is because there were strict dietary laws which were gradually eroded asChristianity absorbed more and more customs from the varied tribes of peoplewho took Christianity as their religion. Why? Because we can see the first stagesof the rearguard action to defend these dietary laws in Acts, where James, thebrother of Jesus, sought to stem the erosion which Paul's doctrine had alreadyprecipitated, saying: Trouble not them which from the Gentiles are turned to God: But that we writeunto them that they
abstain from meats offered to idols,
and fromfornication, and
from things strangled, and from blood
.
The seriousness of the dietary prohibition is such that it is compared with'fornication'. This offence doesn't seem all that serious now, since it is commonpractice all over the modern world for young men and women to experiment withsex before marriage, or 'live together' without getting married, or even gothrough a succession of sexual partners for pleasure without any commitmentseach to the other. Among believing Muslims, however, it is a very seriousoffence. So serious that it often carries with it an unofficial death sentence due tothe shame the family feels in which fornication occurs. This unofficial death sentence is cultural, but born of the prohibition of sexwithout marriage. The Islamic Divine Law
does not allow a death sentence inthese cases, and condemns such 'honour killings' as murder. According to DivineLaw, however, the offending parties of a fornication case, both the boy and girl,should be scourged and then exiled from the community of Muslims in which theevent took place for one year lest, in the hereafter, their punishment were to beroasted in a cauldron during the life of the grave
until the Day of Judgement,should they died on it without repentance. The defence that the Christians I spoke to have erected to justify their non-observance of The Torah Laws, especially concerning what they eat, is threepronged, centring around, in the Gospels,
Matthew Chapter 15
and
Mark Chapter 7
. They also cite
Acts 10
from Luke's scripture, and various passagesfrom
Galatians
and
Romans
in which Paul argues the abrogation of Mosaic Law. These evidences I will, God willing, present and examine first. I will then discussdietary law using Islamic proofs. Finally, I will present evidence that Jesus, mayhe be praised, came not to abrogate, but confirm, the Mosaic Law to the Jews,and examine the claim that Jesus was to allow the people to distance themselvesfrom that which had been added to it by the priesthood, and his mission was, asis written in
Quran:
“to attest the Law which was before me, and
to make lawful to you part of what was
(before)
forbidden
to you...”
and thus that Christians are obliged, according to their scriptures, and nowaccording to ours, to follow the Monotheistic Laws of God that are enshrined inthe Quran, which confirms what is in the Gospel and Torah .
2
Acts 15:19-20
and
28-29,
and
Acts 21:24-25
3
The Divine Law
derived from the Quran and official teachings of Prophet Muhammad(May God Praise him), called
al-Shariy'ah
.
4
The place between Death and Resurrection often referred to as
Barzakh.
This life issimilar in concept to
Purgatory,
though not exactly the same.
5
Quran, 6:50
3
Leave a Comment