Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
6Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
AereoPetitioners

AereoPetitioners

Ratings: (0)|Views: 5,057|Likes:
Published by Eriq Gardner
@eriqgardner
@eriqgardner

More info:

Published by: Eriq Gardner on Feb 24, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/25/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 N
O
.
 
13-461
In the
Supreme Court of the United States
 ________________
 A 
MERICAN
B
ROADCASTING
C
OMPANIES
,
 
I
NC
.;
 
D
ISNEY
E
NTERPRISES
,
 
I
NC
.;
 
CBS
 
B
ROADCASTING
I
NC
.;
 
CBS
 
S
TUDIOS
I
NC
.;
 
NBCU
NIVERSAL
M
EDIA 
,
 
LLC;
 
NBC
 
S
TUDIOS
,
 
LLC;
 
U
NIVERSAL
N
ETWORK
T
ELEVISION
,
 
LLC;
 
T
ELEMUNDO
N
ETWORK
G
ROUP
LLC;
 
WNJU-TV
 
B
ROADCASTING
LLC;
 
WNET;
 
THIRTEEN
 
P
RODUCTIONS
,
 
LLC;
 
F
OX
T
ELEVISION
S
TATIONS
,
 
I
NC
.;
 
T
WENTIETH
C
ENTURY
F
OX
F
ILM
C
ORPORATION
;
 
WPIX,
 
LLC;
 
U
NIVISION
T
ELEVISION
G
ROUP
,
 
I
NC
.;
 
T
HE
U
NIVISION
N
ETWORK
L
IMITED
P
 ARTNERSHIP
;
 AND
P
UBLIC
B
ROADCASTING
S
ERVICE
,
 Petitioners
, v.  A 
EREO
,
 
I
NC
.,
 F
/
/
 A
B
 AMBOOM
L
 ABS
,
 
I
NC
.,
Respondent
.  ________________ 
 On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
 ________________ 
 BRIEF FOR PETITIONERS
 
 ________________ P
 AUL
M.
 
S
MITH
*
 
M
 ATTHEW
E.
 
P
RICE
 
JENNER
 
&
 
BLOCK 
 
LLP
 
1099
 
New York Ave. NW,
 
Ste. 900
 
Washington, DC 20001
 
(202) 639-6060
 
psmith@jenner.com
 
P
 AUL
D.
 
C
LEMENT
 
Counsel of Record
E
RIN
E.
 
M
URPHY 
 BANCROFT PLLC 1919 M Street NW, Ste. 470 ashington, DC 20036 (202) 234-0090 pclement@bancroftpllc.com
 
 Additional Counsel Information on Inside Cover
February 24, 2014
 
 
R
ICHARD
L.
 
S
TONE
*
 
 A 
MY
M.
 
G
 ALLEGOS
 
JENNER
 
&
 
BLOCK 
 
LLP
 
633 West 5th Street
 
Los Angeles, CA 90071
 
(213) 239-5100
 
B
RUCE
P.
 
ELLER
 
J
EFFREY
P.
 
C
UNARD
 
DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON
 
LLP
 
919 Third Avenue, 31st Floor
 
New York, NY 10022
 
(212) 909-6000
 
*
 Counsel for Petitioners WNET; THIRTEEN Productions, LLC; Fox Television Stations, Inc.; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation; WPIX, LLC; Univision Television Group, Inc.; The Univision Network Limited Partnership; and Public Broadcasting Service.
 
† 
 Counsel for Petitioners American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.; Disney Enterprises, Inc.; CBS  Broadcasting Inc.; CBS Studios Inc.; NBCUniversal Media, LLC; NBC Studios, LLC; Universal Network Television, LLC; Telemundo Network Group LLC; and WNJU 
 – 
TV Broadcasting LLC.
 
QUESTION PRESENTED
 A copyright holder possesses the exclusive right
“to perform the copyrighted work publicly.” 17 U.S.C.
§ 106(4). In the Copyright Act of 1976, Congress
defined the phrase “[t]o perform … ‘publicly’” to include, among other things, “to transmit or otherwise
comm
unicate a performance or display of the work …
to the public, by means of any device or process, whether the members of the public capable of receiving the performance or display receive it in the same place or in separate places and at the same time or at
different times.”
Id.
 § 101. Congress enacted that provision with the express intent to bring within the scope of the public-performance right services that retransmit over-the-air television broadcasts to the public. Respondent Aereo offers just such a service.  Aereo captures over-the-air television broadcasts and, without obtaining authorization from or compensating anyone, retransmits that programming to tens of thousands of members of the public over the Internet for a profit. According to the Second Circuit, because  Aereo sends each of its subscribers an individualized transmission of a performance from a unique copy of each copyrighted program, it is not transmitting
performances “to the public,” but rather is engaged in tens of thousands of “private” performances to paying
strangers. The question on which this Court granted certiorari is:
Whether a company “publicly performs” a
copyrighted television program when it retransmits a broadcast of that program to thousands of paid subscribers over the Internet.

Activity (6)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->