Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
CW v WARF - Appellant Order Brief (ECF)

CW v WARF - Appellant Order Brief (ECF)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 23 |Likes:
Published by Daniel Ravicher
CW v WARF - Appellant Order Brief (ECF)
CW v WARF - Appellant Order Brief (ECF)

More info:

Published by: Daniel Ravicher on Jan 12, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/08/2014

pdf

text

original

 
2013-1377_______________IN THEUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT_______________CONSUMER WATCHDOG,(formerly known as The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights),
 
 Appellant,
v.
 
WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION,
 Appellee.
_______________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office,Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination 95/000,154.
_______________BRIEF OF APPELLANT IN RESPONSE TO ORDER_______________
Daniel B. RavicherSabrina Y. HassanPublic Patent FoundationBenjamin N. Cardozo School of Law55 Fifth Avenue, Ste. 901New York, New York 10003(212) 790-0442November 25, 2013
Counsel for Appellant 
Case: 13-1377 CASE PARTICIPANTS ONLY Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 11/25/2013
Case: 13-1377 Document: 34 Page: 1 Filed: 11/26/2013
 
CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST
Counsel for Appellant Consumer Watchdog certifies the following:1.The full name of every party or amicus represented by me is: Consumer Watchdog2.The name of the real party in interest (if the party named in the caption is not the real party in interest) represented by me is: NONE3.All parent corporations and any publicly held companies that own 10 percent or more of the stock of the party or amicus curiae represented by me are: NONE4.The names of all law firms and the partners or associates that appeared for the party or amicus now represented by me in the trial court or agency or are expected to appear in this court are: Daniel B. Ravicher, Sabrina Hassan, Public Patent FoundationDated: November 25, 2013/s/ Daniel B. Ravicher Daniel B. Ravicheri
Case: 13-1377 CASE PARTICIPANTS ONLY Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 11/25/2013
Case: 13-1377 Document: 34 Page: 2 Filed: 11/26/2013
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PageCERTIFICATE OF INTEREST.................................................................................iTABLE OF CONTENTS..........................................................................................iiTABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................................iiiARGUMENT.............................................................................................................1I.STATUTES GIVING THIRD-PARTY
 INTER PARTES 
 REEXAMINATION REQUESTERS THE PROCEDURAL RIGHT TO APPEAL ADVERSE PTO DECISIONS ALSO PROVIDE THEM STANDING TO DO SO..........1A.A Statutory Procedural Right To Seek Court Review Provides Standing................................................................................................2B.Two Statutes Expressly Give CW A Procedural Right To Appeal........6CONCLUSION........................................................................................................10CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.................................................................................11CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE.......................................................................12ii
Case: 13-1377 CASE PARTICIPANTS ONLY Document: 30 Page: 3 Filed: 11/25/2013
Case: 13-1377 Document: 34 Page: 3 Filed: 11/26/2013

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->