409
ELIGION AND BEREAVEMENT: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
those most likely
to
be confronted with bereavement (Wuthnow, 1976b; Roof, 1978b).Indeed, religion in one form or another appears to be a dimension of life that is virtuallyuniversal in this age group.Second, research has demonstrated that religious organizations function, alongwith family and community, as significant social support systems for many of theirmembers. Religious organizations perform this function by providing friendship ties(Lenski, 1961), by reinforcing localistic loyalties (Roof, 1978a), and by serving as"family surrogates" (Glock,
et
d,
1967).
Third,
religion has been conceptualized
in
the theoretical literature as a source ofsubjective meaning, a framework that helps
to
make reality understandable (Bellah,1970; Geertz, 1973; Greeley, 1972). Empirical evidence has shown positiverelationships between religiosity and feelings of purpose in life and well-being (Gurin,
et
aL,
1960: 245; Hadaway
&
Roof, 1978).Finally, research has generally (although not consistently) shown religiouscommitment to be higher among persons in crisis situations and among personsconfronted with subjective stress or anxiety (reviewed in Argyle
&
Beit-Hallahmi,1975: 52-57).In addition to whatever impressionistic notions may be held, these pieces ofevidence indicate that religion is likely
to
have a bearing on coping with bereavement.But they suggest only the likelihood of a relationship, not the nature of content of thatrelationship. It cannot be presumed that the relationship necessarily is positive. Nor isit at all clear how different beliefs, experiences, and practices may be associated withbereavement. We are, therefore, in the curious situation of having strong reason tosuspect that religion is an important factor to understand if ways of facilitatingadjustment among the bereaved are
to
be found, but research thus far has failed toreveal the main dimensions of this factor.The available empirical and theoretical literature does, however, afford some cluesabout the kinds of religious factors that warrant attention. As the foregoing suggests,some of the likely effects of religion on bereavement derive from the fact that religiousorientations seem
to
provide meaning, while others stem from the support or sense ofbelonging that religion may provide. The distinction between meaning and belongingis, in fact, one that has been employed usefully in other studies of religion (e.g., Greeley,1972; Roof, 1978a).
RELIGION AS
A
SOURCE OF MEANING
In the comparative study of modem religion, problems of bereavement, illness, andexistential anxiety
-
in short, "problems of suffering"
-
have occupied a centralposition at least as far as theoretical discussion has been concerned. These problems
are
said
to
raise "religious questions" in that they confront the believer with questionsabout the meaningfulness of his or her existence. Clifford Geertz (1973: 104) writes inhis celebrated essay on the definition of religion: "As a religious problem, the problemof suffering is, paradoxically, not how
to
avoid suffering but how to suffer, how to makeof physical pain, personal loss, worldly defect, or the helpless contemplation of others'agony something bearable, supportable
-
something, as we say, sufferable." Religions
Leave a Comment