Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Rogelio Chavez-Rubio, A205 656 470 (BIA Jan. 30, 2014)

Rogelio Chavez-Rubio, A205 656 470 (BIA Jan. 30, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 300|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record upon finding the immigration judge should have considered the respondent’s request for a continuance. The Board noted that the respondent advised the court that an attorney he had hired to represent him failed to appear, and that the immigration judge did not ask whether the respondent waived his right to counsel or wished to find another attorney or learn why his attorney failed to appear. The decision was written by Member John Guendelsberger and joined by Vice Chairman Charles Adkins-Blanch and Member Elise Manuel.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record upon finding the immigration judge should have considered the respondent’s request for a continuance. The Board noted that the respondent advised the court that an attorney he had hired to represent him failed to appear, and that the immigration judge did not ask whether the respondent waived his right to counsel or wished to find another attorney or learn why his attorney failed to appear. The decision was written by Member John Guendelsberger and joined by Vice Chairman Charles Adkins-Blanch and Member Elise Manuel.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Feb 09, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/21/2014

pdf

text

original

 
EDWRD CIUENES ESQ
   
Executve Oe r Iigraon Revew
Bard  Immigratin peals Oce  the Clerk
57
Leburg Pike. Sute

Fas Chc, Vrgna

760 WST SMPE ROD SUIE 10 POMPNO EACH F 33064 HS ICE Oic of Cif Couns TC 3900 Powr Li Rod Pompo c
FL
33072 Nm: CHVEZRUBIO, ROGEIO   205-656470 D of is oic 1302014
losed s a copy of he Bod's deon d orde  he above-eeed ase. lose
P Mb
Adkins-Blach, Chares
K
Manue Ese Guenelsberger Joh
Seey,
C
w
Do Ca Chef ek
 
Docket
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Rogelio Chavez-Rubio, A205 656 470 (BIA Jan. 30, 2014)
 
CHAVEZ-RUBIO, ROGELO A20565670 B.T.C. 3900 N POWERLINE RD OMPANO BEACH FL 33073 Name: CHAVEZ-RUBIO, ROGEIO
   
Execuive Oce  Imiain eview
Bard  Imgratn ppeal Oce  the Clerk
5107 ebug ke, Sue 2000 Fl Chh, gna 20530
HSICE Oice of Chie Counsl -C 3900 ower ine oad Pmpano Beach, FL 33072 A 205656- 70 Dt of hs oce 1 30 201
ce  a cpy  e a' ec  he abveeence cae Th cpy i beg pve  yu a a curey Yu aey r epeeave ha been eve wih h ecin puua 
8
CF § 1292(a)  he aache eciin er ha yu be remve m he Ue ae  am a mgain Juge ecii reg ha yu e emve, any pe  revew  e aache eciin mu be e wi  receive y he appprae cu  appea w

ay  he ae  he eciin cre
 Mb
Aslach Chae
K
Mae se Geelege Joh
cerey
D
t
Da ar Ce Cerk
w : k
Cite as: Rogelio Chavez-Rubio, A205 656 470 (BIA Jan. 30, 2014)
 
U.S Dement of Jice
Ex�cutive Oce r Immaon Reew Decso of he Bord o mgaon Apeal Fas Cc, Vrgna
0530
le: A205 656 470 Pompo Beach FL In re: OGLIO CHAVEZRB
ROA PROCEDS APA Date ON BAL OF PODNT Edwa Cees, quire O BEA O DHS ober D'Ao Assit Cef Cose APICATION Coice; vouy depare
JAN 3
0 214
Te reponde a tive  itzen of Meo as apee om e migrtio Judges decson ate eptember 20, 213 he Immigraon Judge un te respoet reovae a ordered  reove. Te record  e remane s or revews  mgrton Juge dng o c incuding ings as o the credibiit of temon uder te cey eoneou" san.
See
8
C.F
§
103.
()(3)();
Matter
of
RS-H
23 &N Dec. 29 (BA 203)
Mae
f
SH,
23 & Dec 62 (BIA 2002).  Board revews uesons of law, creton, an jugmet  al oter es rased i an mmgrtio Judge decon
de
novo.
See
8
C.F
§
1003(d)(3)() he deed respoent ws ae n reova roceeg on Augut 2 23 (x ) is rst ering wa o Augut 2, 23 (Tr at
I).
e was gre wo hot continuaces o d an atoey (Tr at 3,
8-9).
e apee on Seeber 2, 23 (Tr t  He to the Immtio dge ht e had re  aoey an ha to that attoey of te herg te. However e aoe  not apear  he heag or le a otce o Appee (Tr at 23). At t o te Immtio Juge dd ot qure of te reponde whether e sed to contnue proeedng to nd out wh the aoe had no apered or to n anoter attoey Nor  e mmigraon Juge as te respone wheher e wed to waive s rgt o ounse Inste, he to ge proeede wt e remova eag (r a 3) Peg were tke he respoet admie he cu legto n he oice to Apear ad oede reovilt r eing preent  he Unite te wthou auorzo n he Immgrao Juge un m removbe s arge (r t 4) Te igraon Jdge he aked te reone qetios o deerne wether he was stauorly elgbe r reief. Because e respodent s umrie, has no chre, n s pre eman i Meico the Imgrao uge coe tat the resodent was ot atutori eigibe r cceltion of reov (r at 5-6 Because e respoen i he d no r of ret to exco, e graon Judge oncuded ta e w no tautorl eigbe r aum ioing of reoval, or protecon der te Convento Agast ote (Tr a 6 ecaue e repode h bee convite of a ony te Imgrato Judge colded hat te respoent ws ot egbe r Dee Ato r Cdood Arvals
Cite as: Rogelio Chavez-Rubio, A205 656 470 (BIA Jan. 30, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->