2004 Liepos 22d. (ketvirtadienis).
(30/10. bkoz its th last of my rtkls ← lithol&, kompletn O, Im ^ th1
st
of th ssays I wrote whn I bgan h&n out my work. It woz th strt of a journey → bskure, nsgnpostdpath whch iz nly slghtly mor dscernbl in rtrospkt. I woz well long th way b4 I knew I woz on it & now Isuspkt it may b kumn 2 an nd. Im due 4 a change of stroke. Prhps I should b prayn (makin myslf sm-all) not writin (whch iz xbitionst). I note th@ I pasted it → my journal on 18/4/99. It iz titld
ART
(a 3 – let-ter word) :
“
The world’s a stage & every man a player – Bill Shakespyras. If actors areartists then we are all artists. Some more so than others; & there are various kinds.
(paragraph)
On the countless number of continuums that we could use as metaphors to talk about art I like the one where we spread artists along the line : decorative ……………….challenging.
(paragraph)
The decorator draws an intricate edging along the borders of alove letter bringing some extra beauty into the world of the receiver. Another decorator hangs lovely rural scenes on the walls to make the kitchen homely. An art collector putsan expensive wooden sculpture (Shona?) in the foyer of his mansion & for good measurea granite form (Henry Moore?) in his garden under the florida palms next to where the patio & entertainment area overlook the swimming pool.
(paragraph)
If I had been an artist I would have wanted to be at the other end of the line. The one where you challengeaccepted & habitual ways of looking at the world. I would like to take people on a journey through difficult terrain into unchartered waters. Great artists have done that.But they are very few. How do they do it? That’s the problem.
(p-aragraph)
An individualobserves the world through the window of his identity consisting of many components all joined together in a single whole as if they were pieces of coloured glass held together by lead sealing. Some major components are religion, tribal affiliation, so-cial status,sexual role, etc. etc. We invest a lot of ourselves in building the structure and thenmaintaining its cohesion. Serious damage to any one of the lattices can make the wholewindow fall to pieces. Rearranging the coloured shards is almost impossible and doneonly at large cost. Once we’ve joined the pieces together it is tempting to keep themfirmly in place ever after; from inertia alone. For the more tim-id the slightest challengeto its rigidity is taken as life threatening. The fundamentalist mind set is like that. Notethe reaction to Andre Serrano’s ‘sss-x-riced’. Or threaten the tribla identification of a people & they might ethnically cleanse you.
(paragraph)
So it would seem impossible tochange how a person views the world. On this model at least. Yet great artists dosometimes help us, perhaps by their combined efforts, to go on extraordinary journeys.
(paragraph)
If I were an artist I would like to be the person who loosens, a little, the leadseals that hold the shards together. That would be sufficient challenge for me. I like tothink that though most are born to build there is also a need for the occasional personwhose task it is to loosen structures, even shake them apart at times, or threaten to. Put in anoth-er way, I would rather rock the boat than row it. To do it well, which may simply mean to get away with it, may require a bit of style, a bit of art perhaps. A bit of wickedhumour, a bit of trickery, a bit of shock? (
(paragraph)
***********
(paragraph)
It should benoted that though in western culture notions about GOD & ART share a parallel history (prior to the post-modern era at least) they share other things too. Both are 3-letter words. Further, as students of arcane coincidences and devotees of trivial pursuit will beaware, both are imperfect reflections of the animal kingdom as GOD is an anagram of dog and ART is an anagram of rat.”
) 5.40pm. Im writin in room 203 (c ‘Vilnius (no 1)’ & ‘(no 2)’) inno 2 Latako g. (31/10. c left h& side (btween 11 & 1-4) of kuvr map of ‘Vilnius (no 1)’. Lso note th@foto on kuvr of ‘Vilnius (no 2)’ is takn from 16 (ie Rotu-šė, Menininku rūmai)) Vilnius. Im testn out‘Čepkeliu trauktine su Bruknėmis’ & I rekn its not az good az th uthr (c ‘→ (no 2)’ p16) bkoz its sweetr.Iv just kum back from a kavine in Gaono g. (@ 1 nd of it thr iz a PAMINKLAS (lithol& iz th l& of PAMINKLAI (…AI is th plurl)) whch reads : VILNIAUS GAONUI ELIJAHU hoo th waitrss sez (ftr nquiries & fone kalls in th kitchn) woz an mportnt Torah skolr (rabin-as) in th 1700s. Sh sez I kan findout mor O him @ th jwsh mzeum (hvnt cn th 1 in Melb.) & I mght br-eak my rule & do just th@
1
Add a Comment