Coalition against BAYER Dangers Letter to UN Global Compactwww.CBGnetwork.org June 16, 2009 / page 3
The
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), after analyzing the incident,criticized "faulty safety systems, significant shortcomings with the emergency procedures and alack of employee training". In total OSHA identified 13 serious violations of safety regulations.Even worse - according to a US Congress investigation conducted in April the region narrowlyescaped a catastrophe that could have surpassed the 1984 Bhopal disaster. Congress investigatorsfound that the explosion "came dangerously close" to compromising an MIC storage tank. Had theexploded residue treater hit the MIC tank, "the consequences could have eclipsed the 1984 disasterin India."The investigation continues: "Evidence obtained by the committee demonstrates that Bayer engagedin a campaign of secrecy by withholding critical information from local, county and stateemergency responders; by restricting the use of information provided to federal investigators; byundermining news outlets and citizen groups concerned about the dangers posed by Bayer'sactivities; and by providing inaccurate and misleading information to the public." The committeeobtained memos in which officials suggested how the plant management should deal with localcitizen groups and journalists: "Our goal with
People Concerned About MIC
should be tomarginalize them," the memo said. "Take a similar approach to
The Charleston Gazette
.”Bayer CropScience CEO William Buckner conceded under oath that his company used chemicalplant security regulations to try to hide information about the incident and avoid a public debateover the large amounts of MIC stored at the Institute plant: "There were, of course, some businessreasons that also motivated our desire for confidentiality," Buckner said. "These included a desire tolimit negative publicity generally about the company or the Institute facility, to avoid publicpressure to reduce the volume of MIC that is produced and stored at Institute by changing toalternative technologies, or even calls by some in our community to eliminate MIC productionentirely." All documents published by the Congress Committee can be found at:http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1583&catid=133&Itemid=73
These findings prove that Bayer systematically violates various principles of the GlobalCompact, such as principle 7 (Precautionary environmental protection), Principle 8 (Specificcommitment to environmental protection) and Principle 9 (Diffusion of environmentallyfriendly technologies). Bayer´s policies do not comply with the Compact’s principles onhuman rights and the environment and thereby are harmful to the credibility
of theprogramme.
We therefore urge you to exclude Bayer from the UN Global Compact.
Bayer has started dozens of partnerships and sponsorships with medical, environmental oreducational organizations - particularly in fields where the company is criticised. The involvementwith the UN and the UNEP take up a lot of space on the company`s website and in numerousadvertising brochures. Bayer’s use of the Global Compact thus is a classic case of “bluewash” –
Add a Comment