Devvy Kidd – Obama’s Ineligibility: How Deep Does the Corruption Go?Page 3 of 4
Hawaii UIIPA Information Request Made, Media & Freepers Alerted:http://126.96.36.199/focus/f-bloggers/2304557/posts UIPA request to Hawaii:http://188.8.131.52/focus/f-bloggers/2305448/posts Citing UIPA, I requested ALL Obama's Vital Records:http://184.108.40.206/focus/f-chat/2305734/posts And you may LIKE the rule(s) I cited
Many efforts have been made over the past few years to grease the skids.http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd430.htmI cited one in a column that has now been scrubbed from the Internet --"One year later, Sarah Herlihy, an associate at the Chicago firm of Kirkland & Ellis gets herpaper published in the Kent University Law Review on line. Herlihy claims in her paper thatthe citizenship requirement of the U.S. Constitution has been called "stupid anddiscriminating." Of course, she never tells us who makes this claim. Please note that a partnerat the same law firm was one Bruce I. Ettelson, who apparently had a working relationship onfinance committees for Obama and buffoon, Sen. Richard Durbin. Herlihy's paper, whichshows "author approved editing" as November 23, 2005, is titled, "Amending the NaturalBorn Citizenship Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle." You can readthe paper here."There are many references to Ms. Herlihy's paper on lots of web sites, but the paper she wroteis gone. Why take it down?Please see this informationhttp://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/legislate_obama.pdf on how certainU.S. Senators tried to litigate Obama/Soeotoro's citizenship by slipping Juan McCain in as adistraction. McCain is a U.S. citizen, but not a natural born citizen and therefore is foreverand always, constitutionally ineligible; see herehttp://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/mccain_cd.pdf and here.http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/why-for-mccain-but-not-for-obama.html Another superbly written piecehttp://puzo1.blogspot.com/that should be read is by Mario Apuzzo, the lead counsel in the Kerchner v Obama case; in part:"Judge Land found that because Obama overcame a “grueling” primary campaign and a“formidable opponent” [McCain] in the general election, “ample opportunity existed fordiscovery of evidence that would support any contention that the President was not eligiblefor the office he sought.” But what Judge Land described is a political process that works well when a candidate does not hide virtually all his important papers (including his real birthcertificate). Indeed, we must also remember that there is also a legal process to any election which must be respected for that election to have any legitimacy in a Constitutional Republic.Given our standard of what the rule of law means, are we to simply accept an internet imageof a document that, given the existing contradictory evidence, does not in itself conclusively prove that Obama was born in Hawaii and which in no way erases the many doubts that stillexist regarding the place of Obama’s birth?"