Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
DCEA Amicus Brief

DCEA Amicus Brief

Ratings: (0)|Views: 236|Likes:
Published by Michael_Lee_Roberts
DCEA Amicus Brief
DCEA Amicus Brief

More info:

Published by: Michael_Lee_Roberts on Jan 16, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

01/17/2014

pdf

text

original

 
2004541533_1
 
EXHIBIT A
 
2004541533_1
2
SUPREME COURT STATE OF COLORADO
2 East 14th Avenue Denver, CO 80203
▲ COURT USE ONLY ▲
 Application for review pursuant to § 1-1-113(3), C.R.S., Denver District Court Case No. 2013CV34991 Case Number: 2013SA306 SCOTT GESSLER, in his official capacity as Colorado Secretary of State, Petitioner, vs.  NICOLE HANLEN, LYNN D. USSERY, JAMES H. JOY, JUNE MARIE MCNEES, KELLY L. MCNEES, KAREN MARQUEZ, MEAGAN GALBADON, and DAVID J. RODENBAUGH, Respondents
.
Thomas M. Rogers III (Atty. Reg. #28809) Eric V. Hall (Atty. Reg. #32028) Brent R. Owen (Atty. Reg. #45068) Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP 1200 Seventeenth Street, Suite 3000 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: 303.623.9000 Fax: 303.623.9222 TRogers@LRRLaw.com EHall@LRRLaw.com BOwen@LRRLaw.com 
BRIEF OF AMICUS DOUGLAS COUNTY EDUCATION ALLIANCE
 
2004541533_1
 i
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I hereby certify that this brief complies with all requirements of C.A.R. 28 and C.A.R. 32, including all formatting requirements set forth in these rules. Specifically, the undersigned certifies that: The brief complies with C.A.R. 28(g). Choose one:
 It contains 2,613 words.
 It does not exceed 30 pages. The brief complies with C.A.R. 28(k).
For the party raising the issue: It contains under a separate heading (1) a concise statement of the applicable standard of appellate review with citation to authority; and (2) a citation to the precise location in the record, not to an entire document, where the issue was raised and ruled on.
For the party responding to the issue: It contains, under a separate heading, a statement of whether such party agrees with the opponent’s statements concerning the standard of review and  preservation for appeal, and if not, why not.
 I acknowledge that my brief may be stricken if it fails to comply with any of the requirements of C.A.R. 28 and C.A.R. 32. LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER LLP
s/ Brent R. Owen
Thomas M. Rogers III (Atty. Reg. #28809) Eric V. Hall (Atty. Reg. #32028) Brent R. Owen (Atty. Reg. #45068)
 Attorneys for Amicus

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->