Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Drew Peterson: Murder conviction appeal

Drew Peterson: Murder conviction appeal

Ratings: (0)|Views: 6,632 |Likes:
Published by Justice Café
IN THE
APPELLATE COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,

Appeal from the Circuit Court
Plaintiff-Appellee, ) of the 12th Judicial Circuit
) Will County, Illinois
)
v. ) Indictment No.: 09 CF 1048
))
DREW PETERSON, ) Honorable Edward Burmilla, Jr.
Defendant-Appellant. ) Judge Presiding

BRIEF AND ARGUMENT FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
IN THE
APPELLATE COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,

Appeal from the Circuit Court
Plaintiff-Appellee, ) of the 12th Judicial Circuit
) Will County, Illinois
)
v. ) Indictment No.: 09 CF 1048
))
DREW PETERSON, ) Honorable Edward Burmilla, Jr.
Defendant-Appellant. ) Judge Presiding

BRIEF AND ARGUMENT FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More info:

Categories:Business/Law
Published by: Justice Café on Jan 14, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/24/2014

pdf

text

original

 
NO. 3:13-0157 _______________________________________________________________________  _ IN THEAPPELLATE COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOISTHIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICTPEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,) Appea !"#$ %&e C'"('% C#"%Pa'*%'!!-Appeee,) #! %&e 1+
%&
 J'('a C'"('%) ' C#*%, I'*#'/).) I*'(%$e*% N#.: 0CF 102))DRE PETERSON, ) H#*#"a4e Ea" 6"$'a, J".De!e*a*%-Appea*%.) Je P"e/''*) 
6RIEF AND AR8U9ENT FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
C#*/e !#" De!e*a*%-Appea*%:
STEEN A. 8REEN6ER8HAROLD J. ;RENTSTEEN A. 8REEN6ER8 AND ASSOC., LTD.CHICA8O-;ENT COLLE8E OF LA53 . JAC;SON 6OULEARD, SUITE 1+<05<5 EST ADA9S STREETCHICA8O, ILLINOIS <0<02CHICA8O, ILLINOIS <0035=31+) 7-500O! C#*/e:JOHN . HEIDERSCHEIDTANDRES. 8A6LE703 SOUTH DEAR6ORN STREET330 S. ELLS STREET, SUITE 200FCHICA8O, ILLINOIS <0<05CHICA8O, ILLINOIS <0<0<
ORAL AR8U9ENT RE>UESTED
 
TA6LE OF CONTENTSPOINTS AND AUTHORITIES ????????????????..???.'-'NATURE OF THE CASE ?????????????????????....1JURISDICTION ??????????????????????.??..?1STATE9ENT OF FACTS ?????????????????.????.1-1+AR8U9ENTI. DRE AS DENIED A FAIR TRIAL HEN ATTORNE@ HARR@ S9ITH TESTIFIED A6OUT A PRIILE8ED CONERSATION ITH STAC@ THAT HAD 6EEN RULED INAD9ISSI6LE, AND AS HEARSA@ OPINION INSINUATIN8 DRE AS 8UILT@ OF 9URDER.???????????????????????????????13
II.
DRES PRINCIPAL ATTORNE@, 6@ SI8NIN8 A 9EDIA RI8HTS CONTRACT HEN RETAINED, CREATED A
PER SE
 CONFLICT.????????????????????????????..??+1III.THE TRIAL COURT ERRED AS A 9ATTER OF LA IN AD9ITTIN8 PASTOR SCHORIS TESTI9ON@, 6OTH AT THE FORFEITURE 6@ RON8DOIN8 HEARIN8 AND AT TRIAL, IN CONTRAENTION OF THE CLER8@ PRIILE8E DOCTRINE.?????????????????????????????..?+<I.THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN AD9ITTIN8 INTO EIDENCE, IA THE FORFEITURE 6@ RON8DOIN8 DOCTRINE, HEARSA@ STATE9ENTS THAT THE COURT HAD PREIOUSL@ FOUND UNRELIA6LE.??????????????????????????????.32
 
.THE TRIAL COURT A6USED ITS DISCRETION IN AD9ITTIN8 JEFFRE@ PACHTERS TESTI9ON@ 6ECAUSE THE STATE FAILED TO PROIDE PROPER NOTICE OF THE TESTI9ON@ UNDER RULE 202=4), HICH AS PREJUDICIAL PROPENSIT@ EIDENCE.??????????????????????????????..25I.DRE AS NOT PROED 8UILT@ 6E@OND A REASONA6LE DOU6T??????????????????????????????..2II.THE CU9ULATIE ERRORS DENIED DEFENDANT HIS RI8HT TO A FAIR TRIAL AND CAST DOU6T UPON THE INTE8RIT@ OF THIS PROCEEDIN8. ????????????????????????.????.??..5+CONCLUSION ??????????????????????????..52CERTIFICATE OF CO9PLIANCE ?????????????????55APPENDIB =U*e" Sepa"a%e C#e")

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->