Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Jose Toledo-Alvarado, A204 259 296 (BIA Feb. 26, 2014)

Jose Toledo-Alvarado, A204 259 296 (BIA Feb. 26, 2014)

Ratings:
(0)
|Views: 182|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record in light of evidence indicating that respondent’s sentence for attempted theft had been reduced to 364 days. The Board noted that while the respondent was still removable for being present without being admitted or paroled, the sentence reduction could affect his eligibility for relief, including voluntary departure. The decision was written by Member John Guendelsberger.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record in light of evidence indicating that respondent’s sentence for attempted theft had been reduced to 364 days. The Board noted that while the respondent was still removable for being present without being admitted or paroled, the sentence reduction could affect his eligibility for relief, including voluntary departure. The decision was written by Member John Guendelsberger.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Mar 10, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/30/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Seth  Reszko Esq Rea Aar
&
 Assocates, PC 3365 Peper ane, Sue 102 as Vegas, NV 89120-0000 Nae TOLO-AVARAO JOSE
   
Executive Oce r Immigration Review
Board of Immigration Apeals Oce of he Clerk
5107
leesburg Pike. Sute
2000
Fas Chch. Vgna
0530
HS/CE Oce o Ce Counsel -VG 3373 Peer ane as Vegas, NV 89120  A 204-259-296 ae o ths noce2 26/2014
Ecosd s a cpy of the Boad's dcisi ad order i the abve-rrence cas. Ecosure
P M Gd 
Sceel,
D
Dona Ca hif Cerk
   
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Jose Toledo-Alvarado, A204 259 296 (BIA Feb. 26, 2014)
 
TOLEDO-AVRDO, JOSE  A0-59-96 HNDERON DE. CNER 8 EAT BASI ROAD ENERSON, NV 8905 ame: TOLO-ALVARAO JOE
US   
Ec fc r rao R
Boar o Immgrao Appeals Oe o the erk
507
Leebg Pke, Se
000
Fa h Vga
0530
SCE Oice of Chif ounsl -VG 37 Pepper Lae as Vgas NV 890  A 20-59-96 Dat of his otic 60
ncos is a coy of  Boas cisio   aorrnc cas Tis co s bin ovi o yo s a cousy Yo ao o rsa as b sd  his cson rsua o
8
CFR § 1292(a)   aac ciso ors a o b ro o  Uni Sas or ams a iraon Juds dcisio orin a o b rod ay ion

r o  acd cisio us   i ad ci y  aora cour of aas in

as of  da o h dcisio Ecos
 M Gd 
Sincry
D
c
Don Carr Cif Cr
  k
Cite as: Jose Toledo-Alvarado, A204 259 296 (BIA Feb. 26, 2014)
 
 Dm  J
v 
 In
w D   B  
A Fl
C,
Vg 53
 Fie: A04 259 6 -L Veg, NV In re JOSE TODOAARADO I RMOAL PROCDGS APPA AND MOTO Date ON BHALF OF RSPODT Se L. Reszko, squire
FEB 2 6
2014
The respond a nave d cizen of Mexco, appeals e decson of e on Jude, ed ovber 4, 3 orden hs rova om he Ued ae He h so led a  moon o remd We w  the responden's moon o red Regess of hs mnal hsory he  responden is indendeny sujec to reoval o e Unted Ses bause he s len wo is presen n is coy wo eing ade or poed by a mmaion ofc or who arrved a y me or place oer h as desiaed y e Aoey Geeral
(1J.
at 12; Tr a 81; xh 1)
See
secon 1(a)(6)(A)() of he miation and aiony Ac, 8 U § 1182(a)(6)(A)(i)  Noeheess, he espoden has pesene evidence ha, while his appea ws pening bere is Board, te evada courts have redced he senence iposed upon h as  result of  hs onvcion r aempe he to 364 ays
ee Matter of Cot-Vargas,
23 & Dec 849 (2005) In lgh of is ne d aeria evdece e il remd e recor o e Immation ge o er eve e chge ofemovailiy de secion (a)(2)(A)(i)() of he Ac d provie he responden wi a reewed opponiy o eqest reief o reov, ncludng voun depre Accorngy, e llong orer is entered ORDR The rspondes moion o remnd s aned ad e record is rnd o e Immiaon ou r er proceegs onsiset wh e regoig opion ad he eny of a new deson
Cite as: Jose Toledo-Alvarado, A204 259 296 (BIA Feb. 26, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->