You are on page 1of 83

The University of Kansas

Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory


ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

Increasing Allowable UAV Gross Weight and Expanding Operating Conditions via SolutionCell Pressure Adaptive Honeycomb
by

unclassified Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

Ron Barrett
The University of Kansas, Lawrence Aerospace Engineering Department and

Sean Paul Boike


President American Industrial Consultants

Boeing Phantom Works 26 February 2014

Unclassified

distribution unlimited

R. Barrett

All Rights Reserved

rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

Outline
1. Introduction & Motivation 2. Biological Models for Advanced Adaptive Actuators 3. PAH Materials Development 4. PAH Wing Applications 5. Operational Envelope, Allowable Weight & Performance Implications 6. LO Implications
1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

Motivation: The same as nature


T/O & Landing: Maximize CLmax, Reject Gust Loading Cruise: Maximize L/D

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Cruise: T/O & Landing: Supercritical/NLF Airfoil Section High Camber & t/c Wing Area, Camber & t/c Reduction Blunt Leading Edge Increased Sweep Angle Low Wing Sweep 1.Introduction Actuators 3.Art.Muscles 4.Aerospace 5.Automotive Unclassified 2.Nat. distribution unlimited R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

Successful Applications of Biomimicking Adaptive Materials In the Aerospace Industry:


Weapon Systems

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Piezoelectric, Shape-Memory-Alloys, Electroluminiscent Materials...

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota

Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory College of Biological Sciences Successful Applications of Biomimicking Adaptive Materials In the Aerospace Industry:

UAVs & Hovering Missiles

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Actuators 3.Art.Muscles 4.Aerospace 5.Automotive Unclassified 2.Nat. distribution unlimited R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota

Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory College of Biological Sciences Successful Applications of Biomimicking Adaptive Materials In the Aerospace Industry:

Disappearing UAVs

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Actuators 3.Art.Muscles 4.Aerospace 5.Automotive Unclassified 2.Nat. distribution unlimited R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

Aerospace Morphing Concepts (cont.)


Planform Morphing
www.nextgenaeronautics.com 2008

Section Morphing
Gould et al. 1981

unclassified

M i s s iA on dapt i W ve i ng

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

1980s: Mission Adaptive Wing

www.geocities.com 2008

Pendelton et al. 1981

University of Florida

1990s: NASAs AAW Lockheed Martin

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

Adaptive Materials & Structures


Shape Memory Alloys Piezoelectric Materials

unclassified

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

Air Muscles

McMurtry 2004

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

Conventional Adaptive Materials


Current range of actuator materials available
Can they be used in commercial aircraft as a class? ...or in primary structure?

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

10

What Would an Aircraft Designer want if s/he could design an adaptive material???
An "Ideal" Adaptive Aeromaterial/Aerostructure:
Material capable of "huge" (>50+%?) strains Fully proportional, easily controlled Stiff & strong enough to handle "real" loads Lighter than conventional aircraft actuation systems

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Faster than conventional aircraft actuation systems


Less costly & lower drag than conventional aircraft actuation systems No dedicated power consumption Self-diagnostic, self-repair capability Certifiable under FAR 23/25, 27/29 1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

11

Solution? ...Biomimetics

unclassified

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

"You should pay attention to what Mother Nature has done because she's got a 4.2 billion year lead in research and development.
-Prof. H.W. Smith, PE, Ph.D.

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

12

Fast-Response Actuators in Eukaryotes


Animal Muscle Cells and Tissues

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Fast-Acting Plant Cells and Tissues

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

13

Fast-Response Actuators in Eukaryotes


Animal Muscle Cell & Tissues

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

14

Fast-Response Actuators in Eukaryotes


Mechanical Analogs of Animal Muscle Tissues: -Shape-Memory-Alloys -Pneumatic Tubes -Piezoelectric Polymers -Adaptive Gels -Electrostatic Actuators

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


ITAR /EAR unrestricted

Solution: Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory College of Biological Sciences Actuators Made from 100% FAA-Certifiable materials, but arranged like fast-acting plant cells

The University of Minnesota

15

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Actuators 3.Art.Muscles 4.Aerospace 5.Automotive Video Credit: 2.Nat. & C.M. Barrett Unclassified distribution unlimited R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

16

Solution: FAA-Certifiable Actuators based on Plant Cell Structures

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Albizia julibrissin

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

17

Solution: FAA-Certifiable Actuators based on Plant Cell Structures

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Pulvinus

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

18

Solution: FAA-Certifiable Actuators based on Plant Cell Structures

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Ground Cells

Phloem
Xylem

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


ITAR /EAR unrestricted

Solution: Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory College of Biological Sciences Actuators Made from 100% FAA-Certifiable Materials, but arranged like fast-acting plant cells

