Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Spinoza Contra Kant and the Cause of Esprital Truth

Spinoza Contra Kant and the Cause of Esprital Truth

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1 |Likes:
Published by Mabdomar
Constantin Brunner
Constantin Brunner

More info:

Categories:Types, Brochures
Published by: Mabdomar on Jan 27, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Spinoza contra Kant and the Cause of Esprital TruthBy Constantin BrunnerOriginally published in German in 199 as an introduction to
 Spinoza und sein Kreis : historisch-kritische Studien über holländische Freigeister 
 ! Koenraad Oege "einsma#$ublished in %rench as
 Spinoza contre Kant et la cause de la vérité spirituelle.
Translated and &ith and introduction by 'enri (uri)# * $aris + ,# -rin. 19/0#This English translation is based on an unpublished ersion translated by 'enri (uri)# 2t has been edited and modified by Barrett $asha3# 04#
Are you narrow-minded, upset by a new word?Will you only hear that which you've already heard? —J.W. Goethe, Spinoist and non-!antian."ther than !ant, none amon# those innovative men whom one calls philosophers  possesses the compellin# $orce o$ Spinoa, whose ma%esty is such that it is not without a certain 'popularity.'Spinoa and !ant—Spinoa or !ant&here lies in this opposition... however, what is to come now is central to the most serious o$ matters, and is itsel$ deeply serious, and is not $or unthin(in# people, who close their ears as soon as they hear anythin# revolutionary and $ran(ly )ueer soundin# compared to that to which they are accustomed, especially when it concerns *mmanuel !ant+ since they automatically, without (nowin# how, stand on their #uard proclaimin# We, all, are !antians& So #oes the $irst verse o$ the battleson# o$ the scholars one a$ter the other they trot behind their *mmanuel !ant li(e lambs behind their mama+ a#ainst us, however, the mee(est o$ these lambs acts li(e a ti#er cub, strainin# to roar and act all  bloodthirsty.or we say Spinoa and !ant. And we say Spinoa or !ant& And we $ind it more a#reeable i$, when we say this, the !ant-people, in their $ancy, seie us, brea( us and annihilate us, than i$ they were to do the opposite, and pamper and $latter us.Spinoa and !ant—$rom one and $rom the other emanates respectively the best and the worst o$ thou#ht. *n Spinoa's system the apparently numerous ideas $ind their conclusion in the stead$ast awareness o$ the "ne, where$rom each idea emer#es renewed in brilliance
and $orce, mani$estin# its solidarity with all the others, to#ether with its own thrivin# e/istence, in the "ne—in all these ideas lives bri#ht the "ne idea, as it is said that on all the stones and pebbles o$ 0ount Sinai a burnin# bush is reproduced. With all our thin(in# we $ind ourselves enhanced throu#h Spinoa's systematic ideolo#y, which, li(e a lively $ountain, pervades heart and bein#ness, brin#in# puri$ication and edi$ication and $illin# us with the pure %oy o$ the 1ternal."n the other hand, !ant, with his metaphysics, splits the one and only reality into many more disconnected thou#hts than are to be $ound in the avera#e mind, and never #oes  beyond the crude data o$ sensory perceptions. And what could he brin# us to modi$y our stead$ast mind—he, who is so uncertain and superstitious at the bottom o$ his heart? *mmanuel !ant, the #reat scholastic—#reater than 2uns Scotus,
doctor subtilis
+ #reater than homas A)uinas,
doctor angelicus;
#reater than Albertus, surnamed the Great— *mmanuel the Greatest,
 scholasticissimus, doctor inexplicabilis
, whom no one o$ his dili#ent $ollowers has yet been able to e/plore, and to tell us i$ we should consider him as a s(eptic, or as one who shares the superstition o$ the masses.3ut there $inally came a merry $ellow, my alter-e#o, who $ound out and $aith$ully reported 4in a wor( which will be o$ten )uoted below5 that he, doctor
 sibi repugnans
,  belon#s to both, to the s(eptic and to the superstitious. As $ar as his superstition is concerned, it stands midway between the dyin# reli#ion—to which his heart seems mainly dedicated—and the post-reli#ious new superstition o$ evolutionism, that youn# successor, #rown stron# in our midst and about ready to ta(e over the leadership, without waitin# until the old be dead and #one.