Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Jose Alfredo Fonseca-Velasquez, A200 586 281 (BIA Mar. 10, 2014)

Jose Alfredo Fonseca-Velasquez, A200 586 281 (BIA Mar. 10, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 270|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record for further consideration of the respondent’s motion to suppress because the immigration judge made no factual findings regarding the circumstances surrounding a traffic stop conducted by local police or whether the respondent was interviewed by a federal immigration officer. The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the record for further consideration of the respondent’s motion to suppress because the immigration judge made no factual findings regarding the circumstances surrounding a traffic stop conducted by local police or whether the respondent was interviewed by a federal immigration officer. The decision was written by Member Linda Wendtland.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Mar 18, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/12/2014

pdf

text

original

 
Dan Vodra  Cole
&
Vora, LP 209 E. Washigton Street Suite 305 Iowa City A 52240
U
Department
of
Justice
Executive Oce r Immigraon Revew
Board of Immigation Appeals Oce of the Clerk
5107 Leesburg Pike, Sute 200 Fa/ Curch. Vrgn 0530
OHS/CE ice of Chief Consel -MA 177 Avene H maha NE 680 Nae: FNSECA VELASQUEZ JE A ...  A 200-586-28 Date o ths otice /10/2014
nclosed s a copy of he Boar's decsio ad order n he above-ereced case. ncosre
Panel Members: Wdtd, Lid S.
Sincerey,
D
c
a
Dona Car Che Clerk
chuk seeam Dt
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Jose Alfredo Fonseca-Velasquez, A200 586 281 (BIA Mar. 10, 2014)
 
US
epartment
f
Jusice
xecve Oce r mmo Revew Deco o e Bod o
l
mm
g
a
t
i
o ea Fa Crc Vga
20530
Fi  A200 586 28 -Omaha NE I r: JSE AFRO FOSECAVELASQEZ I REMVA PROCEEDNGS  APPEAL O EALF OF ESPONDE a Vora Esquir ON BEAF F HS HARGE: Ct P. Samsn  Assstat Chi Cusl Dat  Nc S 212(a)(6)(A)() &N Act [8 USC
§
82(a)(6)(A)(i] Prst wtout bg amit r parod  APPLICAION Spprssio
MR 
4
h rspont who was un t b a nati ad citzn o ico appals th Immgrato udgs Ma 23 202 cs dg th rspondnts motion t supprss th Form -23
hs cas.
ee
Exh 2 W rviw th Imato Judgs ual gs r car or a a othr ssus
e
nv o
ee
8 CFR.
§
003 ()(3) Th cas wi  radd Acrdg to h rspodt o Novmbr 26 200 th car h was drivg was stoppd b ocrs o th Ca Rapds Poc Dpmt RPD Th rspodt idicatd that  was giv citas r Ipror Brak Lght no drrs lcs a riig without liabiit corag a h was ta t custod.
ee
Eh 5 at 4-6; spondts ri at
9.
hn trwd durg is dtto h rsndnt admitt tha  is a nati and citizn  xico  hat h trd t td Stats illgal h rspondnts statmts wr cud  th rspdts Fm -23 Rcord o Dporab/Iadmissbl Ain   rspndt subsut  a mto to supprss t -23 O appal th rspod argus that th mmgrato Jg rrd b dnig th mtn to supprss Acrdg to t rspot ar is stp b th CRPD ocr h shoud l ha  rcd ac citts a h shld t av n t t cust  st cams at h w stpp ad tad bcaus  hs ispaic apparc
ee
Rspondnts ri at 
 Imigao Jug ssud a subsqut dcisi  August 3 22 grntg t  rsponts rqust r outar dparur a altatl ordrig rml A rrcs  t mgato Jdgs dcso rat t th Ma 23 02 cis ss rws ncat
Cite as: Jose Alfredo Fonseca-Velasquez, A200 586 281 (BIA Mar. 10, 2014)
 
A
586 281 I
NS v. Lopez-Menoz
468 US. 1032, 050-51 (1984), e Spreme Cour eld tat te Fourt Amenment exlusioay rue is generaly inapplcable o depoaio proeeings, bt le ope e possibiity of aplyig hs re if tere are egegious Forth menmen vioaions whch tasess i mendmet oos of amenta iess ad uermine e probatve vaue of te evidee.
See so opez-Gbre v Hoer
653 .3 683, 686 (8h Cir. 201

(expessg oubt as to whete e exlusion rule sol apply i imigration proeeings o the bass o onuct y state or loa poice oes, eve in te ase o egregious violatos, but ultimatel lg on bass hat eor i not suppor petitione's belie hat rafc stop and est wee acaly motivated)
Puc-Ruz v Hoer
629 F.3 77, 778 (8 Ci 2010) Respoes Brief at 56 is Bo as ecogized at, alhog te exlusionary rule is generally iappliable in remova oceeigs, suppession is appopiate whee te evence was obained i a mane so eegous that its use would vioate due proess by oeing the eqiements o dament iess.
ee, eg ter of Toro
17 &N e. 340, 343 (BI 1980);
 see lso  Mter of Brces
9 &N e 609, 6 (BI 988);
 Mer of Grc
17 &N De. 319, 321 (BIA 980)
terofnovl
17 I&N e. 70 (BIA 979); Respondet's Brief at 5-16
A
alien seeng the exlusio of evidence based on e For Amendment beas e burden of estabishig a
 prm fce
ase that te evience shod e suppresse
See er of ng
13 I&N e. 691 IA 1971) Only wen an alien as come rward ih adequate evidene in support o sppression will te bde sh to te epament o Homelan Serity S to justi e mae in whih it obaied te evidene
See Mer of ng supr
This od has aso ed at n -23 is ierely trustwory and amissible to prove aienage absent any indiaton at i otains inatio at is oet or was obtaine by oerio o dess
See Mter of GomezGomez
23 I&N e 522, 524 (BIA 2002);
S v onceHernnez
22 &N De 784, 785 (BI 999)
tter of Brcens supr
at 61. In tis ase, the migraion Juge reie e basis o wch e respode chalenge is stop an detetion (I.J. at 3-4) e Imigration Jdge mae o ctal dings with regard to he stop an e etenton, however or example e mmigraion dge dd not mae tual ndings egg te date ad iumstanes suroundig he respodet's stop d detention, wheter e espondent was teriewed by a CRP oce or an oe om mmgatio and Customs Enoreme, e allegations mae in e respoen's aavit, or e espoden's ediblity
ee
Ex 5 at 1 The mmgraon Jge did no set h is easons r reahng the coclso tat he esone had not esablised a
 prm fce
ase that his ostiutional gts were violaed (IJ a 4). Wiout suh t ndings, we ae nable to aequatey reve e Immigaton Jge's colusions
See Mer of S-H-
23 &N ec. 462, 465 (BIA 2002 (gien  the o's limie ct-nding ntion, it is "inreasingly impora r te Imigraion dge  to ae cea a cmpee ngs o ct ta ae sppoe

 e ecod a i copiae wi controllig la For ese easons, we wil emand this ase to e Iigration Jdge o make te neessay tual digs  te s inste. Aorigly, e lowing order il be enteed.
2
Cite as: Jose Alfredo Fonseca-Velasquez, A200 586 281 (BIA Mar. 10, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->