Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Teresa Flores Razo, A092 326 584 (BIA Jan. 31, 2014)

Teresa Flores Razo, A092 326 584 (BIA Jan. 31, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 203|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reopened proceedings and remanded the record for further fact-finding relating to the respondent’s removability in light of a minute order from the trial court striking the term “embezzlement” and a reference to the respondent’s employer from the criminal indictment. The Board stated that the Department of Homeland Security bore the burden on remand of showing that the trial court amended the indictment solely so the respondent could avoid immigration consequences, citing Nath v. Gonzales, 467 F.3d 1185, 1188-89 (9th Cir. 2006). The decision was written by Member John Guendelsberger.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reopened proceedings and remanded the record for further fact-finding relating to the respondent’s removability in light of a minute order from the trial court striking the term “embezzlement” and a reference to the respondent’s employer from the criminal indictment. The Board stated that the Department of Homeland Security bore the burden on remand of showing that the trial court amended the indictment solely so the respondent could avoid immigration consequences, citing Nath v. Gonzales, 467 F.3d 1185, 1188-89 (9th Cir. 2006). The decision was written by Member John Guendelsberger.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Feb 09, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/21/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Varzandeh, Houman Varzandeh Anderson LLP 3435 Wilshire Boulevard
#
1010 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Name: FLRES RAZ, TERESA
U.S   
Executive Oce r Imigration Review
Bd  Imigi pp Oc   k
5107 leebug Pike, Sut 2000 F Cu Vgn 20530
OHS /ICE fice of Chief Counsel -LS 606 S. live Street, 8th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90014  A 092326584 Date of this notice 1 /31 /2014
Enlosed is a opy of he Boad's deisio ad oe n e aboe-eeree ase. Enosue
Pl Mb: Gdlg, h
Sinceely,
b
c
l
Doa Ca Cie Clek
schwarzA
: k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Teresa Flores Razo, A092 326 584 (BIA Jan. 31, 2014)
 
·
US
Depatment of Jusice
Execuive Oce r Imgration Revew .. Decsion of he Boad o Imgaion Appals Fs Cuc, Vigi
20530
Fle A092 326 584 Los Angeles, CA I re: TERESA LORS ZO IN RMOVAL PROCEEINGS OON Date ON BEHALF F SEN: oman azadh, Esqr APPLICATION Reopeng
JAN 31
i°4
On Dcemer 1 203, he respoe  a motion to econsier" he Boards December 3 2013 dcisio sissig her appeal e rcord wil be mande Although entitle otherwise h responent's moio is moe accuately characer as one seeking reopeg as she wishes o itrodce evidece  the oards consideaton Sectio 240(c)(7)(C) of the mmiaton an Nioalty Act, 8 USC § 1229a(c)(7)(C);
Matter of Cerna
20
&N Dec. 39 BIA 199) 8 CFR § 10032(c) Speccaly, she has sumtted a copy o a mi od om a tate cout reectng that  gane he motio to strik y mblemet d while sai endat was a aget, srvat a mploye o Soth ay Urology lagag in the complait on Sepeber 26, 203 She cotends that she s, therere no removale as chaged  dsmissing he appeal the Board essetialy note that the te mzement" was dene to include a audln act, whie Ca Peal Coe § 48a) eing the erm �the is a ivisil statu Ge this evence, we  that the c-nng s ncessary The eco is not clea as to why the alrna crmal ou graned he espodns moon to str he note langage On remad the rden wil be on the Depament o Homeland Seciy (DS) to show tha he crmnal co ganted he respoets motion solely so he could avod immigao consequeces
Se ath
v.
Gonzales,
467 F3d 185 188-89 th Ci 2006) If he HS does no meet its re the examinaion of the convcton recors wil e ecessary. O rema the mmigraio ge shod apy th mode categorical approach o the respodent's convictio a isse o deteie if he is sill emovable udr secon 237a
(
2){(iii) o he ct, 8 .S. § 227(a)(2)(A(ii), n conjucio wit ecion 0a(43)(M)(i) of the Act 8S.C01a(3)M)(i), r a oense involving ad or deci in whch h loss to te vici or vici cs $000 oh as a  vidnc on his ssu Accodngly the llowng odrs will e tered ODER he respondts motio o reopn is grantd
Cite as: Teresa Flores Razo, A092 326 584 (BIA Jan. 31, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->