You are on page 1of 84

Creating A Better Tomorrow Today!

Who Is American Industrial Consultants


We are Modeled from DODs Industrial Modernization Incentive

Program (IMIP, Mantech)

We are a consortium:
Taking R & D out of the Labs and into Production for the Good & Right of Man Kind and Product Improvement

The Goal

YES, A World without oil dependency

Inhabited until 2024 then 4 year end of Life Replace with New very Useful Space Solar Power Systems

Presentation Dates

So. California (Feb 24-28):


Still need to add: JPL, SpaceX

Mon 2/24
Zodiac Aero

Tue 2/25
Aero/Def

Wed 2/26
Northrop UAV *San Diego

Thu 2/27
Boeing Seal Bch

Fri 2/28
Boeing LB

Eaton/Parker

Aero/Def

San Diego Gen Atomics??

Boeing HB

???

Space Solar Power System

Distributed Aperture Power Collection System


Small, local power reception stations

Adaptive Beam Forming

Distributed aperture phased array in GEO

(Multiple, narrow beams transmit nearly all power collected)

Dr. D. C. Hyland Professor Texas A&M University 3141 TAMU 719B, H.R. Bright College Station Texas. 77843 Mobile: 979 255-7769 Email: dhiland@tamu.edu

Multiple smaller satellites, not a few gigantic spacecraft. Improved robustness.

Much smaller rectennas, serving local areas. Reduced ground-based power transport, reduced ground footprint
Reduced initial investment to obtain an operational system.

Space Solar Energy Systems


Solar Energy Satellite(s)
Solar Satellite

Beam Transmit Science Ground Collector System

Weather Control

Beam Full Transmit System Integration


Ground Collector

Turnkey Integration

Database & Software

Database & Software Development


Full Turnkey System Integration Weather Control System

6/10/2013

Shawn Paul Boike Proprietary

American Industrial Co. Proprietary

R & D Studies Required

Each System Requires many Detailed Studies


1.
2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Solar Energy Satellite(s) Beam Transmit Science


Ground Collector System Database & Software Development Full Turnkey System Integration Weather Control System

Best Solar Satellites

Modular, Expandable, Controllable, etc. Laser vs. EB vs. EM microwave

Optimal Beam/Energy Transmission

Selectable Ground Base Collection & Energy Storage System Performance Database & Software A Full Development & Integration Plan The Satellites to be planned & retrofitted with Beam Control; Earths Weather Control System

Solar/Energy Absorption
Solar Energy Satellite(s)
Studies:
1.

2.
3. 4.

Best Solar Absorption/Conversion Modular, Expandable, Controllable & Shape Changing/Morphing


1. SolutionCell Design optimization

Best PhotoVoltaic Conversion


Alta Devices reports NREL verification of 23.5% efficiency for counterintuitive solar panel http://www.nrel.gov/pv/ Boeings Spectralabs: my Friend Nuran D. was @ Spectra (GaAs)

Energy Beam Transmission


Optimal Beam/Energy Transmission Detailed Studies: 1. Optimal Beam/Energy Transmission
1.

2. 3.

Laser (http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2010/p h240/ma1/) Electron Beam EM (microwave)

Beam Transmit Science

2. Expandable 3. Controllable

Ground Collection System

Ground Collector System

Studies:
1. 2. 3.

4. 5.

Sizing per consumed kWh/population Storage Systems Types (Existing, piggyback or new) Modular & Expandable increased consumption & Population Spread & Placement Safety Improvements & Improved techniques over existing grid. 1. Less Susceptible to Nuclear or EMP
(Hardening Requires a 60 DB shrouding/insulation)

Software & Dbase Required


Database & Software Development

Requirements:
Orbital conditions for direct Delivery & Timing

How Many Satellites Required

Earth Conditions Locations for Allies being fed

Weather Condition & Effects


Schedule Deliveries & Grids

Every Sub System to be developed

Turnkey Integration Required


Full Turnkey System Integration

Requirements:
Space Delivery vs. Requirements

Design & Build How Many Satellites Required


Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop, Honeywell, Raytheon, BAE, B/E, etc

Suppliers to Design & Build

Schedule Deliveries & Grids Every Sub System to be developed

Turnkey Integration Required


Weather Control System

Requirements:
Mirror Morphing System Requirements

How Many Satellites Required Optimal Orbital Positions Design Options & Build Schedules Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop, Honeywell, Raytheon, BAE, B/E, etc

Suppliers to Design & Build

Schedule Deliveries & Grids Every Sub System to be developed

Next Steps

Initial Trade Study & Cost Variations: Which Orbit Trade-Off:


LEO GEO

Beam Transmission Trade-Off:


Microwave: Transparency of Atmosphere
Laser Beam Transmission Study

Find a Better way to Web Conference Trello vs. Gmail vs. gotomeeting, etc

Development Cycle Diagram


DRAFT-REF Each Phase Required to Get There:
SSP Installs Stage5 Systems & Database Stage1R&D

