Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Nonhlanhla Guguletha Ngema, A087 948 239 (BIA Feb. 5, 2014)

Nonhlanhla Guguletha Ngema, A087 948 239 (BIA Feb. 5, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 331|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record for further consideration of a request for a continuance while the respondent appealed a USCIS denial of a visa petition filed on her behalf. The Board stated that any delay by USCIS in forwarding the appeal to the Board is a factor to be considered in favor of a respondent in determining whether to grant a continuance. The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record for further consideration of a request for a continuance while the respondent appealed a USCIS denial of a visa petition filed on her behalf. The Board stated that any delay by USCIS in forwarding the appeal to the Board is a factor to be considered in favor of a respondent in determining whether to grant a continuance. The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Feb 10, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/31/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Stroud,

Randall,
sq
.
Araneda
Stroud
G
4600 Marriot Dr Suite 350 Ralegh
C 27612
U   J
Executive Oce r Immigration Review
Bd  Immg l Qc  h Ck
5107 lesburg
Pike,
Sut 0 Fa Chrc, Vgin 203
OHS /ICE ice of Cef Cousel

5701 Executive Ct D. Ste 30 Chrloe NC 2822 me:
G O G 
7-948239 Dte o ths oice 2 /5/24
Eclosed s a copy of the Board' decion ad orer in the aboe-rerenced case. Ecore
 b:  L S 
D
c
Dona Cr Chie erk
  Dk
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Nonhlanhla Guguletha Ngema, A087 948 239 (BIA Feb. 5, 2014)
 
U.S Deparmen

Jusice
_
p
xecutive Oce r Immigration Review Decisio of he Bod ommigrio Apeal F
,
Vri
253
 Fie: A087 948 239 -Chloe, NC Date
FEB
-
5

In re ONHLHA GUGLETHA NGEMA a.ka Noaa Gugueta ama IN RMOV PROCEEDINGS APPEA N BEHAL OF ESPONENT: W Randal Srod, Esqie  ON BEHAL OF DH Susa eker Assis Chief Cose CARGE  Noice ec 27(a ))C)i), &N Ac [8 SC
§
1227))C))]   Nonan volaed condions o status APPLICATION Coninance The responent, a natve  ciizen o o Aa, apeas e ecso o e mmgrao Jdge, dated May 3, 202, denyng her eues   coiuace o awa te ouome o e appeal to he Board o e dena by te nted Saes Czensp ad Imgraon Serves ("SCIS)  a vsa eion (orm I30), e o er bea by e souse Te eor  be remed r her oeedngs We eview he ndngs of c, incdng detenaons of cedibly, mae by te mgraton Jdge nde a "cerly eoneo std 8 C
§
003 {d)3)) e review al oer issues nuding sses o w, jdgment or dsreto, ue a de novo standd 8 CF
§
003()3)(i)n
M
of
Hm
24 &N Dec 785 (BI 2009), we e, a  deermng weher good ase exiss to coninue proceedings  the adjudcaion o a edng amybased vsa peion, a vety o cos may be cosdeed, ncudg b o lmted to
I
 te Dearmet of Homeld erty's esonse o te oion to contnue; 2) weter e udeyng vsa peion s pra e appovale 3)  e espondens satutoy egby r adjstme o satus ( 4) whether the espondens appaon r adjustment merts a vorabe exercse o dsreon d

he eason r e conuae d y oe reev oedua os e gaion dge coecty noed ha he CS ad dened te vsa eo ed on bea o  e responden However, te esonde appeaed e SCS deso s o yet, e apea has no bee rwded o te Boad ny delay by the SCIS n rwadg te apea o e Boad ay be osiered by e mgaon Juge as a cor  vo o e esode n whehe or ot to n a connuace

at 73 n any evet, e decso s o a e reoze ta e vsa eto ad bee dee oweer were  ovoous ea as bee  taken, suc a dena s not neessiy dsosve o esec o e questo o good case, ncudng te quesion o prma ce apovaby
Cite as: Nonhlanhla Guguletha Ngema, A087 948 239 (BIA Feb. 5, 2014)
 
(
A087
98 239 In ew o e above we nd t prudent to remand te recod n order to aow te mmaton dge to reconsder te espondents moton r a connuance e mmgraton Jdge ma so consder wee admnsatve cosure woud be appropate
See Maer of Avetisyn,
2 I&N Dec 688 (B 2012)e lowng ode wll b enterd  ORER he record s emanded  he proceedngs and the entr o a new decso 2
Cite as: Nonhlanhla Guguletha Ngema, A087 948 239 (BIA Feb. 5, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->