Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Unavailable
Patronage Politics Divides Us: A Study of Poverty, Patronage and Inequality in South Africa
Unavailable
Patronage Politics Divides Us: A Study of Poverty, Patronage and Inequality in South Africa
Unavailable
Patronage Politics Divides Us: A Study of Poverty, Patronage and Inequality in South Africa
Ebook193 pages2 hours

Patronage Politics Divides Us: A Study of Poverty, Patronage and Inequality in South Africa

Rating: 2 out of 5 stars

2/5

()

Currently unavailable

Currently unavailable

About this ebook

Patronage Politics Divides Us is the culmination of a research project that forms part of MISTRA's first suite of eight priority research projects. The research explores the relationship between patronage, poverty, and inequality with a particular focus on its impact on the conduct of local politics. The overall aim of the study was to explore the possibility of constituting public institutions in a manner that enables them to become legitimate arbiters between the various interests, rather than as instruments that are captured by contending interest groups for their own accumulation. Most importantly, this study was necessitated by the realization that postapartheid patronage politics has not received sufficient scholarly attention. The report is a profile of socioeconomic life in South Africa's various communities as experienced not only by locals but also by foreign-born residents. The findings provide a window on relationships between councilors, business interests, and local party organizations.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateFeb 1, 2014
ISBN9781920655822
Unavailable
Patronage Politics Divides Us: A Study of Poverty, Patronage and Inequality in South Africa

Related to Patronage Politics Divides Us

Related ebooks

Social Science For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Patronage Politics Divides Us

Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
2/5

2 ratings1 review

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    This is a well-meaning – even earnest – book. The authors show a deep-felt concern for the ways in which poor South Africans are caught up in the toils of “political patronage”. Most of the book is well-written and easy to read. It comes with a helpful list of recommendations.But the book does not “work”. Starting with a theoretical framework guided by US writings on patronage politics, it fails to convince one that this is a useful model for interpreting South Africa. In SA, patronage fails people because it does not provide the alternative route to services, houses and jobs that marks the particular systems of patronage in the US. The point in SA is that the patronage characteristics of local government do not in fact provide for the needs of the community. People follow this or that faction of local politicians because of hopes and promises, not because anyone commands a functioning patronage machine like Tammany Hall. Local politicians provide public work programme jobs, Community Development Worker posts and maybe housing list places for a tiny proportion of those to whom they make promises. The problem for the people is not patronage politics, but the fact that supporting the patron does not lead to the promised results.The heart of the book is stories from five poor areas – Diepsloot in Joburg, Overstrand (Hermanus), Tsolo and Qumbu in the Eastern Cape and two municipalities in Free State. These touch on well-known problems: xenophobia, fishing rights, nepotism (including jobs for friends), the critical role of state grants, the manipulation of ‘lists’ and so on. Interviews and focus groups were used to gather data and little is new or surprising – although I did not know that SASSA issued free paraffin along with the social grants. The word “patronage” is sprinkled through the pages. But there is no rounding conclusion to convince one that patronage politics is what drives local politics. The authors say that “political patronage happens when state resources are used to reward individuals in return for their political support.” This is not actually demonstrated by the case studies. People respond to the promises and blandishments of politicians by supporting them with votes, but very few get the expected rewards from state resources. This is why communities are so angry. The problem is not “patronage politics” but that is does not work for people. It only works for politicians and even for them it often works only temporarily – particularly at the local level. New factions emerge supporting alternative promisers, who also cannot “deliver”. Turmoil is the result. Citing a US academic, Frank Sorauf, the authors make use of a definition of patronage as “an incentive system – ‘a political currency with which to purchase political activities and political responses’”. Sorauf’s “political currency” in South Africa is counterfeit!It may be wrong to suspect that the theoretical underpinnings for the book, such as they are, come from a Google Scholar search for articles with “patronage” in their title. But it is remarkable that the authors by-pass alternative African scholarly literature on patrimonialism and neo-patrimonialism and that they devote many pages to worthy US writings of Sorauf, Scott Bearfield and others. This is a diversion which does not solve any questions raised in the fieldwork reports.The authors point out repeatedly that conflict in local government revolves around struggles for positions in party structures. Perhaps explicit mention should have been made of an unusual feature of South African democracy – the recognition of local government in the Constitution and the direct and equitable funding of local government through the Division of Revenue Act. These provisions, enacted to decentralize power to the people and to enable democracy, have set up local government as a terrain of struggle over resources. In other countries in Africa, local authorities have power (and often financing) that is derived from national or state governments, and which can be granted or denied at the whim of national politicians. This is not the case in SA, where local authorities are recognized as a co-equal sphere of government. Local authorities have original powers based in the Constitution and resources guaranteed from the national fiscus. There really is something to fight about. Perhaps the most insightful section of the book is the short analysis note on Political office as a source of employment – power struggles. “The political rivalry amongst the local elites is spurred by spoils of office.” This is followed by a list of recommendations, including one to “Eliminate factionalism within parties …factional patronage politics has the tendency to attract crooks who by mimicking and exaggerating factional conspiracies, entrench themselves in parties and aggravate poor service delivery.”The other recommendations, such as fighting corruption, selecting candidates for local government based on democracy and merit, enforcing accountability and ensuring that people know their rights are all spot on.Political will is the missing element – and where will that come from?