• Embed Doc
  • Copy Link
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Mr. Saurabh Singh, MBA, AMT, Fellow ISMDepartment of Financial Management; College of AgribusinessManagement G. B.Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar – 263145,Uttarakhand, India2009
‘
Death of National Sovereignty’ &/OR ‘Birth of Global Governance’ 1 |Page
THE CASE HAS BEEN DEVELOPED TO PROVIDE ORIENTATION TOWARDS PRESENT INTERNATIONAL TRADEENVIRONMENT AND NEED OF A NEW REGULATORY MECHANISM, TO THE STUDENTS PURSUING SECOND YEAR OF MBA[FINANCE] PROGRAM, OFFERED BY THE COLLEGE OF AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT.
2009
DEATH OF NATIONALSOVEREIGNITY &/ORBIRTH OF GLOBAL
 
Mr. Saurabh Singh, MBA, AMT, Fellow ISMDepartment of Financial Management; College of AgribusinessManagement G. B.Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar – 263145,Uttarakhand, India2009
Birth and Death of National Sovereignty
 
&/OR
Birth of Global Governance
An effort to trace the history of theorizing ‘
International Relations’
, and itsstrong intellectual tradition, makes one encounter the fact that this traditionwas born with the formation of more than one society on the mother planetearth. Theorizing regionalism also has a long enough tradition, if not entirelysuccessful, pedigree. The only caution, before starting the journey further into the situation detailed is that theorizing about
‘Global Governance’
should not confused with or misinterpreted as a near sibling of ‘
International Relations’.
 The same is being said due to the fact that theorizing about
‘Global Governance
has been in vogue just from the time when
Cold War 
stretched between the two power full nations of the world came to an end oran era when NATO nearly became irrelevant or redundant organization. Inother words the same may also be explained as a fashion whose birth couldbe traced to the
‘Post Cold War Era’
. It is the same era which might alsorefer to as the
‘Era of Globalization’
. The aim of this piece of write up is tocomprehend the sense contained in the ongoing discussion on
‘Global Governance’
, and simultaneously efforts will also be directed towardsexploring various recent developments and previous literatures present, soas to develop the capability to contribute in the ongoing discussion in aconstructive manner.In the Post Cold War Era or Era of Globalization, the birth of 
EuropeanUnion
has added some salt and spice in the boiling curry. Probably this alsoprovides the philosophers, scholars, teachers, practicetionors and lot othergroups interest in the phenomena. And added dimension for exploration. Thepresently prevailing & competing perspectives, for heuristic, [a commonsense rule (or set of rules) intended to increase the probability of solvingproblem], purpose have been classified as (1) American Exceptionlist; and(2) European pluralist. Studying this classification, one may know aboutevolution of thought over the years; which may be vaguely clubbed as
‘
Death of National Sovereignty’ &/OR ‘Birth of Global Governance’ 2 |Page
THE CASE HAS BEEN DEVELOPED TO PROVIDE ORIENTATION TOWARDS PRESENT INTERNATIONAL TRADEENVIRONMENT AND NEED OF A NEW REGULATORY MECHANISM, TO THE STUDENTS PURSUING SECOND YEAR OF MBA[FINANCE] PROGRAM, OFFERED BY THE COLLEGE OF AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT.
 
Mr. Saurabh Singh, MBA, AMT, Fellow ISMDepartment of Financial Management; College of Agribusiness ManagementG. B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar – 263145,Uttarakhand, India
 
Mr. Saurabh Singh, MBA, AMT, Fellow ISMDepartment of Financial Management; College of AgribusinessManagement G. B.Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar – 263145,Uttarakhand, India2009
(i)Post World was – II Era;(ii)Post Cold War Era;Somehow, one competitive perspective that failed continuously to getattention of concerned scholars was the “Emergence of Asian Giants”. Nowin context of the mentioned fact, now there emerge in all three distinctperspectives, as grouped below:(i)Post World was – II Era;(ii)Post Cold War Era; and(iii)Emerging Asian Giants. Thus, the classification provided to competitive perspectives may includeone more branch in its domain. Now this inclusion will now make totalcompeting perspectives three in number, with short hand discipline as:[I] American Exceptionalist;[II] European Pluralist; and[III] Asian IntellectualsA brief discussion & deliberations on the events, from 1945 to till presenttime, i.e. 2009, becomes a must; before embarking on auspicious andambitious journey of getting to comprehend or contribute upon the issue of Birth of Global Governance and/or Death of Nationalism. It is also essential toprofile and lock the events and policies in a chronological manner; so as tounderstand the inter-play of these impacts on each-other, as one shapes theother.
Global Governance
Globalization has exacerbate the need for new understandings (bothnormative and analytical) of governance to cope with the challenges itthrows up.2 The key problem generated by globalization is the disjuncturethat exists between market structures and governance structures. AsKeohane (2001) has noted interdependence and the lack of governance,when combined, make a deadly mixture. Most importantly, however defined,globalization has become the principal metaphor aroid which political contest
‘
Death of National Sovereignty’ &/OR ‘Birth of Global Governance’ 3 |Page
THE CASE HAS BEEN DEVELOPED TO PROVIDE ORIENTATION TOWARDS PRESENT INTERNATIONAL TRADEENVIRONMENT AND NEED OF A NEW REGULATORY MECHANISM, TO THE STUDENTS PURSUING SECOND YEAR OF MBA[FINANCE] PROGRAM, OFFERED BY THE COLLEGE OF AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...