*n !ant we have the condensed, palpable moultin# o$ the dominant popular mentality, ie. o$ superstition+ $or, once more in human history, superstition is under#oin# a trans$ormation this time, $rom reli#ion to that hundred times, thousand times #reater $olly o$ evolutionism. "$ course, people are completely unaware o$ the $act that evolution re)uires %ust as much $aith and credulity on their part as $ormerly did reli#ion, and that they have simply $ound therein some new superstitions. hose who $ind themselves liberated $rom the old superstitions believe themselves now to have $reed themselves $rom all superstition, since in their i#norance o$ the true nature o$ superstition, they thin( that it may be overcome, and so #o on ar#uin# about it in purely ne#ative terms, there  bein# now nothin# le$t to believe in....Since the idea that li$e and death are one and the same 4 in 6ature everythin# bein# e)ually positive, as positive as is in #eneral our relative nature itsel$5—since they are incapable o$ #raspin# that true idea, they eventually conclude, that a$ter one passes away, there is nothin# le$t and everythin# comes to an end. 7naware o$ the $act that they $all constantly $rom one enslavin# superstition into another, they would rather ma(e us  believe that with each new one they have now $ound ruth and reedom.*n these times o$ transition between the $orms o$ superstition, many people e/perience the same $ate as my $riend the modern-minded, who durin# his whole li$e—top secret in$ormation—received and still receives whippin#s in his youth $rom his parents and
teachers, as was then $ashionable+ and today $rom his children, a$ter the now prevailin# $ashion.*n the case o$ *mmanuel !ant, what can we observe o$ the metamorphosis o$ superstition $rom reli#ion to evolutionism? What $unction, in the midst o$ these two superstitions, does s(epticism serve? And how did this supreme mi/olo#ist o$ reli#ion, evolutionism and s(epticism #row to become the $amous *mmanuel !ant, whom people $ind so  praiseworthy and whom we $ind so dread$ul? "$ all this one may $ind elsewhere the most complete and pertinent analysis. 8ere, it will su$$ice to state the $act that everybody is praisin# !ant who—bend or brea(—encompasses in his conscience and e/presses in philosophical terms everythin# which they, in a less pro$ound way, also comprehend+ and naturally, everythin# else which simpler people thin( and believe in. *sn't that a $act? Aren't most o$ the people around us little !ants, disposin# at their $in#ertips o$ reli#ion, s(epticism and o$ evolutionism+ and ma(in# out o$ these three in#redients a convenient seasonin# $or their ever-chan#in# opinions? *t is their own sa#acity which they are rediscoverin# or, at least, could very %udiciously rediscover throu#h !ant $or he is the most sa#acious+ and $or him, e$$ectively, the three have  become one. 1ven those in whom these elements are more separated can appeal to !ant, as he seems to rein$orce anyone, whatever may be his opinion a reli#ious believer, a reli#ious s(eptic, or a s(eptical evolutionist.We have %ust de$ined the three basic types o$ our present transitional period the believers in reli#ion, those who combine reli#ion with s(epticism, and those who combine s(epticism with a belie$ in evolutionism. We still disre#ard $or the moment those who already espouse $aith$ully the doctrine o$ evolutionism, althou#h they deserve most o$ our attention since their (ind will be the leaders in the days to come. or the time bein#, however, they are still a minority, and we will be concerned here only with the class o$ the most distin#uished and advanced people in our present era o$ transition. his is the cate#ory o$ those who combine s(epticism with a belie$ in evolution. *ndeed, be$ore the new belie$ ac)uires its hermetical orthodo/y and $ree thin(in# drops a#ain below ero, as it had in the past hermetic era o$ reli#ion, up to that time—despite the already decided victory o$ the new superstition—s(epticism will remain on its side. 9eople still have their s(eptical attitude, which had helped to $i#ht a#ainst the previously dominant superstition o$ reli#ion, the $ire o$ which is e/tin#uished, but the hearth is still warm. *t is clear that it cannot happen without the middlin# o$ s(epticism $rom one summit o$ superstition to the ne/t, one passes necessarily over the abyss o$ s(epticism.We stand now—it is $air to %ud#e an era a$ter its most advanced spirits, who represent it  best and re$lect its true character—we stand presently, * say, under the con%unction o$ s(epticism and evolutionism, o$ that wretched evolutionism and that %ust as wretched s(eptical attitude. :ou must (now s(epticism is an e/cellent servant and helper a#ainst superstition, but it should not become your master in lieu o$ ruth+ by itsel$, indeed, s(epticism is as wretched as superstition, $or both are e)ually oblivious o$ ruth. 6o doubt about, s(epticism has done a #ood %ob a#ainst reli#ious superstition, and could help us a#ainst the new superstition& 3ut the deep con$usion o$ our times lies precisely in the

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->