The University of Minnesota

19

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Actuators 3.Art.Muscles 4.Aerospace 5.Automotive Video Credit: 2.Nat. & C.M. Barrett Unclassified distribution unlimited R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

ITAR /EAR unrestricted

Solution: Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory College of Biological Sciences FAA-Certifiable Actuators based on Plant Cell Structures

The University of Kansas

The University of Minnesota

20

1.Introduction Actuators 3.Art.Muscles 4.Aerospace 5.Automotive Unclassified 2.Nat. distribution unlimited R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

21

Solution: FAA-Certifiable Actuators based on Plant Cell Structures


Fundamental Structural Arrangement:

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

unclassified

ITAR /EAR unrestricted

Biomimetic Honeycomb Based on Plant Actuator Cells


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory College of Biological Sciences

The University of Kansas

The University of Minnesota

22

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

Easily modeled, light, strong

Made of conventional materials (aluminum, steel, aramids)


Already known and accepted by certifying agencies like the FAA
Unclassified distribution unlimited R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

23

Biomimetic Plant-Cell Based Honeycomb Actuator

unclassified Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

After: Olympio et al. 2007

Standard

Auxetic

Hybrid

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

24

Pressure Adaptive Honeycomb (PAH) Breakdown for Modeling

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

25

PAH Geo-Kinematic Properties

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

CDP = Cell Differential Pressure

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

26

PAH Cell Modeling

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

27

PAH Cell Modeling

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

28

PAH Linear-Elastic Modeling Background


Cellular Material Theory (CMT) after Gibson et al. 1988 Considerations: l Only valid for small thickness-to-length ratio t qi Only valid for +/- 20% of strain Linear stress-strain relationship

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

29

PAH Linear-Elastic Modeling Background

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

30

PAH Theoretical Characterization


Global stress-strain relations: @ constant pressure:

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

@ constant mass:

with

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

31

PAH Theory, Experiment & Correlation

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

32

PAH Nonlinear Mechanics

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

33

PAH Single-Cell Tension-Compression Test

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

34

PAH Longitudinal Stress-Strain Correlation

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

p = 55kPa

p = 60kPa

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

35

PAH Single-Cell Tension-Compression Test

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

36

PAH Four-Cell Tensile Test of Steel Honeycombs

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

37

PAH Four-Cell Tensile Test of Steel PAH

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

38

Experimental PAH Stress-Strain Relations

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

39

PAH Multi-Cell Compression Test

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

40

Non-linear Mechanics of PAH Structures

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

41

Effects of Different PAH Boundary Conditions

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

42

Multi-Cell Compression Test

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

180mm

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

43

PAH Bender Experimental Characterization


Validation Experiment: Three-point bend test

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

FEM Modeling:

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

44

Comparison to Other Adaptive Materials and Actuators


Conventional Hydraulic Actuators

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

High Pressure Adaptive Honeycomb

Atmospherically Triggered Adaptive Honeycombs

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota A New Approach to Flight Control... Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory College of Biological Sciences Based on Nature: The University of Kansas

45

PAH employs distributed, rather than concentrated actuation...

1.Introduction Actuators 3.Art.Muscles 4.Aerospace 5.Automotive Unclassified 2.Nat. distribution unlimited R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

46

Distributed airloads

Current Aircraft Actuator Design Philosophy

Control surface loads concentrated at finite hard points


Loads transferred through actuators & tracks

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Loads redistributed into primary structure

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

47

PAH Actuator Design Philosophy

unclassified Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

Control surface loads stayed distributed Distributed control surface loads passed thru distributed actuators Distributed loads transferred to primary strucure
1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

48

Comparison of PAH to Adaptive Materials and FAA Certified Actuators


High Pressure Adaptive Honeycomb

unclassified

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

Conventional Hydraulics & Pneumatics

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

49

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Unclassified

distribution unlimited

R. Barrett

All Rights Reserved

rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

50

Pressure Adaptive Wing Section

2013 all rights reserved and C.M. al. 2007 Copyright R.M. Murray et Barrett

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

51

Pressure-Adaptive Flap in Wind Tunnel (cont.)

