Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
Kerchner et al v Obama et al2
Amended Verified Complaint Amendment Filed 9 February 2009Original Lawsuit Filed 2:50 a.m. 20 January 2009Table of Contents
Title Page 1Jurisdiction and Venue 2Parties 3Introduction 6Nature of Action 6The Constitutional Republic 9Not an Article II “Natural Born Citizen” 10Not Born in the U.S.A. 10Obama’s Father Not a U.S. Citizen 17(Obama Sr. and Obama Jr. Born as British Subjects)Obama’s Adoption (Obama Becomes Indonesian Citizen) 18Obama May Be an Illegal Alien 18The Lack of Vetting of ObamaThe Vetting of Obama on Behalf of the Plaintiffs andthe People 19
 
Vetting by the Democratic National Committee(DNC) on Behalf of the Plaintiffs and the People 19(DNC provides 2 different versions of its Certificationof Nomination Certificates, signed & attested to by NancyPelosi, to the several states. One to Hawaii with statement of Constitutional eligibility and other states without that statement.See more details about Hawaii in Endnote 16 on page 78.)Vetting by the Secretaries of State on Behalf of the Plaintiffs and the People 20Vetting by the Federal Election Commission onBehalf of the Plaintiffs and the People 21Vetting by the Media on Behalf of the Plaintiffsand the People 21Vetting by the Commission on Presidential Debates(CPD) on Behalf of the Plaintiffs and the People 22Vetting by the Electoral College on Behalf of thePlaintiffs and the People 24Vetting Through Litigation on Behalf of the Plaintiff and the People 24When Obama was “Elected” President 25Vetting by Congress on Behalf of the Plaintiffsand the People. Congress Listens to People and VetsMcCain but Does NOT Listen to People to Vet Obama 26Vetting McCain with U.S. Senate Resolution SR 511 26April 2008 at the Request of the We the People butDoing Nothing to Vet Obama’s Eligibiltiy. SeeENDNOTE 23 for greater details.Cheney Did Not Call for the Objections as is 34Required by Statute 3 USC 15
 
The Continuing Efforts by Litigants to GatherInformation Regarding Barack Hussein Obama IIon Behalf of the Plaintiffs and the People 35Questions Remain Unanswered Regarding theIdentity of Obama 35The Presidential Inauguration 35Obama’s Waiver of His Privacy Rights in HisCertificate of Live Birth (BC) 36Irreparable Harm and Causes of Action 36Count I: First Amendment-Abridged Right toPetition the Government v. Non-Obama Defendants 37
THE NON-OBAMA DEFENDANTS VIOLATED PLAINTIFF KERCHNER’SRIGHTS UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT BY ABRIDGING HIS RIGHTS TOPETITION HIS GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES WHENTHEY UNJUSTIFIABLY FAILED TO ADDRESS AND IGNORED PLAINTIFF’SPETITIONS TO THEM TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER OR NOT OBAMA ISAN ARTICLE II “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” AND QUALIFIED TO BEPRESIDENT AND COMMANDER IN CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES
Count II: Fifth Amendment-Procedural Due Processv. Non-Obama Defendants 39
THE NON-OBAMA DEFENDANTS VIOLATED PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTHAMENDMENT RIGHTS BY DEPRIVING THEM OF A LIBERTY INTERESTWITHOUT PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS OF LAW BY FAILING UNDERTHE PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES OF THE TWENTIETH AMENDMENT AND3 U.S.C. 15 TO AFFORD PLAINTIFFS AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARDTHROUGH THEIR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES AND BY FAILING TOCONDUCT AN APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION ANDHEARING ON WHETHER OBAMA WAS BORN IN THE UNITED STATESAND WHETHER HE IS AN ARTICLE II “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” ANDQUALIFIED TO BE PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER IN CHIEF THEREOF
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User