Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Jozef Szypulski, A099 030 552 (BIA Dec. 30, 2013)

Jozef Szypulski, A099 030 552 (BIA Dec. 30, 2013)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 239|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine the factual basis for the respondent’s non-receipt of the hearing notice. The Board noted that the record reflected that both the Notice to Appear (NTA) and order of removal issued in absentia were returned as undeliverable. The decision was written by Member Edward Grant.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine the factual basis for the respondent’s non-receipt of the hearing notice. The Board noted that the record reflected that both the Notice to Appear (NTA) and order of removal issued in absentia were returned as undeliverable. The decision was written by Member Edward Grant.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Jan 10, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/04/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Sommer awrence E Atorney At aw 9100 Wet Painfied Road Brookfied I 60513 Name: SZYPSKI JEF
 Dptmt of Jut
Executive Oc r Immigration Rview
Board of Immigration Apeals Q{c of h Clk
 Lsbrg Pke St  F Chc Vrg 
OSCE ice of Cef Coune -CHI 525 Wet Van Buren Street Chicago  60607 A 99-03552 Date of thi notce: 2 /3020 3
closd is a copy of the Board's decsio ad order  the above-rernce cas. cosre
Pel ebes Gra dward R
Scere, Doa Carr he Cerk
 see 
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Jozef Szypulski, A099 030 552 (BIA Dec. 30, 2013)
 
SZYPULSKI, JF A099030552 3351 N. Normandy CCG  60634 Nme: SZPSKI J
U Dptmt of Jut
ee Oe  go Reew
Boa o mmgaon Apeals Oce o he Clek
507
Leesburg Pik, S1l

Fa Chc Vina
253
OSCE ice of Chie Cousel CHI 525 West Van Buen treet Cicago, IL 60607  099030552 Date of tis otice 2 /3020 3
losed s  opy of he ods deso  the boe-eeed ase Ths opy s beg poded o yo s  ouesy You oey o epeseie hs bee seed wh hs deso ps o
8
F R § 1292() f e thed deso odes h you be emoed om e Ue Saes o as a gao Jdge's eson odeg a yo be emoe y eo  eew o e aaed esio ms be e w d eeed by e ppopiae ou o peas n

das o e dae o e deison ose
Pel ebes Gra dward R
nee
D
c
Don  hie ek
ygc  ck
Cite as: Jozef Szypulski, A099 030 552 (BIA Dec. 30, 2013)
 

  
Executive Oce r Iiation Review Decison of the Board  maio Appeals Fas Church, Vigiia
20530
Fie: A099 030 552 -Chicago, IL In re: JOZEF SZYPULSKI IN REMOAL PROCEEDINGS APPE Date: ON BEHALF OF SPONDEN Lawence E ommers Esure ON BELF OF DHS: CHARGE: essica Galassi Assistan Chie ounse  Notice: Sec 237(a )( )(B), &N Act [8 USC
§
127(a )()(B)] In the Unied tates in vioation o aw APPLICATION: Reopening
DEC 
20\
The respondent has appeae the Immigration Judges decsion date Jue 6, 203, enyng s motion to reopen Te Imiation Judge ad previously ordered the respondents removal om the nted ttes, owing e resondents aiure o appe r a heng on Feary 6, 008 he record wil e remande We revew a mmigration Judges ndngs o ct r clear eor, ut uestions o law, discretion, and judgment and all other ssues n appeals are revewed de novo. 8 CF.R
§§
003(d)(3(i),(ii On appea the responent contens tat the adress on te Notice to Appear was not coect, d e never receved e notice o the eang, togh o t o is ow He states er tat he reside at 355 N Norany, Chcago, inois 60634, at the time o te hearng, and tat tis is the adress e provided to te Depament o Homean Secuiy upon is reease om custody n ay 2007 e Immigration Judge un tha te resonen can e charge wit recep o the noice o eang ecause t was set o s ast
o
adress an e ae o ove hs new aess o te Immigration Cou aer eing served wit te Notice to Appear. e detemine ta te resoents moton to reopen did no provide y explation why the heing notice was reted as neverae, an that due to te ack o inrmation, concude that te respondent ntentionally made hmse unavaale r his hering and can e chge wth receip o e eaing otce
Cite as: Jozef Szypulski, A099 030 552 (BIA Dec. 30, 2013)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->