• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
Pre Reading QuestionsRank the following communication devices and protocols according to how often you use each oneon any given day ('1' being most often and '10' being least often): cell phones for text messaging;cell phones for e-mail; cell phones for calls; computers for instant messaging; computers for talkingusing VOIP technology (e.g. Skype); computers for social networking Web sites likeMySpace.com, Facebook.com, or other blog sites; computers for e-mail; computers and Web cams;'smart phones' such as BlackBerrys; two-way pagers for text messaging).Post Reading Questionsa.What methods are today's teenagers using to communicate with each other? b. What is “Generation M”?c. According to the article, how do these forms of communication affect the way peoplespeak to each other?d. According to Bobby Abramson, what is the major societal issue regarding communicationon the Internet?e. Do you agree or disagree with his statement that “Online engagement is not a viablesubstitute for a functional in-person social life”? Why or why not?f. What benefit of instant messaging does Jessica Cohen find most thrilling?g. Why do you think adults are not as interested in instant messaging as teenagers are?h. What social benefits do text messaging and instant messaging provide to teenagers?i. Why do you think girls ages 15-17 use the Internet to communicate more than other demographic groups, as reported by the Pew Internet & American Life Project? j. Do depth, longevity and face-to-face contact matter in a friendship? Why or why not?DiscussionChoose a device that you use to communicate with and answer the following questions:-What is your assigned device?-How do people communicate with it?-What is your experience with this form of communication? What role, if any, does it play in your daily life or the lives of people you know?-How much does it cost to communicate this way on average, per month?-What are the short-term and long-term benefits, drawbacks and other effects of this form of communication?-In ten years, how might a extensive use of this technology shape how you communicate withothers, both positively and negatively? Consider social skills such as making eye contact and publicspeaking. How might it also affect your sensory abilities, such as vision, hearing, etc.?Analyze the following quotes:“The more elaborate our means of communication, the less we communicate,”“The newest computer can merely compound, at speed, the oldest problem in the relations betweenhuman beings, and in the end the communicator will be confronted with the old problem, of whatto say and how to say it,”
 
The Overconnecteds
By BETSY ISRAEL
IT sounds like the name of a painting: Lone Adult Outside Teenager’s Door, Knocking. Next to it let’s hang a portrait of the other side: Teenager Sends Instant Messages Amid Aural Mess — the iTunes, the TV and the DVD’sthat form a wall of sound to camouflage whatever is being said into the cellphone. In the film version, Teenager eventually opens door, stares at Adult. Then, with excruciating patience and a huge implied “duh!,” Teenager explains that he/she is Talking. “To. My. Friends.” From deep inside the room, an I.M. door, the sound effectsignaling friends signing on or off, slams shut.As they would explain if they had time, these teenagers, all members of Generation M (born circa 1980 to 2000),have hundreds more friends than you, the adult, had at their age, or ever. And without having to leave their rooms.According to the Pew Internet & American Life Project, 87 percent of 12- to 17-year-olds, or 21 million children,are regularly online — 11 million at least once a day — and so the figures go for pages: 75 percent use instantmessaging (82 percent of them by seventh grade) and 84 percent own cellphones and iPods (in a hierarchy of coolcolors) as well as laptops, BlackBerrys and other P.D.A.’s. Those who cannot afford them still manage to “get on” — at friends’ houses, Internet cafes or libraries — and 78 percent use school computers to shop online or to check their e-mail.For Gen M (that’s “millennial,” according to sociologists, not “media”), to be “on” with your friends is a birthright.Many first played with computers in preschool, installed (then explained) the family TiVo at age 9 and opened AOLInstant Messenger, or AIM, accounts at 10. “It started in a baby way in second grade,” explains Laurice Fox, 16, a junior at Brooklyn Friends, a private preparatory school. “We all e-mailed because that’s when AOL firstintroduced AIM. Even if the computer was in the family room, and we were discussing play dates, we were there atthe start!”Bobby Abramson, a senior at the Dalton School onManhattan’s Upper East Side, recalls watching his father surf the Internet “way back in the early 90’s, long beforeanyone else, and so it had this kind of magical quality.” He adds, “I still remember picking up the phone and tryingto talk to the modem.” Now, as they move through high school, college and beyond, the generation’s seemingly obsessive need to connecthas inspired concern and debate among many adults. To summarize: What are the psychological implications of simultaneously talking to 50 of one’s forever best friends, who are not actually present? Are teenagers likely tomisinterpret the nature of these best-friendships? As Mr. Abramson, a 17-year-old who has “studied the societalimplications of the Internet” since age 10, puts it: “There’s the issue of removal. Online engagement is not a viablesubstitute for a functional in-person social life.”And then comes the somewhat hysterical litany of issues: stalkers, cyberbullies, iPod-induced deafness, allegedattention deficit disorder and the fact that these children really don’t know anyone’s phone number. Nora Delighter, 14, a freshman at the Packer Collegiate Institute in Brooklyn, performs an exasperated eye roll,then, deadpan, says: “It’s not like we’re robot people who live in a fantasy world. Everyone, even us, has to leavetheir room. Because we go to school. Where we talk to other humans and get a sense of what they’re really like.”To ask average 14- or even 20-year-olds about the nature of their online lives is to invite such sardonic comebacks,as if to confirm the emergence of an allnew generation gap, with most 40-pluses earnestly but hopelessly stuck onthe far side.