Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Recon Optical

Recon Optical

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,061|Likes:
Published by thekingfisher1
ILLINOIS COMPANY CHARGES ISRAEL TRIED TO GAIN TECHNOLOGY SECRETS, 19 August 1986, The New York Times.

Firm Says Israel Tried to Steal Technical Secrets Embassy Denies Charge Involving Reconnaissance Camera and Blames Contract Dispute, 20 August 1986, The Washington Post.
ILLINOIS COMPANY CHARGES ISRAEL TRIED TO GAIN TECHNOLOGY SECRETS, 19 August 1986, The New York Times.

Firm Says Israel Tried to Steal Technical Secrets Embassy Denies Charge Involving Reconnaissance Camera and Blames Contract Dispute, 20 August 1986, The Washington Post.

More info:

Categories:Business/Law, Finance
Published by: thekingfisher1 on Oct 13, 2009
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/08/2014

pdf

text

original

 
ILLINOIS COMPANY CHARGES ISRAEL TRIED TO GAIN TECHNOLOGY SECRETS
By RICHARD L. BERKE, Special to the New York Times19 August 1986The New York TimesLate City Final EditionCopyright 1986 The New York Times Company. All Rights Reserved.WASHINGTON, Aug. 18 -- Justice Department and Customs Service officials said tonight that they wereinvestigating a dispute in which an Illinois company has accused the Israeli Government of trying to take itstechnological secrets.The company, Recon Optical Inc. of Barrington, Ill., was to produce aerial reconnaissance cameras for Israelunder a five-year, $40 million contract signed in October 1984, according to Larry G. Larson, the company's president and chief executive officer.Mr. Larson said in a telephone interview tonight that the company ended the contract in May and filed a civillawsuit in Federal District Court in Manhattan, charging that Israel had not paid its bills and had breached theagreement in other ways.In researching the civil case, Mr. Larson said, his company found evidence that undercover agents from Israelhad infiltrated the plant ''and were routinely transferring data to a company in Israel.'' He said Recon had filed asupplemental complaint with those allegations.Asher Naim, a spokesman for the Israeli Embassy, denied tonight that Israel was looking for secrets. Hedescribed the situation as nothing more than ''an argument between a supplier and an orderer.'' He called thecompany's allegations ''completely groundless.'' Israeli Charges Intimidation''I personally feel that the whole thing is intimidation by the company,'' Mr. Naim said. ''We do 3,000 purchasingcontracts a year. There's only an argument with about 1 percent or a half percent of them.''Government officials said they had no evidence of any Israeli violation of Federal law.''The Israelis had the proper licenses and went through the proper channels in their contract,'' said a JusticeDepartment official. Nevertheless, Federal officials said they began a preliminary investigation of the dispute because of the sensitivenature of Israeli-American relations on security issues.''The State Department has a vested interest in this,'' a Federal official said, ''and so does the Justice Department.''Mr. Larson said he approached Federal authorities after he found documents indicating that Israel was spying onthe company. No Security Breach Is SeenFederal officials monitoring the dispute said they had found no indication that United States security had beenthreatened.They speculated that Israel, without breaking any laws, might have been trying to gain more from the contractthan Recon wanted to provide.''Instead of trying to settle just for the product, they were trying to take the technology, too,'' a United StatesCustoms official said of the Israelis.Israeli officials contend that Recon has not fulfilled the contract and must turn over the equipment that it agreedto provide.Recon specializes in surveillance devices and precision optical lens equipment. It has annual sales of about $100million and employs 1,150 people.In the past, the company has had many contracts with the United States Government and foreign nations, and ithas done business with Israel for 20 years, Mr. Larson said.
 
A12
Firm Says Israel Tried to Steal Technical Secrets Embassy Denies Charge InvolvingReconnaissance Camera and Blames Contract Dispute
Charles R. Babcock Washington Post Staff Writer 20 August 1986The Washington Post(Copyright 1986)A Chicago manufacturer of sophisticated aerial reconnaissance cameras has accused the Israeligovernment of trying to steal the firm's technical secrets and pass them to a competing Israeli company.The Israeli Embassy yesterday denied the allegations and said the issue was a contract dispute.Recon/Optical Inc. of Barrington, Ill., sued the Israeli government in May after the firm canceled a $40million contract signed in late 1984 to provide the Israeli air force with new reconnaissance cameras.The cameras, according to company officials, can take detailed photographs of objects on the groundfrom a jet 100 miles away and transmit them instantly to an earth receiving station.Larry Larson, president of the company, said in a telephone interview yesterday and in a sworn courtstatement that he uncovered evidence of technology theft in late May after examining documents beingcarried out of his plant by three Israeli air force officers after the contract was canceled.Some of the documents were in Hebrew. Translations attached to the civil suit filed in a New York federal court said that the Israelis were making plans to pass on the Recon technology to "El Op,"which the company asserts is a reference to Israel Electric Optical Industry, and to arrange to have anEl Op "undercover representative" attend meetings at the American plant and preside over the reviewof the contract for the Israeli air force."As they were stealing our data they had an elaborate system set up between the {Israeli} air force anda commercial company including them {El Op representatives} coming in as air force people so theywould know exactly what we were doing," Larson said.The Israelis were entitled to the cameras produced by his company, but not the underlying technology,Larson said. He said that because the technology, although unclassified, is subject to export restrictions,evidence in the case had been given to the U.S. Customs Service. A customs spokesman confirmedyesterday that his agency is reviewing Larson's allegations, which were first disclosed in the ChicagoTribune.The Israeli Embassy said in statement yesterday that Recon had "repudiated a contract" followings its"failure to extract from the government of Israel compensation for Recon's cost overruns. Israel's procurement mission intends to recover the payments made to date, which are protected by a letter of credit. Recon/Optical seems willing to do anything to avoid payment . . . including publication of falseaccusations."Asher Naim, an embassy spokesman, added that Larson's accusation that the Hebrew documentsindicate industrial espionage is "completely baseless.""If they have proof, I'm sure it will be investigated," Naim said, adding that Israel is ready to argue themerits of the contract dispute in court.In his affidavit, Larson said the three Israeli officers tried to take 50,000 pages of notes and documents,some of which comprised "the heart of much of our business."Recon does most of its business for the U.S. and foreign governments, Larson said. The court papers

Activity (2)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->