Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Bus Bar Design and Protection

Bus Bar Design and Protection

Ratings: (0)|Views: 4,836|Likes:

More info:

Published by: MohammedSaadaniHassani on Oct 06, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





The bus arrangements evaluated in this paper are:-Single breaker - single bus-Double bus with bus tie-Double bus - single breaker-Double bus - double breaker-Ring bus-Breaker-and-a-half bus-Main and transfer bus-No bus - The Tapped Line
Single breaker - Single bus
This is the most basic and simple bus arrangement. The bus can readily be protectedby a bus differential relay utilizing line-side CTs on all breakers. It is an economicalinstallation utilizing a minimum number of breakers and no breaker bypass facilities.Maintenance on breaker or relays requires the removal of the line associated with thebreaker. Single breaker/single bus arrangements are primarily used to service industrialapplications where lines 1 and 2 terminate at a remote bus and lines 3 and 4 terminateat a remote bus. Thus the removal of line 1 would not disrupt service to the remote bussupplied by lines 1 and 2. Provisions must be made to insure that each line can ad-equately carry the total load.
Figure B1: Single Breaker, single bus
Double bus with bus tie
This bus arrangement is a logical extension of the single breaker/single bus conceptwith provisions to isolate two bus sections. The installation of a bus tie breaker T cre-ates two bus sections, A and B. Under these conditions a bus fault will de-energize twoline sections while retaining service to the remaining two line sections. This type of installation is used where two lines terminate at one bus. For example, line 1 and line 3would terminate at a common bus and line 2 and line 4 would terminate at a commonbus. Thus the loss of either bus section would not interrupt service to the remote busterminals. However, a circuit must be removed for breaker or relay maintenance and afailure in breaker T will de-energize the entire station.
Figure B2: Double bus with bus tie
Double bus - Single breaker
Fig. B3 depicts the normal setup of a double bus/single breaker scheme. Breakers F1and F2 are served from bus 1 and employ a bus differential arrangement from the line-side CTs of the feeder breakers and the bus 2 side CTs of breaker T. A similar busdifferential arrangement is employed around breakers F3, F4, and T. This bus arrange-ment differs from the double bus with bus tie because it utilizes the tie breaker as aspare breaker when maintenance is to be done on any feeder breaker. A bus fault willde-energize two circuits. Therefore, this scheme is usually used where two lines (ex-ample - F1 and F3) terminate to a common bus. F2 and F4 would also terminate on acommon bus.
Figure B3: Double bus, single breaker (Normal)
Fig. B4 depicts breaker F1 off line and out for maintenance. Breaker T can be utilizedas a spare breaker where bus 1 becomes an extension of line 1. To accomplish this, F2must be transferred to bus 2 and the differential scheme for bus 2 must accommodatebreaker F2. It can be seen that the switching arrangements can be complicated andsubject to misoperation. Under normal conditions a fault in the tie breaker T will resultin a complete station outage.
Figure B4: Double bus, single breaker (F1 off line)

Activity (165)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Muhammad Kaleem liked this
boopelectra liked this
Toraj Tavassoli liked this
manoj liked this
powermurugan liked this
Deepak liked this
Muhammad Kaleem liked this
Nestor liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->