• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Client and Audience Cults in America
William Sims Bainbridge; Rodney Stark 
Sociological Analysis
, Vol. 41, No. 3. (Autumn, 1980), pp. 199-214.
Sociological Analysis
is currently published by Association for the Sociology of Religion, Inc..Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtainedprior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content inthe JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained athttp://www.jstor.org/journals/asr.html.Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printedpage of such transmission.The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers,and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community takeadvantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.http://www.jstor.orgWed Jul 4 21:10:00 2007
 
Client and AudienceCults in America
William Sims BainbridgeRodney
Stark
Unizersit! of Washington
Several sources of good infomation about client cults and audience cults are analyzed geograph~c-ally. Data are taken from six directories,
Fate
maga~ine, ranscendental Meditation initiation rec-ords, classified telephone directories, and the Gallup Poll. The geographic distribution found in anearlier study of cult movements is replicated: the Pacific and Mountain regions have ue.r, high rates,ulhile the East South Central region is ueq low. Rates for client cults shou' distributions reflectingthat of cult movements, while audience cults show a much flatter distribution. The distributions re-sult both from differential receptivity to religious deviance and variation in degree of deviance amongthe measures. Departures from the main trends are analyzed, and prospects for future quantitative re-search are judged to be quite good. An empirical outgrowth of the attempt to develop a general theoyof religion, the research reported here supports key concepts and certain propositions derived from thetheory.
This paper examines the prevalence and location of several kinds of cults and cult in-terests. In doing so we also explore empirically the adequacy of our conceptual distinc-tions among three levels of cults: cult movements, client cults, and audience cults. Fur-thermore, comparisons of a number of independent measures of cult activity allow anassessment of the adequacy of these measures for other research uses. Are the resultsconsistent? Are variations from one measure to another theoretically intelligible?In previous work we developed the concept of cult to identify novel, deviant faiths(Stark and Bainbridge, 1979). But, we pointed out, many cults do not constitute fully de-veloped
religions.
Many cults do not offer a sufficiently complete theology to qualify asreligions, but instead are limited to providing magical services or to propagating mythand amusement.Cults limited to providing magical services are
client cults.
As Durkheim recognizedlong ago, there is "no Church of magic" (1915:44). The relationship between magicianand customer is limited to the consultant/client or therapidpatient model, short-termexchanges with relatively specific aims.
Audience cults
are even less close to being religions. Usually they display little or no for-mal organization of any kind. Indeed, the great majority of persons who take part in au-dience cults do so entirely through the mass media: books, magazines, newspapers, TV,astrology columns, and the like. Somewhat greater, but still minimal, organization existsamong those who attend occult lectures, frequent occult bookstores, or take part ininformal discussion groups on occult topics.
Acknowledgement: Our thanks go to Daniel
H.
Jackson for the
TM
data, to Curtis
G.
Fuller for the
Fate
subscription statistics,
and
to Charlie Millington for great help in collecting the data on astrologers.
 
200
SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Only
cult movements
are fully-fledged religions. They can be distinguished fromchurches on the basis of their relatively high tension with their surrounding socio-cultural environment. They can be distinguished from sects in that they constitute or re-main within a
deviant
religious tradition, while sects are schismatic movements within aconventional religious tradition.Cult movements command our interest because they represent
nett
religions. Thus, ifLve would know how religious innovation occurs and the conditions governing whethernew religions prosper or fail, are must examine cult movements.Client cults command our interest because they often
et~ole'ento
cult movements. Re-cent examples of magical therapy cults that evolved into fully-developed religions areScientology (Wallis, 1976) and The Process (Bainbridge, 1978).However, the role of audience cults in generating religious innovation or in ~rovidinga potential pool of recruits for nea7cult movements is still somewhat unclear (Stark andBainbridge, 1980). Obviously, most who are part of the mass audience for occultism nev-er join cult movements. Indeed, some combine their interests in the occult with a firmcommitment to a wholly conventional religious body. Yet, many who do join cults seemto have had prior exposure to audience cults (Balch and Taylor, 1977; Lynch, 1977,1919).We have proposed that cults varv in how general or valuable are the compensatorsthey offer, and the degree of follov,lers' involvement varies in parallel fashion. As cultsrange from fully developed religions do~vno mere promulgators of vague mythology, in-volvement varies from fulltime participation in a cult movement down to mild interestin occult ideas as
a
source of diversion and entertainment.
If
this is so, then Lve can ex-pect to observe several things:
1)
The proportion of the population involved in cults ought to increase as we movefrom the most intense levels of involvement down to the more transient and ephemeral.
2)
Public hostilitv towards cults ought to decline in similar fashion from the more tothe less intense levels
of
involvement. Thus, for example, people ought to be quitestrongly sanctioned for becoming full-time members of a cult movement. But theyshould only be sanctioned very weakly for believing in astrology.
3)
Regional concentration of cult involvement ought to decline as we shift from exam-ining participation in cult movements to esamining interest in audience cults.Elsewhere we explain at length why cults ought to flourish in some places and timesrather than in others (Stark and Bainbridge, forthcoming). We argue that cults thrive~vhere onventional faiths are weak, but where many people still believe in the supernat-ural and desire effective answers to questions of ultimate meaning. Hence, cults willflourish in such places as the Pacific region of the United Starestoday: there the ax7erageperson is
unchurched,
but retains belief in the supernatural.In a previous paper we examined the temporal and spatial distribution of cult move-ments in the United States (Stark, Bainbridge, and Doyle, 1979). We found that the so-cial climate seems everywhere in the nation to have become more tolerant of cults. Yet,we also found dramatic regional differences of the kind anticipated. Cult movements
are
greatly concentrated along the shores of the Pacific, precisely where church membershiprates are much the loa,est in the nation. Ho\vever,
to the extent that
n~lts
re not recognized
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...