3
by Hapsburg tyranny, feudal conditions and semi-colonial subservience to the Austrianempire. In this manner, Jókai and Mikszáth established a lyrical approach to the recent past.They saw heroes and eccentrics in the Hungary of yore, and both types equally require thedescriptive art of romanticism and of realism to portray them. With Jókai and Mikszáth theHungarian towns and country manors became populated with strange and unique charactersand personalities. The art of these writers harbours a peculiar confession - that the second half of the century looked with emotion and pain upon the hopes and aims that had preceded
1
848.The defeat of the revolution and of the struggle for freedom had thwarted the fulfilment of these aims and the hopes remained unrequited. Jókai and Mikszáth voiced the feelings of the‘‘better half” of the nation - capitalist Hungary looked back on the Hungary of the pre-
1
848 period, as upon its own better part. Or, as a mature and disillusioned man, upon the happy,magnanimous, youthful period of great expectations, bold ventures and selfless heroism.It was Jókai and Mikszáth who gave birth to modern Hungarian short-story writing. Theseshort stories were a development of the anecdote, itself the favoured literary form of the old, patriarchal Hungary. These full-flavoured anecdotal short stories, built up round a point, are inmany ways different from Maupassant’s type of short story. The characters of these shortstories are heroes or eccentrics. The anecdote is suitable for the portrayal of both types. Itskindly, humorous savour deprives heroism of its poignancy, and eccentricity of the painfulfeeling of backwardness. The faithful heir, tender and cultivator of the anecdotal art of Jókaiand Mikszáth was Károly Eötvös.End-of-the-century Hungary awoke from its romanticism. In our country this romanticism hada longer after-life than anywhere else in the world. The cult of the recent past entertained bythe period of capitalism, could only be maintained amid the forms of romanticism. But theyoung generation of writers at the end of the century had no reminiscences of this pre-
1
848fairyland. Their experiences were simpler and more bitter. A truly urban Hungary had comeinto being, which saw even the village differently than the patriarchal mid-century generation.This period turned its attention to the unsolved, unsettled social problems of its day - and the breath of a new revolution may be felt in the passion with which the young generation drewattention to the destitution of the peasantry, the defencelessness of simple people and thedepravity of the gentry. One of the leading figures of this new literature - a special kind of
littérature engagée
that was permeated with a sense of responsibility - was Sándor Bródy.And in his immediate vicinity, István Tömörkény provides an example of the philanthropic,sympathetic view of the people entertained by the urban intelligentsia. Tömörkény made averitable
discovery
of the peasant world which the heirs of romanticism had so far only presented on the scenes of bucolic plays and sentimental short stories, in an idealized, syrupysetting. His short stories are sometimes rendered cumbersome by their ethnographicdescriptions - inventories of customs, implements and the peculiarities of various trades.Zsigmond Móricz, with his rich knowledge of the peasantry, thought Tömörkény’s shortstories were “ethnographic museums.” Yet there was need for this “inventory” to be made, because the world which Tömörkény described was as unknown to the educated classes as thelife of an African tribe. More or less contemporaneously with the poor of the farmsteads onthe
pusztas
, this period also discovered the urban poor, the proletarians. Ferenc Molnár wasthe first, before he undertook his more celebrated but also more superficial ventures instagecraft, to take note of the urban poor and to discover the bitter-sweet poetry of their life.The generation of short-story writers who emerged at the turn of the century, played only theoverture to the great poetic revolution that developed in this country between
1
905 and
1
9
1
9.This was intrinsically a revolutionary period, throughout Europe. The unallayed, defeatedHungarian revolution of
1
848-
1
849 came to life again in the bourgeois revolution of
1
9
1
8 and