Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
TLI Communications v. Lucidiom et. al.

TLI Communications v. Lucidiom et. al.

Ratings: (0)|Views: 11 |Likes:
Published by PriorSmart
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00141-TSE-IDD: TLI Communications LLC v. Lucidiom, Inc. et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Hon. T. S. Ellis presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l9U7 for more info.
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00141-TSE-IDD: TLI Communications LLC v. Lucidiom, Inc. et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Hon. T. S. Ellis presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l9U7 for more info.

More info:

Published by: PriorSmart on Feb 12, 2014
Copyright:Public Domain

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/13/2014

pdf

text

original

 
IN
THE
UNITEDSTATESDISTRICT
COURTFORTHE
EASTERNDISTRICT
OF
VIRGINIA
(Alexandria
Division)
PF
FE6
I0
2 14
1.^ /
CLERK
Ui.
.
 
i::;j
MEXAKDRIA.
Vl-:C.^
TLI
COMMUNICATIONSLLC,
Plaintiff,
Civil
Action
No.
[istjjw
V.
LUCIDIOM,
INC.,
andRICHMONDCAMERA
SHOP,
INCORPORATED
Defendants.
JURYTRIAL
DEMANDED
COMPLAINTFORPATENTINFRINGEMENT
PlaintiffTLICommunicationsLLC TLI )filesthisComplaintforPatentInfringementagainstLucidiom,Inc. Lucidiom )andRichmondCameraShop,Incorporated RCS ),wherein,pursuantto35U.S.C.
§§271
and281,Plaintiffseeksa
judgment
of
infringementbyDefendants
of
U.S.PatentNos.6,038,295 the
 295
Patent ),damagesresultingtherefrom
pursuantto35U.S.C.§284,aswellasapreliminaryandpermanentinjunction
of
theinfringingactivitypursuantto35U.S.C.§283,andsuchotherreliefastheCourtdeems
just
andproper,
andinsupport
thereof
allegesasfollows:
The
Parties
1.PlaintiffTLIisaDelawarelimitedliabilitycorporationwithitsprincipalplace
of
businessat3422OldCapitolTrail,Suite72,Wilmington,Delaware19808.
2.
Defendant
Lucidiom,Inc.isacorporation
organizedunder
the
laws
of
theState
of
Virginia,withitsprincipalplace
of
businessat7900WestparkDrive,Suite515,McLean,
Virginia22102.
y
 
3.DefendantRichmondCameraShop,Incorporatedisacorporationorganized
underthelaws
of
theState
of
Virginia,withitsprincipalplace
of
businessat213WestBroad
Street,Richmond,Virginia23220.
 urisdiction
and
 enue
4.ThisisanactionforpatentinfringementarisingunderthePatentLaws
of
the
United
States
Title
35
of
theUnited
States
Code
5.ThisCourthassubjectmatterjurisdictionoverthisactionpursuantto28U.S.C.
§§1331and1338 a becausetheactionconcernsinfringement
of
aUnitedStatespatent.6.ThisCourthaspersonaljurisdictionoverLucidiombecauseLucidiomislocated
inthisdistrictanditconductssubstantialbusinessinthisdistrict,directlyorthrough
intermediaries,including: i atleastaportion
of
theinfringementsallegedherein;and ii regularlydoingorsolicitingbusinessinthisdistrict,engaginginotherpersistentcourses
of
conductinthisdistrictand/orderivingsubstantialrevenuefromgoodsandservicesprovidedto
individualsinthisdistrict.Further,thisCourthaspersonaljurisdictionoverLucidiombecauseit
isaVirginiacorporationandithaspurposelyavaileditself
of
theprivilegesandbenefits
of
the
laws
of
theState
of
Virginia.
7.VenueisproperinthisjudicialdistrictastoLucidiompursuantto28U.S.C.§§
1391and1400 b because,amongotherreasons,Lucidiomissubjecttopersonaljurisdictionin
thisdistrict,Lucidiomislocatedinthisdistrict,Lucidiomhasfacilitiesandemployeesinthis
district,andLucidiomhascommittedandcontinuestocommitacts
of
patentinfnngementinthis
district
8.ThisCourthaspersonaljurisdictionoverRCSbecauseRCSislocatedinthis
districtanditconductssubstantialbusinessinthisdistrict,directlyorthroughintermediaries.
 
including:(i)atleastaportion
of
theinfringementsallegedherein;and(ii)regularlydoingor
solicitingbusinessinthisdistrict,engaginginotherpersistentcourses
of
conductinthisdistrict
and/orderivingsubstantialrevenuefromgoodsandservicesprovidedtoindividualsinthis
district.Further,thisCourthaspersonaljurisdictionoverRCSbecauseitisaVirginiacorporationandithaspurposelyavaileditself
of
theprivilegesandbenefits
of
thelaws
of
the
State
of
Virginia.
9.VenueisproperinthisjudicialdistrictastoRCSpursuantto28U.S.C.§§1391and1400(b)because,amongotherreasons,RCSissubjecttopersonaljurisdictioninthisdistrict,
RCSislocatedinthisdistrict,RCShasfacilitiesandemployeesinthisdistrict,andRCShas
committedandcontinuestocommitacts
of
patentinfringementinthisdistrict.
10.Joinderisproperunder35U.S.C.§299because,andasexplainedfurtherbelow,LucidiomandRCSarejointlyandseverallyliableforinfringementarisingout
of
thesameseries
of
transactionsoroccurrencesrelatedtotheuseandsale
of
thesameinfringingplatform.
Questionsandfactscommontoalldefendantswillariseintheaction.
The
 atent in Suit
11.TLIistheowner
of
the'295Patententitled ApparatusandMethodfor
Recording,CommunicatingandAdministeringDigitalImages, whichtheUnitedStatesPatent
 TrademarkOfficelawfrillyanddulyissuedonMarch14,2000.Atrueandcorrectcopy
of
the
 295
Patentisattachedhereto
asExhibit
A
FactualBackground
12.Dr.HeinzMattesisthenamedinventor
of
the'295patent.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->