“For these kids, I.M. is unquestionably their primary mode of social interaction,” says Dr. Sandra L. Calvert,chairwoman of the psychology department at Georgetown University and director of the Children’s Digital Media
 
Center. “Adults have to remember that this is how they communicate and that it’s thoroughly embedded. It’s like usand the telephone: blasé.”One intense parental issue — one suggesting a potential canyon as opposed to a gap — concerns what adults callrabid multitasking and children call normal life. In a recent study by the Kaiser Family Foundation, 2,000 8- to 18-year-olds from across the nation answered questionnaires and kept media diaries. The study showed that, across theage spread, children spent an average of six-and-a-half leisure hours a day switching among computers, TV’s,movies, video games, books, iPods, cellphones and texting. Perhaps most significant, those 14 and older spentadditional hours on a social networking site, usually MySpace (crowded, wild, like a cyber spring break) or Facebook (graphically neater, mostly for students). These sites are like sprawling digital yearbooks, each pagecrammed with photos, text, videos and blogs. Only preapproved individuals (“friends”) are permitted to viewsomeone’s page and leave comments, as they might in a guest book. But it’s not instantaneously interactive.Instant messaging, the near synchronous backand- forth between computers, is still the fastest, most popular meansof communication. As AOL recently reported, 66 percent of Americans 13 to 21 now prefer it to e-mail.“Absolutely everyone, everywhere, I.M.’s,” says Julia Marani, 14, a freshman at Marymount School in Manhattan.“E-mail is slower, more the thing you’d use to write your parents or a teacher. I.M. is the Main Thing. Really, Idon’t see how you could avoid it, even if you wanted to. And it is addictive. You can mean to go on 15 minutes,look up and see it’s 3 a.m.”As parents drift off to the sound some quaintly call typing, their children are deep inside multiple conversationswith their “buddies,” pseudonymous pals listed vertically along one side of the screen. Pull a stealth P.O.S. (parentover shoulder) and you might catch a few screen alter egos — for instance, shebiscuit, kickflip10, latteladie,talkinghead88, Jesusraves, each with individualized sign-on sounds, audio cues reminiscent of the way eachcharacter in “Peter and the Wolf” is represented by its own instrument.But over-40’s are unlikely to follow the speedfreak scroll of conversation. And as those online would argue, theywould also miss the point — miss just what it means to keep up with all those friends, all at once.Beyond the mundane — homework help, gossip, plan making, “Please sign my petition!” — instant messaging“provides precisely what it is teens need most: constant affirmation, lots of attention and the desire to distinguishthemselves,” Mr. Abramson says. “We all know how impossible it is to get noticed in our society. It’s almost likeyou’ve got to graduate into life having a sponsor. So, think about it from, say, a middle-school perspective: to besuddenly talking to eight people at once — that’s a huge psychological boost!”Jessica Cohen, a sophomore at Bay Shore Senior High School on Long Island, sums up the exponential rewards:“You talk to everyone you know from school and camp and then their friends, and so you’re going beyond your core group to cross-pollinate and suddenly you are talking to, like, 200 people!”Most important, says Ms. Fox: “You can talk to them without the problem of facial expressions. This is great withnew girls who might judge your appearance. It also covers those gaps with boys. You can be so much bolder online,and I don’t have to worry about being so witty or unique. It’s controllable; you have time to craft an answer, evenif,” as she concedes, “that has a kind of questionable aspect, like you’re changing your personality and then whenyou see that person, uh, is it obvious you’ve been trying to impress them?”Ms. Cohen is quick to explain. “Of course you can be great in person. If we’re I.M.-ing with someone, then whenwe see them, the contact’s enhanced, not stilted. We’re stronger socially. It’s not like you’ve forgotten how to speak English; you’ve just spoken very carefully selected English.”While it’s about a decade too soon to know with certainty how these friendships will evolve, whether they will bestronger and longer lasting than earlier bonds, it’s not too soon to assess the immediate impact of the digitalconnection.The good news first: The I.M. culture has given shy students who might ordinarily have spent four miserable yearsquasi-mute a chance to develop connections with classmates once deemed unapproachable. If friendships do not
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...