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

0kPa CDP

40kPa CDP

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

52

PAH Wing Section: Controllable Aerocompliance


Balanced Stiffness Cell Differential Pressure (BCDP) = 39 psi
Commanded TE Deflection 8 4 0 -4 -8

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

53

PAH Wing Section: Controllable Aerocompliance


UnBalanced Stiffness Cell Differential Pressure (UCDP) =
Commanded TE Deflection = 0 20psi 39psi 30psi

unclassified

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

10psi

0 psi

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

54

PAH Wing Section... foundations


Aerocompliance Background
Quasi-Rigid Airfoils 1800's Quasi-Rigid Flap Systems 1920's Aerocompliant Devices: HP-Slats, Blow-down tabs etc. Dynamically Aerocompliant Wings 1990's

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

a(t)
q(t)

a(t)
q(t)

CL a CL=(a)

CL a CL=(a, df)

CL a CL=(q, a, df)

CL a CL(t)=(q(t),a(t), Ew)

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

55

PAH Wing Section: Controllable Aerocompliance


New... Adaptive Aerocompliance & Commanded Lift Flight
"Practical" aggregate shape bounds due to physical limits to aerocompliant dynamic reshaping

unclassified

"Ideal" Adaptive Aerocompliant, Commanded-Lift-Flight Aircraft

"Practical" Minimum Aggregate slope due to Aircraft CLa, CL(q) Lift Characteristics

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

Lc

Lc

L
Lc

a(t)
Lc

a(t)
Lc

a(t)
Lc

q(t)

q(t)

q(t)

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

56

PAH Wing Section: Controllable Aerocompliance


Conventional: Adaptive Aerocompliant:

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

57

PAH Wing Section: Controllable Aerocompliance


Conventional CL-a curve: Adaptive Aerocompliant:

unclassified

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

L(t) = 2000l b

Design point: 10,000lb of lift:

L(t) = 0

Design point: 10,000lb of lift:

a(t) = 2

a(t) = 2

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

58

Aerocompliance: Key to Birds Wings and PAH

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Gust load relieving smoothes flight


Unclassified distribution unlimited R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

59

PAH Wing Section: Controllable Aerocompliance


Aeromechanics Modeling Controllable K d do Cd

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

do

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

60

Current Aircraft Technology in Gust Fields

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

61

PAH Wings: Enhancing Ride Quality, Fatigue Properties & Flight Safety via Active Aerocompliance

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

62

PAH Gurney Flaps & Winglets

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

63

The Real Savings... from Class I Design Forward


Structure of a typical FAR-25 V-n Diagram

Commercial Aircraft Structural Weights are set by these points

unclassified

Gust Limits Maneuver Limits

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

Load Factor, n (g's)

+1 0 VS1 VA VC VD

-1

Flight Speed, Vflt (kts)


Gust Limits

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

64

Weight Saving Paradigm Shift:


Compression of Gust Lines to within Maneuver ...just like birds do, via dynamic aerocompliance

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Load Factor, n (g's)

+1 0 VS1 VA VC VD

-1

Flight Speed, Vflt (kts)

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

65

Weight Saving Paradigm Shift:


Compression of Gust Lines to within Maneuver ...just like birds do, via dynamic aerocompliance

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

saving... 7 23% total aircraft structural weight!

Load Factor, n (g's)

+1 0 VS1 VA VC VD

-1

Flight Speed, Vflt (kts)

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

66

Weight Saving Paradigm Shift:


Large UAV Sea Level V-n Diagram

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

67

Turbulence Intensity PAH Opens Airspace


Example 1/22/99 FL 531 to 605, 18:00Z

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

68

Turbulence Intensity PAH Opens Airspace

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

69

Reference: Boeing 787


$32B investment in new product RDT&E: Just over half of the RDT&E was devoted to new materials & manufacturing
to achieve a ~20% weight reduction WRT conventional materials

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

70

PAH Implications for GA UAVs


Implications for Predator/Avenger Lines: Increase in allowable gross weight by: Peak - Maneuver g's Increase in operational range by: Sp.Range * (Pk Man. g's)

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Increase in operational flight conditions by: above Airframe life extension

LO Decrement

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

71

LO Aircraft Door Applications


Hinges, push-rods, locking mechanisms, latches boost open-door RCS

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

PAH door actuators and locking Mechanisms can be made from RAM cellular structure, dropping open door RCS

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

72

Related Technology: LO Vortex Generators


Vortex Generator Relative Performance
Tri-Rib
Tapered Tetrahedral Wishbone Ramp Tapered Vane

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Rectangular Vane
Triangular Plow Scoop Shielded Plow Simple Plow

Dome
0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Boundary Layer Energization/Drag Increment


(Optimum Size & Spacing)

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

73

Related Technology: LO Vortex Generators


"Smart" VGs up when needed, stowed flush when not needed
Installation fabrication & operation very similar to de-icer boots Fail-safe two modes: i. Semiactive atmospheric deployment ii. Active systemic optimization Easy integration/no primary structure penetration New materials technologies used certifiable under even FAR-25, but unique to the Aerospace community Proven VG Configuration Cessna 208, S2R, UV-23
US & International Patents Pending under Boeing, KU, Ikhana & DARCorp.

