Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Abdullah A. Tunis, A087 335 805 (BIA Feb. 20, 2014)

Abdullah A. Tunis, A087 335 805 (BIA Feb. 20, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 190|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record upon finding the immigration judge failed to adequately address the respondent's claim of eligibility for Temporary Protected Status (TPS). The Board required the Department of Homeland Security on remand to submit the administrative record maintained by USCIS regarding respondent's prior TPS applications. The decision was written by Member Elise Manuel.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record upon finding the immigration judge failed to adequately address the respondent's claim of eligibility for Temporary Protected Status (TPS). The Board required the Department of Homeland Security on remand to submit the administrative record maintained by USCIS regarding respondent's prior TPS applications. The decision was written by Member Elise Manuel.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Mar 04, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/11/2014

pdf

text

original

 
 Na: TUNS ABULAH A
U. pm  J
Executive Ofce r Imigraon Review
r f Igrtn App Oc f th Crk
507 leesburg Pike, Site 2000 Fas Cch Vginia 0530
OHS/ICE ce of Chief Counsel BAL 31 Hopkins Plaza, Room 1600 Bltimore, MD 20  A 087-335-805 Date of ths noice 2/20/2014
nclsed s a copy of the Boar's deciso and rer in te above-rerece case. ncosre
P b: Ml, Eli
Sincerely,
D
c
Doa Carr Ce lerk
yungc  Dk
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Abdullah A. Tunis, A087 335 805 (BIA Feb. 20, 2014)
 
S Dpamn
f
Ju
Exepuve Oce
r
Imaton Review Fas Chh, Vrga
20530
Fle 087 335 805 Bore
I
re D LAH A. NS  MOV PROCEEDGS PP ON BHAF O SPONT  Pr se ON BEA OF DHS: CGE: Verca N Pv  Asis Cef Cuse
Decson of e Bod o an Aeals
Dae:
�FEB
2 0
2014
Noce Se  22( 7)()( &N t [8 SC§ 8( a)( ) A] t -o vad  vsa o e doce  APPLCATON eor Proeced Sas The resode a ave  ze of Lbea as ed  apea o te ao Jge's decso daed Ma 8 202 orerig e resodes roval o he ied Saes e resode has led  aeal ref
 esose he Deet of Hoe e DS) as ove r s
 afe We l rem he case o e grao udge r er roceedgs e reie ao udges' igs of  r ce eo b quesos of a sceo  jude d a ohe ssues  apeas e ovo
8
CF § 03l{ 3) e resode ges o apea a e ao ges g of reovab as eoeos bease he ao ge ae the e of ovg eova o
h
 aer  o he DS d base her dg soe o he oes of a o 213 Record of Deorable/admsse e dese hs oeos e resoet aso ges a he ao ge sho ave iree e DS o le a co of s asave ecord
orer to ascer eer he 
fc
 as prevous ged eor Proeced Sas ()
See
 Resoets e Bef
1
 esoe's Noce of e We af e oo of he ao dges eso g ha he DHS e s  brd o esabl e espoe's reovabl b e d covcg evidee (J a 2
ee
8
CFR § 20
 see also iloms
v.
Tod,
 26 .S 9 193) e e o esae  e resoes aelae rges eag o hs oro of e aio udges eso. Frs he eor sos ha he ao uge coec pace he burde
We have o ae eeces o sec ages of e resoet's apea bef becase s ages ere o mee
= h
Cite as: Abdullah A. Tunis, A087 335 805 (BIA Feb. 20, 2014)
 
 A87 335 805 of estlishing emovability on e S. Second, the Imiaton Judges eice on e foaion conained n e espondens Fo I213 to detmine whee e DS met is  bden of oof to establish e resondents emovability was apprprate, aset y caons a tha  contned y ormaion a was incoec or was obtned by coercion, dess, or imprpe acion.
See Matter of Ponce-Hendez
2 I&N ec 784 785 BA 1999);
Mtter o Barcenas
19 I&N ec 09 611 A 1988)
Mtter o Garci
17 I&N ec 319 321 BA 1980) Third, e miaon Judge dd not base her ndig of emovabty solely on he conens of e o -23 bu aso on e exaton rovded by the esponden" I.J. a 2) Specically, the respondent acowledged (1) at he was poled no e Uned States in 1997 d (2) tha his oe was evenally teinaed
A
suc, e resondent is emovable om e Uied Staes ursut to secion 212a)(7)()()() of e mmiation d Natonality Ac, 8 U.SC § 182a)7)A)i)I) as an mmt not   possession of a valid uexpired i visa, reeny emi, border crossing idenicaon cd, or othe vali en document eed by e Ac e will remd hs case, owever, as he record of roceedigs does no demonsate at he miaon Jdge adequatey adessed he respondens cam tha he is elible r S d his appen efs to reew a pior TS applicaton bere e aion Jdge we in remov roceedngs On remd, the  aton Jdge should insuct the S o subt e adminisative record mainned by he United States Cizenshp d  aion Serices USCIS)
s case, cuding the respondens May 1 010 appcaion o eegister  TPS, he USCISs October 14, 010 decison denng at aplicaion, d y rio apicaons, or a ceicaio tha no such prior applicato appeed  e USCISs ecods.
See Matter o  HenriquezRivera
 25 I&N ec 575 IA 2011);
Matter o Figueroa
 25 I&N ec. 596 BA 01) he miaton Judge should e afrd e resonden  opporuni o renew hs TS application d should allow both paies to submit new, perinent evdece
See Mtter o Fgeroa, supr
ong at when  aplcaton  S s ded d is reewed
remova  proceedngs, miaion udge may consider y mateia d elevt evidce, egdless of whete e evdence was prevousy considered n proceeigs ere the USCIS). By ssuing hs remd we inimate no opinion as to he ultimate oucome of ths case  Accordingly, the llowing order shall be enered. O The case is remded o e Iaon Judge r e poceedngs conssent with e egog d  the ey of a new deciso.  At the heig, the responden aie a he was paroled into e Uned Saes 1997 d at hs aroe expire in 1999 r at 4-) O apeal, he agan cocedes that he w poled
1997 bt aeges a hs poe wa no teinaed un 2010
Cite as: Abdullah A. Tunis, A087 335 805 (BIA Feb. 20, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->