·U. Dan of Jusic
Imiaion Review Decisio of the Board of Imitio Appeas Fal Church, Virgiia
Fe: A095 640 803 -Ls Ageles, CA
re OMAR DANIEL RUIZ IN EMOVAL POCEEDINGS APPEAL Date ON BEHALF OF SPNDENT Audr R Behe, Esqure ODER
The respondent, a native and cze of exico, appeals om the Immgrao Judge's decsion dated Seteber 9, 2013, whch deed hs request contuce, dened volnty depre under secton 240B of he Immaon and Naonaly Act, 8 U.S.C.
1229c, d odered him emoved om the Ued Saes.
e Depmet o omeland Securty (DHS) has not replied to he respodes bre on appeal. The record ll be remded. We revew Immgration Judges ndngs of ct r cle eor, but we eview uestos o law, dscreon, d judent, and al oher ssues in appeals de novo. 8 C.F.R.
10.(d)(3)(), (). e ecod shows a he DHS chaged e resonde as emovabe der sectio 27(a)()(D)(i) of he Ac, 8 U.S.C.
1227(a)()(D)(i) (condiioa residet sas ternated) (Eh. 2). The respondent rovded to e Iigraon Co a copy of the Fo 75, Peiion o Remove Codios on Residence, he led wh the Unted Staes Ctizenshp d mmigration Serces (USCIS) on Agt 22, 201 (Eh. 4). We agree wih the cotenon on appeal tha, prsat o Bod precede, the Immgraon Jdge shoul have contnued proceengs.
Se Matter of Stowers,
22 I&N Dec. 605 (BIA 1999) (where aen s prma ce eigbe r a wver under secion 26(c)(4) o he Ac and wshes o have he USCS aucate application r such waver, proceedngs should be cotnued
order to allow e USCIS to adudcae the applicato).
See also aer of
Dec. 84, 87 BIA 205). Accordngly, he appeal s ssaed, and he recod s remded o e Imgrato Jdge r her proceedigs consste wi he regong opon d r he eny o a ew decson.
The respodent does o chlege e denal of voluny depare.
Cite as: Omar Daniel Ruiz, A095 640 803 (BIA Jan. 23, 2014)