Perry Reed Clark (argued), Palo Alto, California, for Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant–Appellant.John Lawrence Slafsky (argued), David L. Lansky, and EvanM.W. Stern, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto,California, for Defendant-counter-claimant–Appellee.Ian Charles Ballon and Lori Chang, Greenberg Traurig, LLP,Los Angeles, California, for Amicus Curiae eNom, Inc.Aaron M. McKown and Paula L. Zecchini, Wrenn Bender LLP, Irvine, California, for Amici Curiae Network Solutions,LLC and Register.com, Inc.
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:In this appeal, Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas)requests that we read a cause of action for contributorycybersquatting into the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA or Act), 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d). Becausewe conclude that neither the plain text nor the purpose of theACPA provide support for such a cause of action, we holdthat there is none. We therefore affirm the judgment of thedistrict court.
FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
Petrolium Nasional Berhad (Petronas) is a major oil andgas company with its headquarters in Kuala Lumpur,