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

74

Related Technology: LO Vortex Generators


1. Inboard LE TTVG Retrofit: Passive Only, RCS Reduction Passive TTVG's: 30% lower drag Active STVG's: 100% lower drag

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

2. Crossflow Upper Surface Retrofit Fully Active, Semiactive or Passive RCS & Drag Reduction 3. Cmde Upper and Lower Surface Retrofit Fully Active, Semi-Active or Passive for RCS & Drag Reduction 1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

75

Related Technology: LO Vortex Generators


Upper Wing lobes ~150m2 RCS Increment

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

76

Related Technology: LO Vortex Generators


Avenger Applications... PAH empennage: stabilization

unclassified

LO VG's:
boattail & interference drag cleanup

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

PAH flight control surfaces for LO

Useful load increase


Reduction in operational limitations LO PAH weapon bay door actuators

1.Introduction Models 4.Wing 5. Performance 6. LO Unclassified 2.Bio. distribution unlimited 3. Materials R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

77

Acknowledgements

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Prof. Roelof Vos

NASA Ames Research Center

1.Introduction Actuators 3.Art.Muscles 4.Aerospace 5. Impact Unclassified 2.Nat. distribution unlimited R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

78

Questions?

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Unclassified

distribution unlimited

R. Barrett

All Rights Reserved

rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

79

PAH Flap and Winglet System Implications


Implications for commercial jet fleets:

unclassified

Korean Air:

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

KRW11.807 trillion 2011 in operating expenses Retrofit Impacts: ~ +KRW200B (Net loss in 2011: KRW98B)

New Equipment Impacts: +KRW850B DOC savings + +KRW220B Airframe Life Extension + +KRW660B increased cargo carriage revenue ~ KRW1.7 trillion

European Patent EP 2459442 A2 US Patent 8,366,057 B2 February 2013

1.Introduction Actuators 3.Art.Muscles 4.Aerospace 5. Impact Unclassified 2.Nat. distribution unlimited R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

80

Aerospace Seating Applications


Rotary SolutionCell Seat Reclination Actuator
(20% conventional actuator weight) vertical seatback actuator geometry

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

100psi CDP cells

Torlon-Aramid PAH substrate

100psi CDP cells

reclined seatback actuator geometry

1.Introduction Actuators 3.Art.Muscles 4.Aerospace 5. Impact Unclassified 2.Nat. distribution unlimited R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

81

Aerospace Seating Applications


ultra-low weight, compliant headrest actuators PAH Actuators ~20% of the weight of electromagnetic servoactuators

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

conventional reclination actuators


ultra-low weight, conformal lumbar spine and sacral seat actuators conventional reclination actuators PAH Actuators with 10:1 extension capability conventional electromagnetic seat elevation, tilt actuators conventional electromagnetic jackscrew footrest actuators
R. Barrett All Rights Reserved rev. 28 February 2010

Unclassified

distribution unlimited

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

82

Aerospace Seating Applications


I.Business & First Class seats have between 2 and 14 actuators of different stroke and force capability. II.Replacement will yield a weight saving of between 1 and 16lb per seat
@ $750-$1,500/lb 787LCCsavings = $425-$850k

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

III. Honeycomb used for crash energy absorption easily satisfies FAR 25.562

Unclassified

distribution unlimited

R. Barrett

All Rights Reserved

rev. 28 February 2010

The University of Kansas


Adaptive Aerostructures Laboratory
ITAR /EAR unrestricted

The University of Minnesota


College of Biological Sciences

83

High Lift Mechanisms:


Conventional Actuators in new (22 year old) Conventional Adaptive Wing Concept:
Conventional actuators = heavy Not adaptively aerocompliant = minimal to adverse gust load alleviation optimization Not capable of negative section lift-curve slope generation No advantage in V-n diagram gust peak alleviation No ride quality improvement, aeromechanics enhancement and fatigue load alleviation Load concentration drives weight, increases complexity, cost Zone 1 lightning strike untested

Copyright R.M. and C.M. Barrett 2013 all rights reserved

unclassified

Unclassified

distribution unlimited

R. Barrett

All Rights Reserved

rev. 28 February 2010

You might also like