Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Lorenzo Martinez-Delgado, A074 103 780 (BIA Mar. 11, 2014)

Lorenzo Martinez-Delgado, A074 103 780 (BIA Mar. 11, 2014)

Ratings: (0)|Views: 375|Likes:
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) terminated proceedings upon finding third degree sexual assault under Wis. Stat. 939.2 not to be an aggravated felony involving sexual abuse of a minor under the modified categorical approach. The Board concluded that although the statute is divisible, the respondent pleaded no contest, nothing in the record of conviction indicated the factual basis for the offense, and the victim's age was not an element of the crime of which the respondent was convicted. The Board also dismissed the charge of removability under INA 237(a)(2)(A)(i) (commission of crime involving moral turpitude within five years of admission) because the offense was committed before the respondent’s adjustment of status. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley and joined by Member Garry Malphrus and Member John Guendelsberger.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index
In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) terminated proceedings upon finding third degree sexual assault under Wis. Stat. 939.2 not to be an aggravated felony involving sexual abuse of a minor under the modified categorical approach. The Board concluded that although the statute is divisible, the respondent pleaded no contest, nothing in the record of conviction indicated the factual basis for the offense, and the victim's age was not an element of the crime of which the respondent was convicted. The Board also dismissed the charge of removability under INA 237(a)(2)(A)(i) (commission of crime involving moral turpitude within five years of admission) because the offense was committed before the respondent’s adjustment of status. The decision was written by Member Roger Pauley and joined by Member Garry Malphrus and Member John Guendelsberger.

Looking for IRAC’s Index of Unpublished BIA Decisions? Visit www.irac.net/unpublished/index

More info:

Published by: Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC on Mar 20, 2014
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/07/2014

pdf

text

original

 
(
 Te Broeck, Jr., James C., Esquire Cicago migraio Advocaes 20 So Cark S, Se. 2120 Cicago,  60603
US pm  J
Executive Oce r Imgraion Revew
B  Ig Al O  h Clk
5107
Leburg Pik, S1te
2000
Fals Chc Vgna
0530
HS/ICE Oice of Chief Cousel
CH 525 Wes Va Buren Sree Chicago, L 60607 Name: MARTINZ DELGADO, LORENZO  A 074-103780 Dae o this otice: 3/11/2014
closd s  copy of he Board's dcision and oder in te above-rencd case. cose
 b
Malphrus, Ga
D
Guendesberge Jon Pauley, Roge
Sinceey,
D
c
t
Don C Cif k
ud 
Docket
-�
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Lorenzo Martinez-Delgado, A074 103 780 (BIA Mar. 11, 2014)
 
S
D�pament

Justice
E O  
 igon
Rw
Deiio
 B
 of mo p l Cuh Va

ile  A 074 103 780 Chicao,
 In re LOZO MRDEGDO
MOVL PROCGS  PPE  Date: ON BF OF SPOD James C Ten Bk, Jr , Esquie ON BEHLF OF DHS  Daniel
 A ssist Chie Counsel HGE
MA 1 204
 Notie Sec. 237   2)(A)(ii), I &  Act [8 U.SC
1227(  2XA iii] -on of  aated felony
dened in stion ( ( 43(A,  I& N  A t 8 U.S.C.
 0 a)(43)(ASec 237  (2)A(i), I& N  A c 8 S.C
22(a  2(A(i -Conid of ime inolvng moral pide PLIC A TION Tenation The respondent appes he Immiation Judge's gst 9, 2013, ision rdeng him remo om he United Stes. We ill sustan the appea is ppeal presens quesios of law, wch e Bo revis uner a e noo dd of reiew 8 C.FR
103 (  3(ii. This matte as last bere e Bod on My 2, 213,  hen e sustained the Depment of Homelad Secuis aea of a enaion ordr, d hel  he respondt is mle for hing bn con of  aated elony We remand the rord to o e reondt to pe y claims r reef om remoal On  emd, he respondet did not le y application  relie Sbseuent o ou rand, te Supme Cour issued

v.
Ud S,
33 St 2276 (2013, rectg us of the modd egoc approa to satutes it elictly disible minal elemens. The Wscosn se uer wch the resnde
w
conict is diisible in he sit sense requ by
.
 we describd in ou pr disio Wis. S.
§
940.2253 99 re  u es c o cose by te tim, d te sto enition o ac o consent is diisible. Wis St
93922(  4 (1998) pvides, "Wiho con mes no nsent in t or tha nsnt is ien r one of the lloing reasons . . icluding being unege us, our use o the modi categoca approach to detne e eements o the respondent's me is appropiate. The ecord of convctio, cluin e mended Ioao, indies te responde  cag  he oense inlig lack o cnnt b on e iim being under 16 yes of
Cite as: Lorenzo Martinez-Delgado, A074 103 780 (BIA Mar. 11, 2014)
 
r
 07
4 I
3 780 e. Hoev, the resnent  not plea gulty as che; rath, he plea no ntest d  was unuly by he cour  2).  Nothng n the recor idcates hat s he cou und o provde
a
 bass r he oense The recor does not nan any documen tha ncates hch type o lack o consent w und to be  elemen o e responents oense Specca y, nothng n he recor establshes that he vctms e s an element o e me o  whch the respone was convcte. Thus, un e mo cateocal approach, he recor o convon s nsucent to ablsh that the oense o hich the responent as convcte nvolve a nor  A ccorngly, the DHS has not m ts buren o proving he responent has  bn convic o seal abse o a mnor The respondent comme hs crme beween December

  eba
4
(Exh 
.
2) Hs ony amsson to the Uted Saes was s ajustmen o saus n
8.
Secon 237(a)(2)(A)()(o e ct reners removable one ho
 been nv o a cme volvng moral turptue mm th 5 yes
r
amsson Becse he respone's cmnal conuc pred hs ajument o stas the convcton oes not rener hm removable uner secon 237(a)(2)(A)() o the  A c
S M r of S
23 I&  De 75
(
205) A ccorngy, we ll sustan the respondents appe an ll ermnate hese removal proceedns. OE: The appeal s sustned an hese removal pcens e tnaed
FOR T BO
Cite as: Lorenzo Martinez-Delgado, A074 103 780 (BIA Mar. 11, 2014)

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->