Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
BREACH OF TRUST AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION (FEE SCHEDULE)

BREACH OF TRUST AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION (FEE SCHEDULE)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 822|Likes:
Published by in1or
Breach of Trust Affidavit of Obligation (Fee Schedule)

In the case of human bodies – ideas, labor, tissues, etc. – one can observe that the owners of these “commodities,” have exclusive prerogatives over the benefits that they can provide:
• They can derive income from them in the form of capture at transaction time.
• They can exclude others from using them.
• They can also grant similar advantages to selected others.

Therefore, until such time as a statute-enforcing police officer, magistrate, attorney, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent and other so-called public officers all employees actually legitimize their actions by proving their case in a court of law that a man or woman is guilty of an alleged crime, that man or woman has every Right to “keep the meter running,” so to speak, by putting these people on notice that they have liability pursuant to a Fee Schedule.

If the man or woman has put impersonating govt. on notice to the effect that a Fee Schedule is in place, and the people acting in their capacities as police, attorneys, etc., fail to challenge this notice within a specified time, then the man or woman is entitled to recovery of remedy for damages in spite of the outcome of any criminal proceeding that the public officers may initiate as a separate action.

Most fundamentally, these rights to own our bodies as “property” and to engage in voluntary exchange are also basic common-law rights, and the two basic principles of voluntary capitalism. These principles are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as intended by our Founding Fathers. The 5th Amendment states that no one may be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.

“Where rights as secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which will abrogate them.” Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966).

The spirit of voluntary capitalism was expressed in this famous Supreme Court case, which reads:

“The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1906).

Very few Americans (including lawyers) know that federal legislative and territorial jurisdiction is very limited. It is limited to the ten square miles of Washington District of Columbia, certain military bases where States have ceded jurisdiction, certain territories such as Puerto Rico and Guam, and certain Guano islands.

Therefore, as soon as a man or woman can show that a police officer, magistrate, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent, magistrate, etc., is working for the corporation d/b/a/ the Govt. of the U.S. incorporated in 1871, they have shown that those people do not have jurisdiction over the man or woman on the land in the various states of the union.

“It is axiomatic that the prosecution must always prove territorial jurisdiction over a crime in order to sustain a conviction therefor.” U.S. v. Benson, 495 F.2d, at 481 (5th Cir., 1974).
Breach of Trust Affidavit of Obligation (Fee Schedule)

In the case of human bodies – ideas, labor, tissues, etc. – one can observe that the owners of these “commodities,” have exclusive prerogatives over the benefits that they can provide:
• They can derive income from them in the form of capture at transaction time.
• They can exclude others from using them.
• They can also grant similar advantages to selected others.

Therefore, until such time as a statute-enforcing police officer, magistrate, attorney, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent and other so-called public officers all employees actually legitimize their actions by proving their case in a court of law that a man or woman is guilty of an alleged crime, that man or woman has every Right to “keep the meter running,” so to speak, by putting these people on notice that they have liability pursuant to a Fee Schedule.

If the man or woman has put impersonating govt. on notice to the effect that a Fee Schedule is in place, and the people acting in their capacities as police, attorneys, etc., fail to challenge this notice within a specified time, then the man or woman is entitled to recovery of remedy for damages in spite of the outcome of any criminal proceeding that the public officers may initiate as a separate action.

Most fundamentally, these rights to own our bodies as “property” and to engage in voluntary exchange are also basic common-law rights, and the two basic principles of voluntary capitalism. These principles are in accordance with the U.S. Constitution as intended by our Founding Fathers. The 5th Amendment states that no one may be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.

“Where rights as secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which will abrogate them.” Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966).

The spirit of voluntary capitalism was expressed in this famous Supreme Court case, which reads:

“The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1906).

Very few Americans (including lawyers) know that federal legislative and territorial jurisdiction is very limited. It is limited to the ten square miles of Washington District of Columbia, certain military bases where States have ceded jurisdiction, certain territories such as Puerto Rico and Guam, and certain Guano islands.

