Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Luis Alberto Rivas-Camader, A040 111 602 (BIA Feb. 7, 2014)

Luis Alberto Rivas-Camader, A040 111 602 (BIA Feb. 7, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 813|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) held that "trafficking" of illegal drugs under Fla. Stat. 893.135(1)(c)(1)(c) is not an aggravated felony under INA 101(a)(43)(B) because state law defines the term to encompasses simple possession, and because the statute does not proscribe conduct that is a felony under the federal drug laws. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley and joined by Member Anne Greer and by Member John Guendelsberger.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) held that "trafficking" of illegal drugs under Fla. Stat. 893.135(1)(c)(1)(c) is not an aggravated felony under INA 101(a)(43)(B) because state law defines the term to encompasses simple possession, and because the statute does not proscribe conduct that is a felony under the federal drug laws. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley and joined by Member Anne Greer and by Member John Guendelsberger.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Feb 20, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/12/2014

pdf

text

original

 
RIVAS-CAMADER, LUIS ABERTO 534737/A040111602 GULF CORRECTIONA INS. AEX 699 IKE S TEELE ROAD WEWAHITEHKA FL 32465 Nam: RIVAS·CAMADER LUIS ALBER ..
US Dprtnt of ustc
Executive Oce r Immgrato Review
Board of Immigration Appeals Oce of he Clerk
5107 Lebug Pike, Sute 2000 Fas Clrch Vgna 20530
S/IC Oice of Chief Counsel RG1 333 South Mam Avenue, Suit 200 Mim L 33130 A 040111602 Dae of s notice 2/7204
closed  a cpy f he Boad's decsn ad de  e above-eece case. ncos
P Mb: G, A J. y Rg Gdg h
Sceey,
D
c
t
Dna Ca Ce Clek
wilame  k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Luis Alberto Rivas-Camader, A040 111 602 (BIA Feb. 7, 2014)
 

U.S
Department of Jusice
Executive Oce r Immation Revew Fas Church, Vrgnia
2053
ile A040·111 602 -i, FL I e: LS AERTO RIV ASCAAER IN REOVA PROEEING APEAL O BEHAF O RESPONENT: Pro s ON EALF OF S HARGE: Chsti Myk Assis Chf Cosel
Decso of he Board of grato Appeals
te
FEB
-
7 2014
 Nie: Se 237()(2)(A)(ii),
I&N
A [8 US§ 1227()(2)(A)(ii)] Cvied of wo o more rme ivovig mor trpitde Se 27()(2)(A)(iii),
&N
A 8 U.S 1227()(2)(A)(iii)ovited of ggvted lo APPICATION Teiio The repode  iv d itize of dor ppl om he migri dges disio ded Ags 15, 2013, stiig both hrges of reovbiiy d odeig  spode removed m the ied Ss The Dptt of omld Suit (S) opposes the pp The ppe wi be ssied We review r le eo e digs o t ildig th deemitio of redibiliy mde by he grio dge 8 C.FR § 003(d)(3)(i) We eview d ov ll ohe issus, iudig wheter th pies hve met the relev bde f proof d isses of disreio 8 FR § 1003{d)(3)(ii). A
a
iiti m, we gee wi e Immigrio udge ht e spode's oviio  rkig i ilegl dgs pr o sei 89 15(1 )( ){ 1 ( ) of he orid Stes is  oviti  imigio rposes The erm "oviio is deed to iude  rml jdge of gt of h lie eered by  ou
See
setio 10()(48)(A)i) of he mgrio d y A,  .  11A h or us  gm whih idies h he espode ws ud gil by he Cii Co, 13h dii ii i d r ilborogh Couy, oid of rfkig i ileg drugs owg  pe of guiy
(I.J
t 2; Ex. 2) Aodigy, the espodet ws ovied of ht oee wihi te eig of he A
Cite as: Luis Alberto Rivas-Camader, A040 111 602 (BIA Feb. 7, 2014)
 
040 111 60 Te mmigration Judge cnuded that the esponens coniction r trafcking in illeal rugs was n aggrated feny witin the mening of secion 0(a)(43)(B) of e ct ad sustained the chage of remoability pursat  secton 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the c 8 U.SC § 127()()(A)(ii) (J at 3). Athough te respondens onse was denominated
"trafking in ilegal ugs, Floia law denes that te o inclde simple possession oenses Any pesn wh kowingly sels, purchases, manuctures, deiers, or bings nto ts state,
 or who is kowngly n actual o cnsuctve posesson o
gms or moe of ay moie, opium, oxycdone, hydoodone, yomoone, or ay salt, deitie, ismr, o sat of an isome heeof, including erin  o 4 grms or more of ny mixt conaning ny sh substnce, ut lss tha 30 kilogams of sch substnce o mixture, commits  lony of the rst degee ... own as "trafcking in ilegal dgs, . Florida Staues § 893135()(c) (emhasis adde) And eed the ciminal inrmatin indictes tht te esponent was carge with simple pssessin, not "tracking as tat te is odiniy ndestod (Exh. ). ccodingy, the espondents oense is not  aggrated lony ndr the "llct akg clause of secton 10(a)(43)(B) of  Act
Mate f Das,
20 I&N Dec 536, 5 (BA 992) (dning "ilicit tracking is a cntrolled substnce as "unlaw trading or dealing). Mreoe, te espondents simle pssession oense does not quai as an ggaated lony uner te "dg afcking cime ase of section 10 (a)(43)(B) ecause it oes  proscie cndct punisale as a ony nder the Fdera dug laws
See Lopez v. Gonzales,
549 US 47 (2006) Thus, te DHS did nt meet its udn of demonstrating te espondent's emoaility under section 237()(2)(A)(ii) of te Act
See
section 40(c)(3)(A) of the ct, 8 .C § 1229a(c)(3)(A) In igt f egoing, we nd it necessary to remnd te ecod  the mmation Jdge o rte cnsider the remang chge f emoabiy ad, f neessay, to consder ny relief r which he responden may be eigile In etemining wheher the DH me its buden of demonsting a respden's emoaiiy under secton 237(a)()(A)(ii) of he ct, te mmigration Judge sould specicaly identify any eience eie on and explain te easns r e ccusions in her o or wie decisio
See Matte f S-H-
23 &N Dec 46 (BIA 00)
Mate of
A-P,
 & Dec 468, 474 (BI 999) On remnd, both paies shd be aoded the oppouniy to pate the eidentiay record nd present additiona ega gmens n mnding, we expess o opinin on the utimate outcome of tese poceedings.
See Mater of -0-G-
 & Dec. 43 (BIA 199) Te lowing ordr sal e etered ORDER: Te respondent's appea is sustaine, e mmigration Judges decision is acated i
 pa,
he aggraae o chrge of remabi is ismisse, a the recod is remanded  rter proceedings consisent wih e egoing opinn 2
Cite as: Luis Alberto Rivas-Camader, A040 111 602 (BIA Feb. 7, 2014)

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->