Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Chapter IV-Vi Polsci79

Chapter IV-Vi Polsci79

Ratings: (0)|Views: 48 |Likes:
Published by Ryan Shimojima

More info:

Published by: Ryan Shimojima on Oct 04, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/06/2009

pdf

text

original

 
 Treatment of Data The major instruments used for the collection of the data were interview schedules andopinion polls for the History Political Science majors. The purpose of the interview wasfor the researchers to get information directly and accurately from the faculty membersof the History & Political Science department. The opinion polls, also known as thequestionnaires is for the purpose of knowing the perception, awareness and the reactionof the major students regarding the future policy, which is the topic of our study. It wasthe most effective and reliable way of securing survey information although it requiredconsiderable time, planning and training.Percentage or frequency distribution was utilized to analyze the data after these weretabulated in an orderly fashion. This made it easier for the researchers to do analysis inorder to make conclusions based on the findings. Statistical and mathematical methodswere also employed to make the data gathering simpler getting the mean, median, thepercentage of each questionnaire items and mode of the data accumulated. The data that was gathered in order to endow with the answers regarding the researchproblem were written and tabulated in a separate sheet, which was presented, analyzedand interpreted in a quantitative manner employing suitable statistical methods and theresearchers’ skills.
 
CHAPTER V – DATA PRESENTATION
In order to make the data gathering effective, we employed pie graph system forthe reason that, the figures are more noticeable and clear to look at. Pie charts clearlyillustrate the components of a proportion in relation to the whole. The data are clearlyvisible and can be understood intuitively, automatically, and very quickly.Captions of the pie graphs are backed-up with comments that the majors wrote in theircomment, suggestion & feedback portion.For these reasons, respondents have a clear understanding and comments about theproposed implementation of the uniform policy. The researchers are grateful andrecognize the value of effort of the respondents that shared their comments althoughthere are thirty two (32) respondents who chose not to give their comment.
Figure A
 
 When the respondents were asked if they’re in favor that the History and PoliticalScience major students are required to wear uniform 48% answered NO, 45% answered YES while 7% were UNDECIDED. This only shows that the majority of the respondentsdon’t agree of having uniforms.In the researchers’ survey questionnaire, there was a provision for a space forcomments, suggestions and feedbacks both for the negative and positive side. 48% of the respondents answered out of 103 respondents are not in favor of having theproposed implementation of the uniform policy because of its cost in acquiring theuniform.
“Students don’t even wear their school ID how much more on making them wear uniforms.” 
according to a respondent. Now, other colleges have already mandated theirstudents to have a proper uniform with all their other reasons why. It is not already newfor other colleges to do the same thing in their departments for proper distinction. Infact, in the Public Administration course/subject in the Political Science department of the College of Arts and Sciences also require but does not demand a proper uniform formajors who will eventually be having their duties in public offices.48% of the respondents wrote no doubt that they personally do not like to wearuniforms. Nevertheless, the thought was not expounded and properly explained by therespondents. The researchers made this into consideration because not all of the majorsare honestly not in favor of wearing a uniform. The researchers understand that theserespondents just simply do not like the thought of having a uniform.In the other hand, 45% of the respondents wrote that they agree on thisproposition if the department will implement the said uniform policy. Thus, theresearchers also took information from the department faculty through an oral andwritten interview.It is noticeable that the percentage gap of those who are favor and not favor in thefuture policy is almost close, separated only by a small percentage of those who areundecided regarding the matter.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->