Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
1-26-14 Ltr Regrding Rep. Keith Perry's Legislative Term Limits Bill Et Al (Autosaved)

1-26-14 Ltr Regrding Rep. Keith Perry's Legislative Term Limits Bill Et Al (Autosaved)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 15|Likes:
Published by Roy Callahan
Letter regarding Florida legislative term limits bill; destroying the Florida Constitution; turning government upside down; power grab, Marxist-humanist - secular politicians
Letter regarding Florida legislative term limits bill; destroying the Florida Constitution; turning government upside down; power grab, Marxist-humanist - secular politicians

More info:

Categories:Types, Presentations
Published by: Roy Callahan on Feb 03, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





 CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Roy G. Callahan, USN, Ret.
1529 NW 143
 Street Gainesville, Florida 32606 Tel: (352) 332-9144 Fax: (352) 332-9144 call6603@bellsouth.net
Sunday, February 02, 2014 If Americans in general and Floridians in particular are wondering why their personal freedom is supplanted by laws and regulations limiting their liberty all they need to do is look at the bills their state representatives author and co-sponsor In preparation for the 2014 legislative session, Representative Keith Perry  authored three bills and co-sponsored five bills that follow. Examination reveals most set up a system or bureaucracy that grows government and micromanages the lives of Floridians. Most support and enhance the  Administrative State that is destructive to American freedom.
HB 225 Child Safety Devices in Motor Vehicles requires parents
If the child is 7 5 years of age or younger and less than .4 feet 9 inches in height, provide for protection of the child 19 by properly using a crash-tested,
federally approved
child 20 restraint device.
For children aged through 3 years, such restraint device must be a separate carrier or a  vehicle manufacturer's integrated child seat
For children aged 4 through 7 5 years and less than 4 feet 9 inches in height, a separate carrier or, an integrated child seat must, or a seat belt may be used
 Any person who violates this section commits a moving violation, punishable as provided in chapter and shall have 3 points assessed against his or her driver license as set forth in s. 322.27.
 In lieu of the penalty specified in s. 318.18 and the assessment of points, a person who violates this section may elect, with the court's approval, to participate in a child restraint safety pro-gram approved by the chief judge of the circuit in which the violation occurs, and, upon com-pleting such program, the penalty specified in chapter 318 and associated costs may be waived at the court's discretion and the assessment of points shall be waived. The child restraint safety program must use a course approved by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, and the fee for the course must bear a reasonable relationship to the cost of providing the course.
Representative Perry and his cohorts use the mantra ―it’s for the children.‖ The problem is it’s
not their children
 they are talking about; they are talking about
your children.
They arrogantly believe they have a solution and a right to micromanage your life using the force of law to do it. In this instance, the first seat belt law was a federal law which took effect on Jan-uary 1, 1968. It required all vehicles (except buses) to be fitted with seat belts in all designated seating positions. State legislators willingly take federal money that comes with laws like this
 CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
making themselves complicit to tyranny and ultimately irrelevant. They work for the federal government, their own aggrandizement; not you who casts the vote. HB 395 Growth Management
 This bill attempts to mitigate the effects of Agenda 21, a United Nations Program that that violates Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution HB 395includes
Regional Planning Councils (Regional Planning Councils bear a likeness, purpose, intent and replicate the Soviets in the Soviet Union)
 Adds a new subsection that does not eliminate vestiges of Agenda 21. 163.3167 Scope of act.
 9. Each local government shall address in its comprehensive plan, as enumerated in this chapter: (a) The water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve 19 the existing and projected  water use demand for the established 20 planning period, considering the applicable plan devel-oped 21 pursuant to s. 373.709. 22 (b) The protection of private property rights. Section 2. Paragraph (i) is added to subsection (6) of section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, to read: 163.3177 Required and optional elements of comprehensive plan; studies and surveys.
 (6) In addition to the requirements of subsections (1)- (5), the comprehensive plan shall include the following elements: (i)1. A property rights element that protects private property rights, in recognition of the legitimate and often competing public and private interests in land use regulations and other government action. The property rights element shall set forth the principles, guidelines, stand-ards, and strategies to guide the local government's decisions and program implementation with respect to the following objectives: a. Consideration of the impact to private property rights of all proposed development or-ders, plan amendments, ordinances, and other government decisions.  b. Encouragement of economic development. c. Use of alternative, innovative solutions to provide equal or better protection than the comprehensive plan. d. Consideration of the degree of harm created by noncompliance with the comprehen-sive plan's provisions. 2. Each county and each municipality within the county shall, within 1 year after adopt-ing its property rights element, adopt land development regulations consistent with this para-graph. This bill is a dichotomy. Representative Perry knows what Agenda 21 is. I furnished him all the information he needs, including a copy of the Alabama Law rewritten for Florida that forces Florida to obey
 Article 1, Section 10, U.S. Constitution
 as it pertains to individual states and their dealing and interactions with foreign powers.
 Agenda 21 and ICLEI are both United Nations programs designed to corrupt and destroy the American concept of property rights.
 CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation;
 grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment
 CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions.
Representative Perry’s
attempt to mitigate the effects of Agenda 21 does nothing to eliminate  Agenda 21 or ICLEI from
Florida’s landscape.
The attached PDF regarding this issue speaks for itself. Mr. Perry asked me to call him regarding this Article 1, Section 10 violation. I made the call and the following appointment. Representative Perry decided Common Core (Communist Core), the new rage at the time was more important than discussing this issue. I stupidly let him change the subject. Ultimately, two other Birchers and I gave Mr. Perry all the information he needed on Common Core (Communist Core) and he kept telling us his wife was against it. His secretary Caroline An-derson told Walt Boyer and
me he wasn’t going to do anything on ―Education‖ let alone
common core. I called his cards by adding one sentence to a message I sent him from the John Birch So-ciety regarding Communist Core. He
anointed me with the name ―bigot‖
and other expletives  because I object to dumbing down of Florida students and the trash common core condones and teaches. It is within this contest that we now come to HJR 613
a bill he titled ―legislative term
 HJR 613Legislative Term Limits. This bill seeks to revise Article III, Section 15, and Article VI, Section 4, and Article 12 of the Florida Constitution into something Floridians would find in California, New York, and like en- virons. This bill is written by a progressive politician
living in the People’s Republic o
f Alachua County. He labels himself conservative but this bill says otherwise because it turns the Florida Constitution on its head. Representative Perry knows the founders gave the House of Representatives two year terms be-cause the house has the power of the purse and two year terms are designed to make members accountable to the people that elect them. The host of laws that limit individual freedom and property rights are written by politicians who run for reelection every two years. If Representa-tive Perry and his cohorts can do this kind of damage with 2 year terms, just think of what they can do with four years; SECTION 15. Terms and qualifications of legislators.
 (a) SENATORS. Senators shall be elected for staggered terms of six four years. The legis-lature must divide the senate districts as evenly as possible into three classes, those from odd-numbered districts in the years the numbers of which are multiples of four and those from even-numbered districts in even-numbered years the numbers of which are not multiples of four; ex-cept, at the election next following a reapportionment, some senators shall be elected for terms of two years when necessary to maintain staggered terms.
of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, ex-cept what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's [sic] inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress. No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace,
enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power,
 or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->