STATE OF MICHIGANIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNEITALO M. PARISE, Case No. 09-007370-CZHon. Michael F. SapalaPlaintiff,vs.DETROIT ENTERTAINMENT, L.L.C.,d/b/a MOTORCITY CASINODefendant._____________________________________________________________________________/ Frank A. Cusumano, Jr. (P42781) Patricia Nemeth (P37004)Attorney for the Plaintiff Deborah Brouwer (P34872)4000 Crooks Road #100A Louis Eble (P59368)Royal Oak, MI. 48073 Attorney for the Defendant(248) 288-8760 200 Talon Centre Dr., Ste 200Fax: 248-786-6921 Detroit, MI. 48207Email:cusumanolaw@gmail.com(313) 567-5921_____________________________________________________________________________/

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief to Defendant’s ResponseBrief in Opposition to Plaintiff’sMotion for Summary Disposition

Introduction

The Michigan Gaming Control Revenue Act (MGCRA) simply does not do what thedefendant Motorcity Casino (“MC”) claims it does, or wants it to do, therefore MC asks this Court tonegate, and rewrite a clear and unambiguous statute and substitute an “iron curtain“ rule of law toprotect its financial interests which it could not do through the Proposal E Ballot Initiative and, todate, the legislative process. The Michigan Gaming Control Board (MGCB) agrees that the MGCRAdoes not apply to this case, and that legal duties and rights exist outside the MGCRA. Furthermore,MC’s arguments relative to these issues fly in the face of its own regular and constant dealing in the