Therefore, as soon as a man or woman can show that a police officer, magistrate, judge, sheriff, real estate agent, other public officer or any other agent, magistrate, etc., is working for the corporation d/b/a/ the Govt. of the U.S. incorporated in 1871, they have shown that those people do not have jurisdiction over the man or woman on the land in the various states of the union.

“It is axiomatic that the prosecution must always prove territorial jurisdiction over a crime in order to sustain a conviction therefor.” U.S. v. Benson, 495 F.2d, at 481 (5th Cir., 1974).

More info:

Categories:Types, Presentations
Published by: in1or on Mar 02, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/26/2014

pdf

text

original

 
International Registered Mail Number:
BREACH OF TRUSTAFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION (FEE SCHEDULE)Remedy; Trustee(s), agent(s) Fee Schedule and Invoice (Billing) Statement; including but not limited to this schedule:
 
(1) Trespass on Cestui Que Trust matter(s) and trust property, includingany trust property impaired as a result of any action taken without consent. 10,000 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars per trespass per person. (2) Trustee(s), agent(s) Correspondence not signed in affidavit form (under penalties of perjury, commercial liability). 10,000 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars per communication not in compliance. (3) Trustee(s), agent(s) Foreclosure, Repossession, Court Matters against Cestui Que Trust 10,000 in silver dollar coin convertible at thelegal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars. (4) Trustee(s), agent(s) Taking of any Cestui Que Trust property thru force, duress, coercion, conversion (including but not limited to arrest/kidnapping) 10,000 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legaland lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars per occurrence. (5) Self-Executing Lease Agreement (contract) created upon the taking thru force, duress, coercion, conversion of any Cestui Que Trust property 10,000 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars lease/per day out of possession of beneficiary. (6) Trustee(s), agent(s) Harassment after notice $10,000 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars per occurrence. (7) Trustee(s), agent(s) Violation(s); Breach of Close, Breach of Trust,Breach of Contract, Breach of the Peace, Perjury) of oath(s)/oath(s) of office of Trustee(s) False Swearing and acting “Without Authority.” 10,000 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars per person per violation. (8) Trustee(s), agents False Statements 10,000 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars per person, per false statement.(9) Trustee(s), agent(s) Impairment of Contracts 10,000 in silver dollarcoin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars user fee, per person, per impairment.
1
 
International Registered Mail Number:
(10) Trustee(s), agent(s) Violation of any un-a-lien-able rights including but not limited to all rights protected by Trusts, Trust Law, Law, Common-Law, International Law, Constitutions, Law of Nations, etc. 10,000 in silver dollar coin convertible at the legal and lawful ratio prescribed by law of 24: 1 of Federal reserve notes to silver dollars user fee, per violation, per person. NOTARY or NOTARY PUBLIC defined: An officer appointed by the executive, or other appointing power, under the laws of different states. 2. Their duties are generally prescribed by such laws. The most usual of which are, l. To attest deeds, agreements and other instruments, in order to give them authenticity. 2. To protest notes, bills of exchange, and the like. 3. To certify copies of agreements and other instruments. 3. By act of congress, Sept. 16, 1850, Minot's Statutes at Large. U. S. 458, it is enacted, That, in all cases in which, under the laws of the UnitedStates, oaths, or affirmations, or acknowledgments may now be taken or made before any justice or justices of the peace of any state or territory, such oaths, affirmations, or acknowledgments may be hereafteralso taken or made by or before any notary public duly appointed in any state or territory, and, when certified under, the hand and official seal of such notary, shall have the same force and effect as if taken ormade by or before such justice or justices of the peace. And all laws and parts of laws for punishing perjury, or subornation of perjury, committed in any such oaths or affirmations, when taken or made before any such justice of the peace, shall apply to any such offence committedin any oaths or affirmations which may be taken under this act before a notary public, or commissioner, as hereinafter named: Provided always, That on any trial for either of these offences, the seal and signature of the notary shall not be deemed sufficient in themselves to establish the official character of such notary, but the same shall be shown by other and proper evidence. 4. Notaries, are of very ancient origin they were well known among the Romans, and exist in every state of Europe, and particularly on the continent. 5. Their acts have long been respected by the custom of merchants and by the courts of all nations. 6Toull. n. 211, note. Vide, generally, Chit. Bills, Index, h. t.; Chit. Pr. Index,, h. t.; Burn's Eccl. Law, h. t.; Bro. Off. of a Not. passim; 2 Har. & John. 396; 7 Verm. 22; 8 Wheat. 326; 6 S. & R. 484; 1 Mis. R. 434. By act of Aug. 15, 1876, c. 304, notaries are authorized to take depositions and do all other acts in relation to taking testimony to be used in the courts of the United States, and to take acknowledgments andaffidavits with the same effect as commissioners of the United States circuit courts may do. R. S. §1778. They may protest national bank circulating notes; R. S. §5226; take acknowledgment of assignment of claims upon the United States; id. §3477; and administer oaths of allegiance to persons prosecuting such claims; id. §3479. By act of June22, 1874, c. 390, notaries may take proof of debts against the estate ofa bankrupt. The acts of notaries are respected by the custom of merchants and the law of nations. Their protest of a bill is received asevidence in the courts of all civilized countries. A Law Dictionary Adapted To The Constitution And Laws Of The United States Of America AndOf The Several States Of The American Union by: John Bouvier Revised Sixth Edition, 1856
2
 
