Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Monday Coleman Levels of LIt-SES

Monday Coleman Levels of LIt-SES

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1 |Likes:
Published by Patrick Finn

More info:

Published by: Patrick Finn on Mar 03, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Monday Coleman levels of lit
ARE NOT MAKING DECISIONS FOR OUR SCHOOLS EDUCATION/CORPORATION MOGULS ARE PATRICK J. FINN David Coleman, a lead author of the Common Core English Language Arts Standards entered the lucrative Education/Corporation Complex while an employee of McKinsey and Company which serves as an adviser to businesses, governments, and institutions around the world and which the  New York Times  referred to as the "most prestigious consulting firm of all." (In Washington D. C. these consulting firms
circle the capital on the I 495 Beltway are referred to as “Beltway Bandits.)
Coleman is now president of the college board probably earning over $1 million dollars a year. He has been quoted as saying that students in
our nation’s public schools
 need to understand that
“No one gives a shit” what they think.
 This is so naive, so ill informed, so maddening, and so
revealing of the power elite’s a
ttitude toward working-class students and teachers in working-class schools. It is reflective of the education policy being driven by President Obama, Arne Duncan, and David Coleman, all products of elite schools who do not have  between them a course in education, socio-linguistics, the sociology of education, or simply the much maligned reading and language arts methods courses taught in every teacher preparation program. Truth to tell, I am an enormous supporter of President Obama, and I have some respect for Secretary Duncan who has a good record as a social justice activist from his elementary and high school days at the University of Chicago Laboratory School (his father was a psychology professor at the university), but I find no evidence that he ever set foot in the University of Chicago Education Department, which is in the same building as the Lab School.
Coleman’s remark 
“No one gives a shit….” is
 so maddening because it ignores, more likely is ignorant of, the concepts of economic reproduction, levels of literacy, and how levels of literacy are related to social class. James Gee  proposed that essay-text literacy is the highest level of literacy. It can be traced back to the 17th century when the British essayists devised ways to exploit writing for the purpose of formulating original knowledge. For a writer essay-text literacy is the ability to make an explicit assertion (topic sentence) to examine it, ferreted out the assumptions upon which it is based, and state them explicitly. Through this process inconsistent assumptions and implications are confronted and resolved and original conclusions are drawn. New knowledge is therefore created. For a reader essay-text literacy the ability to comprehend, evaluate, analyze, and synthesize what is read. When essay-text literacy is used by people who are conscious of their own power and self interest
and who use literacy to understand, influence, and control what’s going on around them, essay
-text literacy  becomes
 powerful literacy
the literacy of actors, doers, leaders, movers, and shakers. Powerful literacy seems natural to people who are raised in affluent professional or executive elite homes. When it is used in
Monday Coleman levels of lit
working-class or to some extent middle-class classrooms to critique and challenge the status quo, it is called
critical literacy
. Essay-text literacy and powerful literacy are associated with affluent professional and executive elite communities and is demanded by most affluent professional and executive elite occupations. It is the level of literacy that gets most teaching attention in affluent professional and executive elite schools. It is, no doubt, the literacy that was demanded of David Coleman in his affluent, highbrow home, his schools, and his community.
 Informational literacy
 is the ability to read and absorb the kind of high-status knowledge that is associated with school textbooks and to write examinations and reports based on this knowledge.
It is associated with middle-class communities and is demanded by most middle-class occupations where one is expected to know the answers or know where to find the answers. It is the level of literacy that gets most teaching attention in middle-class schools. I think this is the literacy Coleman was thinking of when said students need to learn that no one gives a shit what they think.
 Functional literacy
 is the ability to meet the reading and writing demands of an average person on an average day
USA Today
 and writing a personal letter or a note to leave on the kitchen table. It is associated with the kinds of employment in which working-class adults typically engage. This level of literacy is associated with working-class communities and is demanded by most working-class occupations. It is the level of literacy that gets most teaching attention in working-class schools. Here again, presumable no one gives a shit what the students think. Curriculum guides and standards (including Common Core State Standards) appear to indicate that all teachers, including teachers of working-class and middle-class students are supposed to teach essay-text literacy. In fact teachers of working-class and middle-class students they do try to teach essay-text literacy, and they are successful to varying degrees
the more poverty-stricken the
students’ families the less
, the more economically secure the students’ families, the more success
ful. And so they do ask students what they think and what they feel about the texts they are assigned to read and Coleman describes this as bullshit.
 The previous discussion draws heavily on the theory of economic reproduction, that is, American schools prepare working-class students to become working-class adults, middle-class students to become middle-class adults, and so on. This is from Bowles and Gintis
s aptly titled book
Schooling in Capitalist  America: Educational Reform and Contradictions of Economic Life.
 I cannot believe that Arne Duncan with a degree in sociology from Harvard and a senior thesis entitle
The Values, Aspirations and Opportunities of the Urban Underclass
 has not read this enormously influential book. How could he not see that economic reproduction is relevant to the discussion of standards?

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->