CHURCH HISTORYabout World War
I
and one about Catholic peacemaking, but otherwise
warand peace
was a neglected category in the decade following the VietnameseWar and during the ending ofthe Cold War. We have heard much about thetherapeutic revolution and obsession in the religious world; where are thehistories of
therapy
in America?More surprises: for all the talk about
New Religious Movements
or "cults" asthey are usually pejoratively called, movements that attracted so muchattention in the late 1960s and through the 1970s, historians largely left thestudy of these to sociologists. Similarly,
spirituality
came to be a topic ofintense pursuit as well as fashion and fancy in the culture at large, andcertainly has been a longtime preoccupation of historians, but it receivedlittle attention from Americanists. These are times of favor shown to "bornagain" Christianity and exuberant religion, yet there was little new work onthe history of
conversion, revivals, and awakenings
in America. The observanceof the U. S. Constitutional bicentennial and that of the Bill of Rights may haveoccasioned some writings on the
Constitutional
story, but not as much as somewould have expected, and
civil religion,
a preoccupation a decade earlier, wasalso relatively slighted in the 1980s. For that matter, while there was aconsiderable increase in the notice given women in American religion andwhile they received more attention than before in books whose titles do notsuggest a preoccupation with feminist themes, the
women-in-religion
story isjust beginning to be told. Despite the talk about multiculturalism, somecultures-Asian-and
Hispanic-American-went
almost uncovered by histori-ans. And through the years of the Reagan-Bush administrations, duringtimes of intense preoccupations with free enterprise, capitalism, marketeconomies, and the like, in their relations to religion-especially in the fieldof ethics-we could only find a couple of titles on the history of
business
andreligion.The most striking feature, and the one that produces an implicit thesis forthis introduction and the whole endeavor, is this: for all the talk about the"hegemony" of
mainstream Protestant denominations
in the eyes of historians;the historians' predilection for telling the story of "the center and not theperiphery"; the accusation that they marginalize many and assign "outsider"status to those who have not been members of that (or the Catholic)mainstream, the actual literary production of historians during the decadeshowed such prejudicing to be anything but the case. There is one bigexception: New England colonial religion, especially of the Puritan brand,attracted scores of historians, as
it
has for decades. But note how fewtitles-almost none!-there are for middle and even southern colonies. Andonce one gets to the national period, the time of the flourishing of denomina-tions, down through the present, one would have a hard time locating"mainline" or "establishment" Protestantism by tracking the historians. ThusMethodists, who down to the present make up Protestantism's second largest
Leave a Comment