International Registered Mail Number:
Sui Juris, known as: John, of the genealogy of Doe, freeborn spiritual being on the land state the facts contained herein are true, correct, complete, and not misleading, to the best of my personal first hand knowledge and belief. Being of sound mind, competent, over the age of 18. This my free will, voluntary act and deed to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver under my hand and seal with explicit reservationof all my unalienable rights and my specific common law right not to be bound by any contract or obligation which I have not entered into knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion, whereby I did not sign nor consent. I am not now nor have ever been a CITIZEN nor a U.S. Citizen nor a Fourteenth Amendment Federal Citizen nor Employee, I am not bound by sworn oath or oath of office. Whereas I hereby disclaim Clauses One and Two of SectionOne to the Fourteenth Amendment, together with Article Four Section Three Clause Two. I do hereby certify, verify, state, claim and declare forever without abandonment; Real Property (on Earth); Personal Property(body); and Ecclesiastical Property (soul) together with all trusts, probate, rights, titles, interests droit, droit both absolute and contingent, “Without the U.S.” Should this not be true then let the record be corrected or it will stand as truth. Time is of the essence. Veracity; In my Private Capacity as General Executor/Eecutrix of said Cestui Que Trust account Droit, Droit, This serves Notice that your offer has been Accepted as Valuable Consideration and Returned for Value. This property is Exempt from Levy. Please Adjust this Account forthe Proceeds, Products, Accounts and Fixtures and Release The Order(s) of The Court to Me Immediately. Make adjustment and close this account immediately, with prejudice. I accept your Oath, Oath of Office SecurityAgreement, Constitutions as by-laws, and Malfeasance Bond and place you in the Private commencing this self-executing binding contract between you and I. Further, I appoint you trustee “Fully Personally Liable Now” on your honor and solemn Oath to perform your obligations and duties to Protect My un-a-lien-able Rights in your Fiduciary Capacity against any and all claims, legal actions, orders, warrants, judgments, demands, liabilities, losses, foreclosure, depositions, summonses, lawsuits, costs, fines, liens, levies, penalties, taxes, damages, interests, and expenses whatsoever, both absolute and contingent, as aredue and as might become due, now existing and as might hereafter arise, and as might be suffered by, imposed on, and incurred by Debtor
 
for any and every reason, purpose, and cause whatsoever. Please honor Obligationof Good Faith in Performance of your Duties. Quid Pro Quos, an equal exchange or substitution.This my free will, voluntary act and deed true and lawful attorney-in-fact to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver under my hand and seal, explicitly reserving all rights without prejudice; By:__________________________________________ 
Sui Juris known as; John of the genealogy of Doe Bailor for JOHN DOE Bailee
 ___________________________________________ 
Probatio plena; Ran, Roe Third Party Witness"Sealed and delivered in the presence of us."
3

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
charlesr42 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->