Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Edelma M. Montejo Trujillo, A094 329 654 (BIA Feb. 25, 2014)

Edelma M. Montejo Trujillo, A094 329 654 (BIA Feb. 25, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 9|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record because the immigration judge did not sufficiently address the arguments in the respondent's untimely motion to reopen alleging that she was prejudiced by ineffective assistance of counsel. The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland.
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record because the immigration judge did not sufficiently address the arguments in the respondent's untimely motion to reopen alleging that she was prejudiced by ineffective assistance of counsel. The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland.

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Mar 06, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/08/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Subhash Chandra
44
West Center Rd, Suite
4
Omaha, NE
6844 U Dpamn  Js
Executive Oce r Immgon Revew
B Iigi pp O  k
5 /07 Leesburg Pik Sute 000 Fals Church Vrgn 03
HS/ICE Oice of Chief Counsl -KAN
4
Grand Blvd., Suite

Kansas City, MO
648
Name: MNTEJ TRUJIL EDELMA M A
94964
Dat of his noice
//4
cosed  a copy of the Boad' deo and ode  e boe-eece ce. cosue
Pl Mb: Wdd Ld S
Sceely,
D
c
Donna Car e ek
' C
I
l N Z I;
 k
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
 
US
Department
of
Jusce
Excutive Oc
e
r
Iiaton Revew Decson ofhe Board ommga Appeal Fas
hch,
Vga
20530
File: A094 29 654 -Kansas Cty
MO
In re
DLM
M
MOTJO TRUJLLO  MOVAL ROCEDGS
 APPEAL
O HLF OF RSONDT
Sash Cara sqire
O BLF OF
OHS
C
H
 A
R
G
E
:
Jener A May  Asssant ie ounel ate oice ec. 212a)((A){i), &N c [
8 C  l 182()(6)()i)]
-
 Pree witou beng adited or proled
PICTO:
Motin o reoen
B
2
5
014
he esondet aeals e iaon Jdge' ril 1, 22, decso denyi er motion to reopen e record wil be reanded o he Imiraon dge r er roceeis conistet w is oon ad r enty o a new decisio This case wa onaly bee e mratio uge o ri

 2
0
6
,
e the reondet ws ted vount epaure Susequel, on ue 5, 207 e Bo reed he ecord o he Imiraion Cou to her acton, oing te resonden' hen cose ad waved aea dr te ceedigs n Apr 5, 202 e resondent le a motion o reopen t the gan Jde alegng se ws te ic of neectve assisace of coe duin her rio roceeigs and a er decio to ake vouta depure
ws
o oluay
On
 Ail
16
 202, e Iigaon Judge ened te resonden's moion o reopei a ere deciion In picul te mrio Jde ee e respode's moo as unely, nti atshe "wa receig lega avice o an atore aer her orinal aore o he coains abo. The iation e smaily cocuded ere s �o to js e resones] six year deay bere dec o e [the oto We n at he mron dge's decion deyi te respondents oon i suen

8
C.FR
§
(d(3(
03
( n
eve  cua e maton Jge  o pecicaly aess i
ny
en wy te resodets ca of ineective assstce of cousel o tat she di no an ouy dearre  e coneuent co proerly adicae the mer of
apeal o ta deco.  i reard  e iraion Jdge i no addres ay o e rereets set r in our decision n
M f 
9
&
Dec 63 A
988
n/or eer e respoet e her bue of oof er

  
o does the gration udes eco reec ay consdeao o e respode' agmet coceg her reasons r o eag of e llee eecive assisace o he s e i se ha coace
 ird aoey (c e cose er
¥Z .�
..
i
 M
........
 
A094 329 654 easons  ot conactig cue cosel sone, nd he easos   mag a clam ue
Lozada
ags he second aoey h se cosule We c o uphd he mga Jdge's decis eyng he esonens otio  eope as utimel whe he d not  enl adess o cosde e cla of ineecve ssstce of couse wch y excuse te uteness o the mot. Thus, we d a ema s wrted  he Igao ude to y cnsde d ajudcae the gumens ade n the espoden's oon to oen as we as he accomping moon  a change of veue, d  sse a ne decisin.
1
Accn he eco wl be emne o the Immiao dge  he ceeds cssten w s opo d  et o  ew ecson  OER: The ecd s eme o e Imgatiudge  he oceedngs csiset w his opio d  e o  ew ecsion
?lr °:t
ORTHEBO
Howeve, we nd  met  e esponens cten hat jusctio o judcae he moti  een esded n he Igao C n Ccag, Ilnos,  h Ksas C, Msso e ecod ictes hat lthugh  Immgation dge n Ccg pesded ove he  evous pceedgs b eeve ose poceedns wee ockeed i Ksas Cy ad te  pes ppeed  e mmgo Co hee. heee e mmgao Judge 
K
Cy ope aducated e espdet's m o eopen e g nsuctons t wch he espen ctes eae onl to he phscal ocain of he g Co wh amstve cool ov e ecod  oceedigs,   djcatio uho We ecogze ha the Une States C  Aels  e Sevet Cc s ss ss s  vee n poceedns cndce y elevdeo  ose decsions etemed te venue  a  eto  evew  he cou f pels e seco 242(b )(2) of e Act, 8 US.C§ 1252(b)(2 e  he uo o ece  oton  eope a te amnsave agc eve
 Se Cordova-Soto v. Hold
72 F.d 789 (7th C 2;
Ramos v Ashcro,
7
F.3d
98 (7h Ci 20 No has the esen esablse  edce w e o e apen connon hat te Immga udge's Ap 1 2012, eciso d n if he of he gh o appe, nasuch as se ed a mel appe o  decs
2

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->