F r o m F r i e n d s a t P o l i t i j a b . c o m
BARNETT V OBAMA HEARINGOCTOBER 5, 2009WAVEYDAVEY REPORT11 WAVEYDAVEY REPORT ON BARNETT V OBAMA HEARING2 OCTOBER 5, 20093 As Related by Tes:45 They begin letting people into the courtroom at 8:05.6 At 8:30 the prior hearing was still going on, and TAITZ7 arrived. Then there was a recess. At 8:40 the judge8 reentered the courtroom and started up the session for9 this hearing.10 For the defense there were three individuals: WEST,11 DEJUTE, and also Eric Sauzener (phonetic) from D.C.12 WEST presented his motion. First he said he wanted to13 focus on policy issues. He essentially reiterated what14 was in his motion to dismiss; that is, anybody with a15 political agenda and filing fees could contest the16 qualifications of presidents if this was allowed to17 proceed, which affects the balance of power.18 He mentioned the other Obama cases and said, the same19 issues there. If the president is forced to go through20 depositions, and so on, for all a these various cases,21 it would affect his ability to govern.22 If even one judge decides that Obama is not qualified,23 and a second decides that he is qualified, what then?24 Chaos. It would affect the ability to conduct foreign25 policy, nuclear disarmament negotiations, and so on.
Updated 10/5/2009 6:10 PM PDT
Leave a Comment
The issue of ’spirit of the law vs. letter of the law’ in this case boils down to this: What did the Founding Fathers have in mind when they specified the Natural Born Citizen requirement for President of the United States in the Constitution? The answer is obviously avoidance of “divided loyalty”. This takes me back to square one and to my original question about Obama: Why did he feel compelled to go to Kenya and support his cousin Odinga, in light of the fact that Odinga had a deal with the radical Muslims of Kenya and Somalia to introduce Sharia Law as the one and only law in Kenya once he was elected? This at a time when the U.S. was (and obviously still is) at war with Radical Islam!!! Is this not enough proof that Obama has divided loyalties? Why is this fundamental issue not being discussed in this case?!? Has everyone become so entangled in the details and legal chess games afoot that they cannot grasp the root of the argument? Obama’s ability to lie, over and over, straight-faced into the camera to the American people has no defense. His record is clear. No Christian would skip over Prayer Day in the U.S., support abortion in its most extreme sense, skip services on his first Easter Holiday in office, etc., etc. All of his actions and his most passionate speeches here and abroad are influenced by his Muslim faith. Even Gadaffi and Farrakhan hail him as a Muslim brother. He bows down to the Saudi King and receives a golden medal from him, he cancels plans for missile defenses in Poland and the Czech Republic to help Iran with their nuclear weapon plans, he hides the fact that he has already made a deal with the United Arab Emirates to hand them nuclear technology, and on and on. Obama betrays Israel in every way possible. He begins releasing terrorists and captured enemy combatants, promising ‘Miranda Rights’ to future detainees. He surrenders our sovereignty as a nation at the G-20 and blatantly begins the deconstruction of our Independence and our Monetary System in favor of his New World Order “socialist view of the world”. He criticizes the Constitution and agrees to do away with the dollar – but not before using TARP funds and Stimulus money to pay off his Wall Street friends and benefactors. Chicago-style corruption is exploding all over the country. What more do Americans need to prove he is a fraud and needs to be removed in a legal and orderly way? If not Judge Carter, then who? The Supreme Court is powerless to do anything until all other options are exhausted. The placement of Sotomayor is null and void if the President is illegal and un-Constitutional. Biden and Pellosi are both compromised legally, as is Hillary Clinton. McCain has proven himself to be weak in his pursuit of a ‘moderate’ position and seems more interested in warming his seat in the Senate than standing up for what he knows is right. Only women like Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann and Orly Taitz are fearless enough and have enough honor and integrity to tell us the truth – only to be ignored and demonized by our out-of-control liberal media! How could all of Congress, the CIA, the FBI, and our Military allow this to happen? Someone needs to set things right. History will not be kind to cowards. God help us all if we continue to ignore this much longer. Staying positive is so extremely difficult, and our tendency to loose faith in human nature is strong, but we must persevere. Our children and our children’s children will look back on this time and know who we were when it really counted. I pray we will not let them down.