SSP Des/Eng Stage2

Space Solar Power Evolution

SSP Test/Eval Stage4

SSP Mfg/QA Stage3

American Industrial Co. Proprietary

Energy Costs Europe:

http://timothyhughes.sharedby.co/share/Ekz8Z3

Funding

Funding: NSF: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN2o_0m1Jk8&feature=colike


http://www.ev-info.com/en/electric-boats-manufacturers.html

http://blog.cleantech.com/tag/nrel/

Recently SunPower announced it broke the record for solar cell efficiency for a large area silicon wafers. NREL certified the SunPower cell at 24.2%. I anxiously pulled up one of my favorite solargeek charts, NRELs Best Research -Cell Efficiencies to plot SunPowers accomplishment. The key term in the title of this chart is Research -Cell. By definition a research cell is typically a one off and small (on the order of 1cm2). Researchers at University of South Wales still hold the record for single crystal silicon cells (aka monocrystalline) at 24.7%. SunPowers announced a full-scale solar cell that is a certified record holder for large area silicon wafers. SunPower, you overcame one challenge, making a large cell. This is impressive. I look forward to removing almost from my po st when you announce a new product line manufactured at scale with a 24+% efficiency OR you announce a research 24.8+% research cell.

http://en.openei.org/apps/TCDB/

SPS-ALPHA: The First Practical Solar Power Satellite via Arbitrarily Large PHased Array http://www.nasa.gov/offices/oct/stp/niac/mankins_sps_alpha.html#

Gold Backed China's Yuan Set To Become Global Reserve Currency?

American Industrial Co.

The Co2 BS

B.S.

DoD Weighs Major COCOM Realignment

Propulsion lasers after 5 hrs

970 s, 11 deg sweep over 7743 km. 3286 m/s velocity gain
GEO

320km perigee

236 s, 1630 m/s ~20 km

Hohmann transfer orbit 5 hr

Looking down over the North Pole, Earth not to scale.

Beamed Energy and $100/kg to GEO


On why cheap space transportation gives low cost energy and how power in space gives low cost transport and how to get started Keith Henson (L5 Society)

In four part harmony

Part 1 Economics and transport technical Part 2 Building a seed propulsion laser Part 3 Completing the seed laser Part 4 Business and political case

Part 1

Power sats Economic analysis to undercut coal Lift cost limit $100 for 5 kg/kW Beamed energy & analysis 10 km air drop Laser progress

OVERALL CONFIGURATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS SPS (FROM DOE STUDIES)

SPACEBORNE ARRAY

RECTENNA ON EARTH

Simple analysis

10 year return on capital, 80,000 hours $1600/kW can be paid back at 2 cents per kWh $200/kW rectenna, $900/kW parts and labor ($450 before transmission lost), $500/kW for transport to GEO At 5 kg/kW requires $100/kg or less to GEO

Cant be done with chemical fuel

Current $20,000/kg to GEO SpaceX $4,000/kg $1,000/kg 20t/1400t, 1.4% payload Skylon ~$1000/kg $500/kg 7t/300t, 2.3% payload

Combine with:

Hydrogen combustion to 25 km, & Mach 5.5 Laser heated hydrogen above that point (laser beamed down from GEO)

Two GW of laser (1.8 GW actually) Performance analysis, 54 t to LEO Vehicle 24 t, (20% structure) plus 30 t second stage to LEO 2/3rd of second stage to GEO (20 t)

105 kW CW

Cost breakdown

Vehicle amortization $10/kg Hydrogen $6/kg Laser $50 B (written off in 5 years) $10 B/0.5 B kg is $20/kg $36/kg, well under the $100/kg number

Why Airdrop at 10 km

Huge Landing gear reduction Max landing is 54 tons, 120 t less 76 tons of LH2 dumped in an abort.

Part 2, Getting started (Building a seed laser)

scale, 500 MW @ 10 kg/kW 5000 tons, Falcon Heavy @ 20 t per flight 250 flights at 0.1 B/flight, $25 B $5 B laser at $10/W 500 days at a launch every other day

Part 3, completing 2 GW

$15 B laser/power sat parts, 15,000 tons 60 scale vehicles, 5 tons to GEO 20 flights per day, 150 days, 2 years total Transport cost @ $100/kg $1.5 B Total cost $50-100 B Income @ $100/kg * 500,000 t $50 B/yr Payback from gross income ~2 years.

Falcons can't build power sats but they can build a very expensive laser?

2 GW electric power at 2 cent per kWh is worth $320 M/yr 2 GW of laser propulsion is worth $50 B/yr >100 times as much

Part 4 This makes a business case

It closes the business case for making 2 cent per kWh power and we know there is plenty of market at that price (TWs) It solves energy, energy security and carbon problems (carbon neutral synthetic fuel for a dollar a gallon) Even at two cents per kWh it makes huge profits

BUTIt is too big to do without major government backing

And oil, coal and gas industries will lobby against a real solution. So why should the government consider it?

It costs perhaps 10% of what a war with Iran would cost


SDI with the USSR or Russia was/is a losing business. It will be decades before Iran could overwhelm a multi GW propulsion laser and by that time the commercial demand for laser propulsion should be in the tens of GW Cheap power from space removes any legitimate reason to sort out uranium atoms

Google henson oil drum for a for a slightly out of datewhite paper on this topic

Part 1 months ago Part 2 and 3 a few weeks ago Part 4 last week This is unlikely to be the final evolution of the idea.

Stuff to do

Write arguments that oil, coal and gas industries will not be hurt Synthetic oil for the oil companies and they can sell gasoline for the next century Using coal for a while making synthetic oil Making hydrogen out of an awful lot of gas (230 tons an hour, shipload a week)

Weather opened by heat


Global Crop Production Increases Threefold Over The Past 50 Years http://bit.ly/14mN5MZ

You might also like