingID419002 9/9/200910:16:04AM
1
Angel"Bacha"Vega#023036
DODGE
&
VEGA,
PLC
2
4824E.BaselineRd.,Suite124 Mesa,Arizona85206
3
Telephone:(480)656-8333 Facsimile:(480)656-8334
4
bachorq)dodgevcga
law.com
5
AttorneysforPlaintiffs,Respondents,NEDRARONEYMcKELL,ROBERTMcKELL
INTHESUPERIORCOURTOFTHESTATEOFARIZONAINANDFORTHECOUNTYOFMARICOPA
GARYWHITING,anindividual,etaI.,
13
Defendants,Petitioners.
JudicialAssignment:
TheHonorableKarenPotts
9
NEDRARONEYMCKELL,andROBERT MCKELL,husbandandwife,
1014
~--------------------------------~
15
16
1718192021
22
23
24
25
26
1112
CaseNo.CV2009-093004Plaintiffs,Respondents
MEMORANDUMOFPOINTSANDAUTHORITIESRETRO,PRELIMINARYINJUNCTIONANDFULLFAITHANDCREDIT
s.
PursuanttotheCourt'srulingandMinuteEntryOrderofSeptember1,2009, PlaintiffsRobandNedraRoneyMcKell,byandthroughcounselDodge
&
Vega,PLC, herebyfiletheirBriefonEnforcementofanOrderofaForeignCourt.
INTRODUCTION
ThismattercamebeforetheCourtonDefendantGaryWhiting'sMotionfor EmergencyHearingandStayofEnforcementofForeignJudgmentonSeptember1,2009. Afteroralargument,theCourtrequestedadditionalbriefmgontheissuesof:
 
12345678910
-e-
11
'-l-
.JB-.o
~·5~
12
telllr)
CJ.JOO
~O::~
;,"0
13
"N
l:l:.=·c
~~<
c~~
14
§ui~
c...
N
0()
15
e-
1617181920212223242526(2.)WhetheratemporaryReceiverorderissubjecttotheUniformEnforcementofForeignJudgmentAct;and(3.)WhetherDefendant'sargumentthattheUtahTemporaryRestrainingOrderwas obtainedbyfraudcouldbeentertainedinthisCourt.PlaintiffssubmitthefollowinginresponsetotheCourt'srequestforadditionalbriefing.
BACKGROUND
FACTS
1.OnAugust3,2009,PlaintiffsfiledtheirFirstAmendedComplaintandMotion forTemporaryRestrainingOrderintheFourthJudicialDistrictCourtoftheStateofUtah.SeeTranscriptofAugust21,2009hearingatp.ll,attachedas
"Exhibit
A."2.Atthattime,JudgeClaudiaLaycocksetahearingdatefortheMotionforTemporaryRestrainingOrderforAugust21,2009.SeeId. 3.OnAugust10,2009andAugust11,2009,alldefendantsnamedintheUtah actionwereservedwiththeFirstAmendedComplaintandMotionforTemporaryRestrainingOrder.SeeId.atp.13-16.4.OnAugust21,2009,JudgeClaudiaLaycockoftheFourthJudicialDistrict,State ofUtah,heldahearingonPlaintiffs'MotionforTemporaryRestrainingOrder. 5.Defendants'counsel,GaryHenrieappearedforthelimitedpurposeofrequesting acontinuanceofthehearingsoastopermitadditionaltimeforDefendants'Arizonacounsel tobeadmitted
prohacvice.
Id.atp.4.
-2-
 
12345678910
...
11
u-
....;,J~\O
=-':;
0
12
-CIlC"-t
«
.;,2
~~~
;,;..v
0
13
N
~:.:'C
~~<
"ee~
a:l'"
14
§ui~
Q...
N
ee
15
e-
16171819202122232425266.JudgeLaycockconsideredtheargumentspresentedbycounselanddeniedthemotiontocontinuethehearingbasedonthefactthatallDefendantshadbeenproperlyservedandthemotionforacontinuancewasfiledjustpriortothehearing.Id.atp.18-19.7.BasedontheuncontestedallegationsmadeinPlaintiffs'motion,theCourtgrantedPlaintiffsMotionforTemporaryRestrainingOrder.Id.atp.29 8.JudgeLaycockalsoappointedaReceivertotakecontrolofandpreservethecompanies.Id.atp.24-27.9.PlaintiffsfiledthisorderwiththeArizonaSuperiorCourt,MaricopaCountyon August24,2009,promptingDefendantGaryWhiting'spendingmotion.
ARGUMENTI.ATEMPORARYRESTRAININGORDERISAJUDICIALPROCEEDINGTHATWARRANTSFULLFAITHANDCREDITUNDERTHEUNIFORMENFORCEMENTOFFOREIGNJUDGMENTSACT
InJonesv.Roach,theCourtofAppealsofArizona,DivisionOne,DepartmentB reviewedtheenforcementofaColoradojudgmentintheArizonacourts.575P.2d345(1977).TheCourtwasaskedtodeterminewhetheraforeignjudgmentwassubjecttocollateralattackunderAriz.R.Civ.P.60(c).TheCourtdeliberatedthepurposeofthe UniformEnforcementofForeignJudgmentsAct(A.R.S.§§12-1701etseq.)anddetermined that"inherentinanydiscussionofA.R.S.§12-1702isthatitisonlyfinaljudgmentsofa sisterstatethatareentitledtofullfaithandcredit."575P.2dat348.TheCourtreliedon
-3-

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->