association between the celebrity and thetarget product (Kamins, 1990). A celebrity associated with outdoor pursuits etc. willdrive consumer behaviour for outdoor relatedproducts (i.e. camping equipment). To further ensure that this ‘match up’ hypothesis issuccessful, the consumer would need agreater number of positive associations with that particular celebrity (Till and Nowak,2000). In addition, the ESP of a celebrity-endorsed brand would also benefit fromthe successful transfer of associated (andpositive) cultural meanings from the cele-brity (McCraken, 1989; Kapferer, 2000). For example, celebrities develop a range of different cultural meanings throughout their careers (e.g. Clint Eastwood
¼
cowboy, wes-tern movies etc.). Brands also have a rangeof cultural meanings (e.g. Earl Grey Tea
¼
Colonial India, Lemon etc.) and for an effectivecelebrity endorsement to occur the two setsof cultural meanings would have to match (Parulekar and Raheja, 2006).
Electrodermal activity (EDA) and neuromarketing
As can be seen above a more elaborate brandESP would impact on consumer preferences.However, it is not known if models who areattractive or famous afford greater or less ESPto any endorsed product. In light of the factthat celebrity and beauty are often showntogether on various brand platforms any differences in the ESP (if they exist) are likely to be very small and would benefit fromexamination with a sensitive technique; onesuch technique is measurement of an individ-ual’s electrodermal activity or EDA.The EDA, also known as the galvanic skinresponse (GSR) or the skin conductanceresponse (SCR) has a long history withinthe marketing sciences. In brief the techniqueinvolves measurement of the electrical con-ductivity of a form of fine sweating, calledeccrine sweating, that is automatically gene-rated during emotive responses, not duringthermoregulatory processes (Boucsein, 1992).Eccrine sweating only occurs on two sites onthe human body these being the palms of thehands(palmersurface)andthesolesofthefeet(plantar surface). These two sites are knowncollectively as the volar surfaces (Kuno, 1956).Early sociobiological theory suggests that wemay have evolved eccrine sweating to protectthe volar surfaces from abrasion and alsoto increase friction, which would improve our ability to grasp any object and facilitate our interaction with the immediate environmentparticularly during a threatening or rewardingevent (Darrow, 1933; Wilcott, 1966). Dueto the relatively unobtrusive nature of thetechnique the measurement of electrodermalactivity allows us to investigate differences inthe emotional responses that guide decision-making during uncertain risk and reward in arelatively ecologically valid manner (Bechara,2001; Damasio, 1994; Naqvi and Bechara,2007).This type of cognition can be described by the ‘somatic marker hypothesis,’ which statesthat stimuli (either internally or externally generated) initiate either a pleasurable or aversive sensation and these ‘somatic markers’serve to guide subsequent decision-makingbehaviour (Damasio, 1996; Bechara
et al
.,2003; Bechara
et al
., 2005). Neuropsychologi-cal studies also show that an area of the braincalled the ventromedial prefrontal cortex(VMPC) plays an important role in therepresentation of social rules and facilitatesthe influence of somatic markers on thecomputation of such rules (Damasio
et al
.,1994
;
Adolphs, 2002, 2003) while functionalneuroimaging studies of the somatic marker hypothesis show that the VMPC is active whendeciding an advantageous or preferentialchoice (Paulus and Frank, 2003). Further studies also show a functional asymmetry with the right VMPC playing a greater role inemotion based decision-making than the left(Bryden, 1982; Hiscock
et al
., 1995; Bechara
etal
., 2000).There is also evidence supportingthe presence of a right hemisphere advantagein the processing of famous faces (Fairhall andIshai,2007
)
andbeautifulfaces(Winston
etal
.,2007). The neuromarketing literature has
Copyright
#
2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Journal of Consumer Behaviour, July–October 2008
DOI: 10.1002/cb
Do fame and beauty affect consumer behaviour? 333
Add a Comment