Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Key FEA Recs for Reauth

Key FEA Recs for Reauth

|Views: 6|Likes:
Published by Sherman

More info:

Published by: Sherman on Oct 01, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Forum on Educational Accountability 
Key Recommendations for ESEA/NCLB Reauthorization
These recommendations derive from the reports and legislative proposals of the Forum onEducational Accountability. The FEA is a working group of signers of the
 Joint OrganizationalStatement on NCLB
. The
is now endorsed by 138 national education, civil rights,religious, disability, parent, civic and labor organizations. All FEA materials are atwww.edaccountability.org.
Shift the law’s emphasis from applying sanctions for failing to raisetest scores to holding states and localities accountable for making the systemicchanges that improve student learning.
Replace rigid annually escalating sanctionsthat wait for individual Title I funded schools to fail Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)with systemic and other flexible improvements for all Title I funded schools("capacity building"), initiated from the beginning. Ensure states and localitiespublicly report what steps they have taken to implement the systemic improvements,as well as assessment results for each school on a disaggregated basis. Replacecurrent AYP requirements, which researchers agree cannot be met by 2014, withexpectations that within five years all Title I schools will attain a rate of improvementnow reached by more effective Title I schools ("a positive trend in learningoutcomes"). Eliminate the requirement that 20% of Title I funds be spent for transfersand tutoring, and remove the governance-change sanctions schedule in the currentlaw. Provide for mandatory district intervention in schools unable to implementsystemic changes. States must assume responsibility for changes in schools that afterfive years are unable to implement the systemic changes or to show a positive trend inlearning outcomes. This may include such changes as replacing principals or otherstaff.
 Assessments –
Use multiple sources of evidence – multiple assessments and multipleindicators of school progress – across core subject areas.
Support development of local and state assessments that enable assessment of higher order thinking and thatare instructionally useful. Allow growth measures that track the progress of the samestudents from year to year. Reduce the amount of mandated testing, because testingevery child every year is not necessary for accountability purposes. Support research,development and dissemination of high-quality assessments for English languagelearners and students with disabilities, including tools to be used by, and for theprofessional development of, teachers.
Capacity Building –
 Build the capacity of teachers to effectively teach a strong and rich curriculum to all students through professional development that addressesstudent learning needs identified by school staff 
. This includes: regular peercollaboration; intensive mentoring; creation of positions for mentor teachers; and

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->