Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Manuel de Jesus Chavarria-Lopez, A089 823 873 (BIA Dec. 15, 2011)

Manuel de Jesus Chavarria-Lopez, A089 823 873 (BIA Dec. 15, 2011)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 52|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reversed the denial of the respondent’s motion to suppress and remanded for further consideration. The Board held that the motion should not have been denied without a hearing in light of the allegations that the respondent was mistakenly arrested by a local police officer under an arrest warrant that did not pertain to the respondent and subsequently questioned by immigration officers. The decision was written by Member Anne Greer.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reversed the denial of the respondent’s motion to suppress and remanded for further consideration. The Board held that the motion should not have been denied without a hearing in light of the allegations that the respondent was mistakenly arrested by a local police officer under an arrest warrant that did not pertain to the respondent and subsequently questioned by immigration officers. The decision was written by Member Anne Greer.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center on Jan 13, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/13/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Hess, Theodore G. Esq Hess
&
Schube LLP 804 Colorado Ave 2nd Floor Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
US Depatment  ustice
Execuive Oce r Immigration Review
Board of Immigration Appeals ce of he lerk
5107 Leebu Pke, Sut 2000 Fals Churc. Vrgnia 2204
HS/ICE Oice of Chief Counsel -DEN 12445 East Caley Avenue Centennial CO 80111-5663 Name: CHAVARRIALOPEZ, MANUE DE JESUS A089823873 Date of this notice 12/15/2011
Enclosed is a copy of he Board's decision and order in he above-rerenced case. Encosure Pane Members: Greer Anne
J
Sincere, Donna Car Chief Cerk
Cite as: Manuel De Jesus Chavarria-Lopez, A089 823 873 (BIA Dec. 15, 2011)
 
USDeparentofJusice
Executi.ve Oe for Imgaton Revew Decson of te Board ofmgaton Appeals Fs Chch,
ginia
041
File: A89 823 873 -Dever, CO
e MANUEL DE JESUS CHVAALOPEZ
MOVAL PROCEEDGS AEA  Date ON BA O RESONDENT  Theode G. ess squire ON BE O DHS: CARG  Natha  erbet Assistt Cief Csel
DEC 1& ZOU
 Notice Sec 212(a)(6)()(i) &N Act [8 USC
§
1182(a)(6)( A)(i)] reset without beig admitted  pled LICATION Teiatio he espodet, a ative d ciize f El Sado appeas te Immiatio Jdge's eb 22 201, ·decisi deyg he respodes Mti t Suppress We evie the ao udges factual digs r ce er d all oe isses
 de novo See
8 CFR
§
103 1 ( d)(3) Te case  be remaded
I
INS v Lopez-Mndoza
468 US 132, 1551 (198), the Supreme Co hed that the exsio e f the h Amedet is eeay t csided applicabe i remoa preedigs
 See lso Maer of Sandovl
17 &N Dec 7 BA 1979);
 Maer o Grcia,
17 &N Dec 319 321BIA9);
 Mater o/Toro
17 &N Dec 3 33 IA 1980) Ee if e orth Amedmets pteti agaist ueasoae seches ad seizs is iated the restig eidece ill e suppessed ly e the costital ioatis re "eegious
 See INS v. Lopezendoza supr
e gidig priciple is whethe the csiderati o te eidece sesses Fi Amemet tis f defaiess
 See Mater o/Sdoval  sra.
 Edece soud be suss ly e the crd tablishes e existece f "egius lats of he ou Aedmet o e libes at mit sess oos f deta fess d dne the pbave ue of e eidece obtaid
 See opezMendozsra
at 155
I
e crimia cotext whee, ulike i rem prceegs, he excsio le  the Fur Amedet is lly appicabe a sech coducted wihut a  t issed upo poabe case is "per se reasabe
 See Schneckoth v Bustamonte
12 US 218 219 (1973)
exceptio t tis geeral e is whe a pes ith atrity has ie volutry set to the seach
 See Schnecoth . Bustante supr
at 223 Tat ecep applies eually
remval proceedigs here we ae euired t assess wheer a seach iated the
Cite as: Manuel De Jesus Chavarria-Lopez, A089 823 873 (BIA Dec. 15, 2011)
 
 A089 823 873  Fouh medme ad whehe hat vioatio ws "eeous, theeby justg e excusio of evdece
 See Luevano v Hoder,
660 3d 1207, 1212 (1th C. 2011)
I
emoval pocedigs,  le seekig he exclusio o evidece basd o he oh edme bes he bude o esablsg a
 prmaace
e ha edece sold be suppessed
 See aer oang,
3 I&N Dec 61 (B 171 ) he eques o exclude evidece shoud be mde va a moto to suppess ha s suppoted by   davit o ohe obecve edece a expls why suppesso is appopiate
 See aer o Wong,
13 I&N Dec 820, 822 (BI 1971) The adait mst cota specic, deaied satemes based o e pesol owdge o he  
 See aer o ang, supra; aer oBarcen,
19 IN Dec 609 (IA 188) O whe  alie  ome d wh adeuae edece  suppo o suppessio w e bde s o he Depet o Homeld Scu DS) o  e mne i whch  obed e evde
 See aer o Barcen, supra
a 611
I
hs cse, the espode d a moio to suppess statig hat, e a ac accdet, he w resed by a polce oce i Pachue, Coloado, bed o  res wr ssued  Caliia  Ae  the espode's rest, i ws deemd hat the espode w o e peso  whom e wr w issud Noeheess, he espode wa questoed ove e phoe y  oce of e Imiao d uoms Eoceme (ICE) d he espode was subseuet e o ICE cusody
 See
Ex 2 O appeal, he espode aues ha he Immiaio Judge ed  deyg  the espode's moto o suppess withou a heig
 See
Respode's Bef at 3-4 We aee
I
his decisio, the Imiaio udge d ha the espodet's aest was complicaed by the ac ha he espodet was esed o a wrt d it ws ate deem tha the w dd o peta o the espode (I at 23) The espodet w oeheess quesoed by mgao oces Wihou mg cul dgs, the mmato udge cocudd a hee ws o eegous coduct o beha o the aw eceme oces  s cae, e espodes moio to suppess was volous, d hee was o bass  suppessg the espode's staemet (I at 2, 3) Because hese coclusos e ot suppoed wh adeuate ca digs, howeve, we wl ead ths case to he Immao udge  addioal cdg
 See aer oH
23 I&N ec 62, 465 (BI 2002) (give he Bod's limied cg co, i s "ceasgly mpo  he Imiao udge o make ce d compee dgs o act hat
suppoted by he ecod d  compice wth coollg aw) e aso oe ha he esode gues o appeal tha hs statemes sould
b
suppessed because he w o oed o hs h ude 8 CFR
§
2873(c) upo hs res
 See
Repode's Bie a 4 Despe hs e, howeve, we have held hat  ae who s resed wthou a wra is ot eiled o advisals u he o she is paced i a poceegs
ee  atter oERF
&
AS
25 IN ec 580, 83 (B 2011);
 see also
8 CFR
§
287(c) ( lie esed iou wr
a ped rm pree
de secio
28 or

of
 c wl e adsed o e esos  his o he res d he  o e epeseed a o expese o he Goeet) (emphs added) O md, e Imaio udge so me he es aal dgs o deee whethe e eqed adsas wee povded ccodgy, he  og ode will be eeed
Cite as: Manuel De Jesus Chavarria-Lopez, A089 823 873 (BIA Dec. 15, 2011)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->